Advise needed for upgrade

blue00

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
9,174
Reaction score
2,422
Hi guys


My brother current pc is using Q9400, ddr3 ram


however the motherboard spoil


So it it advisable to upgrade to the newer G3258 or just change motherboard will do?
 

Alternative X

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
2,322
Reaction score
0
You will need to change the CPU as well as LGA 775 CPUs will not fit into a LGA 1150 motherboard. Do also note that the G3258 is a dual core CPU and performance may suffer if running multithreaded tasks.
 

BabyTurkey

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
625
Reaction score
10
U can get a replacement LGA775 motherboard from Tradepac (~$65). No problem with rams since the new mobo will use DDR3 rams too.
 

blue00

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
9,174
Reaction score
2,422
You will need to change the CPU as well as LGA 775 CPUs will not fit into a LGA 1150 motherboard. Do also note that the G3258 is a dual core CPU and performance may suffer if running multithreaded tasks.



will the new dual core faster than the quad core?
 

wkweewee

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Messages
26,900
Reaction score
14
will the new dual core faster than the quad core?

Hmm more cores do not equate to faster speed.

Eg 1. Blablabla Dual Core Processor @3.5Ghz
1st Core: 3.50Ghz
2nd Core: 3.50Ghz

Eg 2. Yayaya Quad Core Processor @3.50Ghz
1st Core: 3.50Ghz
2nd Core: 3.50Ghz
3rd Core: 3.40Ghz
4th Core: 3.30Ghz

Apparently when you open up and use most of applications and some of the games in the market as of now, it will not utilise all the 4 cores. As such, there is NO difference btw 1 and 2 since their base clock is the same. However, if you are doing video rendering which requires multithreading (needing more cores to work), eg 1 would stutter as it has a limited number of cores required. Lesser cores can be good (pricing and high base clock) or bad (if you run multithreaded applications). A quad core with a lower base clock is still SLOWER than a dual core with a higher base clock in applications that do not require multithreading.
 
Last edited:

blue00

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
9,174
Reaction score
2,422
Hmm more cores do not equate to faster speed.

Eg 1. Blablabla Dual Core Processor @3.5Ghz
1st Core: 3.50Ghz
2nd Core: 3.50Ghz

Eg 2. Yayaya Quad Core Processor @3.50Ghz
1st Core: 3.50Ghz
2nd Core: 3.50Ghz
3rd Core: 3.40Ghz
4th Core: 3.30Ghz

Apparently when you open up and use most of applications and some of the games in the market as of now, it will not utilise all the 4 cores. As such, there is NO difference btw 1 and 2 since their base clock is the same. However, if you are doing video rendering which requires multithreading (needing more cores to work), eg 1 would stutter as it has a limited number of cores required. Lesser cores can be good (pricing and high base clock) or bad (if you run multithreaded applications). A quad core with a lower base clock is still SLOWER than a dual core with a higher base clock in applications that do not require multithreading.

in short q8300 vs g3258, which is better?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top