amd r9 benchmarks/reviews...

ondooy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
11,019
Reaction score
1,219
300 Series Products/Reviews


Fury Reviews

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X faster than GTX 980 Ti in 4K
AMD RADEON™ R9 FURY X 4GB HBM 4096-bit Review
AMD Fury X Performance Benchmarks
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4 GB
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB Review - Fiji Finally Tested
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB Review
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X graphics card reviewed
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Video Card Review
Review: AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB
A FURY-OUS REBUTTAL
Radeon R9 Fury X Review: This Is AMD At Their Best
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X review - Introduction
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X graphics card review: AMD's thoughtful 4K powerhouse
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X tested: not quite a 980 Ti killer


Club3D Announces its Radeon R9 Fury X Graphics Card
PowerColor Announces its Radeon R9 Fury X Graphics Card
VisionTek Announces Radeon R9 Fury X, Alongside R9 300 and R7 300 Series







 
Last edited:

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,513
Reaction score
1,385
I knew it. The 390x definitely trade blows with the GTX980 after the rebadge. As i know that definitely the slight change in bined and clocked speed, it should be even nearer to the 980.

Slightly slower in some benchmarks but not too far off at most 1-2% difference.

But the pricing is still far cheaper than 980. Guess it is a good conclusion.
 

ondooy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
11,019
Reaction score
1,219
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X faster than GTX 980 Ti in 4K
AMD-Radeon-R9-Fury-X-vs-GTX-980-Ti-4K-886x900.png

AMD-Radeon-R9-FURY-X-vs-980-TI-900x822.jpg

AMD-Radeon-R9-Fury-X-official-specifications-785x900.png

amd-radeon-fury-overclock-100592120-orig-900x322.png

amd-radeon-fury-x-frame-rate-limit-100592122-orig-900x201.png
 

Mikiberry

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
5,107
Reaction score
0
I knew it. The 390x definitely trade blows with the GTX980 after the rebadge. As i know that definitely the slight change in bined and clocked speed, it should be even nearer to the 980.

Slightly slower in some benchmarks but not too far off at most 1-2% difference.

But the pricing is still far cheaper than 980. Guess it is a good conclusion.

Dont forget the 8gb flamebuffer. Hands down winner for the high end mainstream card.
 

trento

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
62,121
Reaction score
1,991
in the midrange segment, 380 seems to fare better than 960. similar pricing too. believe its on sale here already.
 

avsquare

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
11,314
Reaction score
42
Dont forget the 8gb flamebuffer. Hands down winner for the high end mainstream card.

Yup. I was expecting that from the initial impressions already that's why I was curious about 390X CFX performance, because it has whooping 8GB VRAM asset there.

Now we need to see the local pricing of 390X vs GTX970. If pricing is right 390X will be displacing the worth of the 970 and 980 (after price reduction).
 

Mikiberry

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
5,107
Reaction score
0
Very curious to know Fury X performance in 4k beyond 4gb HBM usage.
Settings seems to be very controlled on a game by game basis ensure all VRAM usage is within limits.
 

Fatfool

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
32,311
Reaction score
107

Hmmmmm power draw isn't insane. I'm surprised. But yeah. the 980Ti just got owned. Better drop price liao. Those who got the 980 Ti on launch must be fuming now. Beats it even on the Nvida optimised games like Batman.

344W can be handled by my Asrock M8's PSU. (but no space for the rad)
 

muddle

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
0
I knew it. The 390x definitely trade blows with the GTX980 after the rebadge. As i know that definitely the slight change in bined and clocked speed, it should be even nearer to the 980.

Slightly slower in some benchmarks but not too far off at most 1-2% difference.

But the pricing is still far cheaper than 980. Guess it is a good conclusion.

How does that translate to local prices?
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,513
Reaction score
1,385
Very curious to know Fury X performance in 4k beyond 4gb HBM usage.
Settings seems to be very controlled on a game by game basis ensure all VRAM usage is within limits.

Its normal.

If you see most benchmarks for 4k, it has to tone down a few settings. Not because of vram, but a playable frame rate between 40-60fps target.


Its easy to see if it chokes. If it chokes, most game you see there with or without AA it will have mostly the same frame rate across all the games such as 30fps.
 

Ark Law

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
535
Local pricing? Not sure. But its not too far off from 290x. It should be around the $4xx-low $5xx range.

290X Lightning went for $459, so should be similar for 390X except that launch price for first few months will be chop carrot
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,513
Reaction score
1,385
290X Lightning went for $459, so should be similar for 390X except that launch price for first few months will be chop carrot

Usually people whom buy at launch is either....


1. Hardware enthusiast, wanna be first to get, dont care pricing.

2. The cannot wait liao need gpu immediately

3. The fanbois

4. The uninformed whom happen to walk in sls during that day of launch.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top