gtx 760 is more than 10% faster than stock 7950
Dude, u sure the results are at stock? If u look carefully, 760 is being compared against 7950 Boost. And 7950 Boost is a re-released 7950 card with boost stock settings. Wad u shld show is 7950 without boost, which is the original 7950 version released in Jan 2012.
...cheaper by only $10...Extracted:
At 1080p it is clearly ahead of both the stock and boost versions of the 7950, by 13% and 8% respectively. This is by no means a commanding lead and AMD still offers better performance in some cases, but on average the GTX 760 is faster, quieter, and $30-$50 cheaper than AMD’s closest competitor.
Amd cheaper here though..
The other way round bro. AMD lacks the PhsyX and CUDA technologies possessed by Nvidia cards to enable GPU acceleration during video rendering, esp in Autodesk programs.In my own humble 2 cents opinion, AMD Radeon for graphics/video editing.. Nvidia for gaming..![]()
You have been stating that the 7950 performs worse then the gtx 760 at the same price but no source have been shared.. At least i show some states anyway comparison with stock AMD reference card.
AMD Radeon HD 7950 w/ Boost Versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 - Battlefield 3 - Legit Reviews
And looking MORE CLOSELY this time. The gtx are OC and just having less then 10 FPS
difference?
If looking at prices on amazon , the GTX is of course more worth it... Unless 1 can acquire the
windforce 760 for $409 locally. The 7950 powercolour is more bang for buck?
the windforce is indeed $409 locally.
Confirmed + Chopped.![]()
And the Asus is $429 I think I will have my first Asus product soon. See what's the hype about them haha
