Are macs safe from spyware?

Ev0d3vil

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
36,262
Reaction score
6,814
As above . Am in China atm and keyed in my Apple ID password to download an app on hotel wifi.
 

Alpha1995

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
As above . Am in China atm and keyed in my Apple ID password to download an app on hotel wifi.

Based on my 5 years with Macs, I had never had any spyware/malware problems with them. They aren't 100% safe from spyware, but certainly much more resistant compared to Windows PC.
 

Ev0d3vil

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
36,262
Reaction score
6,814
Based on my 5 years with Macs, I had never had any spyware/malware problems with them. They aren't 100% safe from spyware, but certainly much more resistant compared to Windows PC.

Ah thanks! Cause I'm using Mac for the first time and not really quite sure.
 

GGGGGG

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
5,158
Reaction score
18
I do have this installed on my Mac and run occasional scans periodically, although I do not know if it's useful:
https://www.malwarebytes.org

Previously I had norton installed, but keep experiencing kernel panic attacks.
 

maxheadroom

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,633
Reaction score
35
I am always on the fly to asia country. There is a article that I read while flying about the security over wifi. Summary it said it not about the device that we use, no matter a smart phone, windows, mac, samsung, it come down on the same gateway which is how secure of these free wifi been setup & the application itself. So it might not be the mac you using capture the password, but might be the gateway"free wifi" that steal it.

The reason why all Singapore bank introduce Token or 1 time pass code generate, is because when we key in the password to our device, it been transmit as "Plain". No encoding. It is only when you successful login thru webbase application doing transaction, then it encoded.
 

Janson Ang

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
nothing is safe but then again i have used my macbook for 5 years everywhere and no issues so far
 

davidktw

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
13,550
Reaction score
1,302
I am always on the fly to asia country. There is a article that I read while flying about the security over wifi. Summary it said it not about the device that we use, no matter a smart phone, windows, mac, samsung, it come down on the same gateway which is how secure of these free wifi been setup & the application itself. So it might not be the mac you using capture the password, but might be the gateway"free wifi" that steal it.

The reason why all Singapore bank introduce Token or 1 time pass code generate, is because when we key in the password to our device, it been transmit as "Plain". No encoding. It is only when you successful login thru webbase application doing transaction, then it encoded.

Wifi security apart is a different security issue altogether.

What you describe about 2FA is not why it is required because of how the 1FA Is treated.

With or without 2FA using tokens or any other means, password are not suppose and in properly implemented system will not be transmitted as-is to the server. In fact for proper system all passwords are to be hashed using a one way digest function with some additional requirement and then will be transfer to the server using a secure channel such as HTTPS via SSL.

This allow would be safe but not safe enough because on client systems a lot of times there are things like malwares and key loggers which can capture keystrokes despite security done properly.

As such 2FA helps to provide another layer of security having a device separated from your primary authentication mechanism.

RSA token are appropriate because the token is hardware security mechanism to prevent hacking. It does not require any form of transmission with any party in order to maintain sync with the server so it is considered a disjoint device. All it requires is a unique key and/or synced time with the server and both parties can provide checking in a synchronised manner for authentication. This method is cumbersome in logistic. That is why earlier days we use SMS which is a separate channel but still requires the telco channel which is not as safe compared to RSA token.

These days we also have software solution such as Google Auth which is based on OATH or there are 3rd tokens such as yubikey and more.

The idea is to have a out of band authentication channel from the primary one which has to be as secure as possible too
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top