Banking - Physical vs Digital Token

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774
Hi All,
Are there pros/cons using physical vs digital ?
If going overseas, any issues ?

TIA. :D
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,218
Reaction score
5,838
One is on your phone one is an additional piece of equipment?

No if you are talking about using.
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774
One is on your phone one is an additional piece of equipment?

No if you are talking about using.

Yes, one is the phone and the other is standalone piece.
That's good to know.

Maybe I am paranoid which is why I prefer separate devices rather than all-in-one !

Like my SMS and bank apps are on different phones. The SMS phone is like the standalone piece. :s13:
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,218
Reaction score
5,838
Yes, one is the phone and the other is standalone piece.
That's good to know.

Maybe I am paranoid which is why I prefer separate devices rather than all-in-one !

Like my SMS and bank apps are on different phones. The SMS phone is like the standalone piece. :s13:
if that floats your boat lor
 

silverbomb

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
3,945
Reaction score
693
It's good to have phone token than physical token if you're going to be stationed overseas. It's a pain to get the token to be delivered to an overseas address if it is loss or batt died. Anyway most banks has moved onto phone token, latest being HSBC.

Posted from PCWX using SM-G965F
 

Shiny Things

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
854
Hi All,
Are there pros/cons using physical vs digital ?
If going overseas, any issues ?

TIA. :D

I would do unspeakable things for a bank that lets me use a Yubikey.

Anyway. Here's your options:
  • Top of the list is Yubikeys. Super-secure, easy to use, and they fit on your keyring, but not widely supported, sadly.
  • Phone-based authentication is a good tradeoff of convenience and security. The standard here is Google Authenticator on your phone—or a similar phone-based push token, like DBS's system or IBKR's IB Key.
  • Physical tokens, like the old DBS one that looks like a little calculator, are quite secure, but also they're annoyingly complicated, and they're yet another thing to lose. I think these are not a great idea.
  • SMS one-time codes are the bottom of the barrel: better than nothing, but they're extremely easy for a motivated attacker to hijack.
 

bright_84

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
7,928
Reaction score
23
When tokens don't work your life stops. When apps don't work you can always call in.
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774
Thank you all for the inputs.

It is true that using the physical token (POSBank) at times, is really a PITA !

I guess I have to balance the convenience of using the digital token with trusting the security of the mobile device. :D
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,218
Reaction score
5,838
Thank you all for the inputs.

It is true that using the physical token (POSBank) at times, is really a PITA !

I guess I have to balance the convenience of using the digital token with trusting the security of the mobile device. :D

If it’s not secure, bank wouldn’t dare to use it also.

They will be responsible for any breaches anyway
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774
If it’s not secure, bank wouldn’t dare to use it also.

They will be responsible for any breaches anyway


The human is the weakest link.
With the digital token and mobile device, under duress, one could add new transfer account, raise transfer limit and perform a transfer !

Probably I think too much ! :s13:
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,218
Reaction score
5,838
The human is the weakest link.
With the digital token and mobile device, under duress, one could add new transfer account, raise transfer limit and perform a transfer !

Probably I think too much ! :s13:

I think so... probably not enough also.
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774

fr33d0m

Master Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
3,709
Reaction score
729
The perpetrators must have found some loopholes in OCBC online banking. Transactions are quite limited through internet banking without extra 2FAs to transfer money out of customer accounts. Or the victims entered multiple 2FAs during the process…
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774
IMHO.
We still have 1 or 2 gen of people who are digital immigrants.
These age group likely will have a fair bit of money saved.
Seems similar concept as to why we have TraceTogether have tokens parallel with the app.
 

cscs3

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2000
Messages
21,733
Reaction score
133
IMHO.
We still have 1 or 2 gen of people who are digital immigrants.
These age group likely will have a fair bit of money saved.
Seems similar concept as to why we have TraceTogether have tokens parallel with the app.
One thing to take note between the 2 is...
TT case, using token to check in is always faster and it does not depend on yoir mobile signal coverage.
Banks digital token case, need to take note login and token is on the same device. You need to make sure your device (phone) is very secure. Lossing it means you can get impact heavy. Never never assumed no one can break into your phone even you has password to lock it.
 

chiokcc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
13,348
Reaction score
1,527
I always opined that there should be choices of physical or digital token..... who pays for it will be another matter .....
 

chiokcc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
13,348
Reaction score
1,527
I always opined that there should be choices of physical or digital token..... who pays for it will be another matter .....
For example, instead of dis-incentive to stay with physical token, should also try incentive for using digital token .... should not penalise old folks who stay with physical tokens ....
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,383
Reaction score
6,774
One thing to take note between the 2 is...
TT case, using token to check in is always faster and it does not depend on yoir mobile signal coverage.
Banks digital token case, need to take note login and token is on the same device. You need to make sure your device (phone) is very secure. Lossing it means you can get impact heavy. Never never assumed no one can break into your phone even you has password to lock it.
IMHO.
Also, will a person be forcefully coerced into logging into the bank app to perform a big transaction.
Banking apps would have evolved by now so not sure if it was like last time e.g. without the physical token, quite a few transaction cannot be done.
 

fr33d0m

Master Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
3,709
Reaction score
729
One thing to take note between the 2 is...
TT case, using token to check in is always faster and it does not depend on yoir mobile signal coverage.
Banks digital token case, need to take note login and token is on the same device. You need to make sure your device (phone) is very secure. Lossing it means you can get impact heavy. Never never assumed no one can break into your phone even you has password to lock it.
To most people, it is more likely they lose their tokens than their phones.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top