Are u the type who attacks first, or only counterattack when attacked?

[orpisia]

Attack first if I think they are going to attack me

宁教我负天下人，休教天下人负我！

Isn't this the doctrine of...

 

[Jeremy1]

Peace Not War

 

[orpisia]

I'm the type that kena attached first, will continue to get attack


Read HWZ Forum Rules!

Ya same

Because our reaction slow

Cannot think on our feet

 

[orpisia]

What he is saying ish

以彼之道还施彼身

Thanks

I shall learn this strategy and apply it

 

[idolcritic]

China is always attack others when talking
In actuality is everybody hamtum china

 

[The Legionnaire]

Situational..it's all depends! Usually I run if it's nothing involving my loved ones else ready to be jailed long long time!

 

[dambio]

I'm a man of peace but fafo

 

[Whimsica]

I am the Zoe Tay type - I swallow

 

[KosmoKramer]

Run to somewhere with cctv and don’t be the first one to attack, and try to self defend instead of counter attack.

 

[orpisia]

I'm a man of peace but fafo

Wow first time see that term

 

[YKT^95]

Normally, I will strive to do what is right and good. Therefore, I avoid attacking first because someone who attacks without provocation is always in the wrong. If I suspect others intend to attack me, I will take necessary defensive measures, but I will not initiate the attack. Technically, if the other party hasn't attacked, they haven't done anything wrong...yet.

But but, if in the case they choose to attack me, then too bad laa..they will face the consequences lo. I will do everything necessary to restore myself to my original state. Original state not just refer to my safety and interests, but also my mood. Meaning if my original mood is 'X' and your attack causes it to drop to 'Y', then too bad...I will retaliate until my mood fweels song and returns back to 'X'. So, best is don't go ard disiao or provoke others la. If everyone adopt the mindset of 人不犯我 我不犯人, then conflict likely won't happen one mah

 

[orpisia]

Normally, I will strive to do what is right and good. Therefore, I avoid attacking first because someone who attacks without provocation is always in the wrong. If I suspect others intend to attack me, I will take necessary defensive measures, but I will not initiate the attack. Technically, if the other party hasn't attacked, they haven't done anything wrong...yet.

But but, if in the case they choose to attack me, then too bad laa..they will face the consequences lo. I will do everything necessary to restore myself to my original state. Original state not just refer to my safety and interests, but also my mood. Meaning if my original mood is 'X' and your attack causes it to drop to 'Y', then too bad...I will retaliate until my mood fweels song and returns back to 'X'. So, best is don't go ard disiao or provoke others la. If everyone adopt the mindset of 人不犯我 我不犯人, then conflict likely won't happen one mah

But what if other people attack, to them is not attack

But to u is attack

How like that

 

[Encouragesome1]

U is which type?

I weigh what sort of attack first. Peace for long haul over all sort of violence. If can stop anything with just prevention this is best .
If I have zero means to prevent , then living with giving up one thing eg carve a plot of land or cut a slice of flesh I will live with it

 

[TheITGuy]

I kneel down and beg for mercy how

 

[YKT^95]

But what if other people attack, to them is not attack

But to u is attack

How like that

It depends on intention. If to them is not attack then likely means they dont have the intention to attack. In this case, likely could be due to misunderstanding. Just sit down and have proper communication to resolve things lo. 和平解决问题 lo

Anyways usually before I attack back, I will give sufficient opportunity to have proper communication and give multiple warnings de, bcos I know when I attack I dont hold back. So if they are hostile and insists on attacking and don't want to communicate to de-escalate, then this one obviously is hostile riao