best isp for taobao

[jas663]

Myrepublic totally unable to browse China website.
Have shortlisted Transock and Malus, anyone tried before, which one is better?
Need to use for douying, taobao, 1688, youku, etc...

 

[xiaofan]

Myrepublic totally unable to browse China website.
Have shortlisted Transock and Malus, anyone tried before, which one is better?
Need to use for douying, taobao, 1688, youku, etc...

I only used AJS paid version and Transocks free version myself. AJS was very good but it is a bit difficult to register and pay for the fees.

Between Transocks and Malus, I believe both will work. Transocks is the more established player in this market so it may be a safer bet.

 

[lobukong]

Must be a very weird feeling if someone signed up 10G with MR and finds it's very difficult to load china websites.

 

[Kunkka]

Must be a very weird feeling if someone signed up 10G with MR and finds it's very difficult to load china websites.

Is it so bad meh

 

[lobukong]

Is it so bad meh

I have both M1 and MR.
Yesterday I watch bilibili video using MR and refresh the front page. For 5-10 sec, it showed blank page which is something I've never seen before, as I usually use M1, then after that, I decided to use back M1 for normal browsing for fewer surprises.

I did a ping test just now to compare M1 and MR, really can see some difference.

M1:
PS C:\Users\x>ping bilibili.com

Pinging bilibili.com [8.134.50.24] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=81
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=81
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=81
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=81

Ping statistics for 8.134.50.24:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 205ms, Maximum = 205ms, Average = 205ms

PS C:\Users\x> ping bilibili.com

Pinging bilibili.com [8.134.50.24] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=81
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=81
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=81
Reply from 8.134.50.24: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=81

Ping statistics for 8.134.50.24:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 205ms, Maximum = 206ms, Average = 205ms



MR:
PS C:\Users\x> ping bilibili.com

Pinging bilibili.com [47.103.24.173] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 47.103.24.173: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=83
Request timed out.
Reply from 47.103.24.173: bytes=32 time=322ms TTL=83
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 47.103.24.173:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 322ms, Maximum = 325ms, Average = 323ms

PS C:\Users\x> ping bilibili.com

Pinging bilibili.com [47.103.24.173] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Reply from 47.103.24.173: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=83
Request timed out.
Reply from 47.103.24.173: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=83

Ping statistics for 47.103.24.173:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 326ms, Maximum = 326ms, Average = 326ms

 

[xiaofan]

Old thread but may be still of some reference value.

M1 10Gbps plan, TP-Link Archer BE805 as main router, IPv4 only.

Intel N100 Mini PC with dual Intel 82599ES based 10Gbe SPF+ adapter,
LxC container on top of PVE.

Looks pretty bad...

Only exception is s.taobao.com which seems to have CDN now (used to be bad for M1).

root@debian13ct12r1:~/ookla# ping -c 4 taobao.com
PING taobao.com (59.82.122.140) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 59.82.122.140: icmp_seq=1 ttl=83 time=238 ms
64 bytes from 59.82.122.140: icmp_seq=2 ttl=83 time=238 ms
64 bytes from 59.82.122.140: icmp_seq=3 ttl=83 time=238 ms
64 bytes from 59.82.122.140: icmp_seq=4 ttl=83 time=238 ms

--- taobao.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 237.681/237.835/237.973/0.114 ms

root@debian13ct12r1:~/ookla# ping -c 4 s.taobao.com
PING s.taobao.com.queniuak.com (163.181.201.182) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 163.181.201.182: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=2.28 ms
64 bytes from 163.181.201.182: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=2.44 ms
64 bytes from 163.181.201.182: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=2.45 ms
64 bytes from 163.181.201.182: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=2.32 ms

--- s.taobao.com.queniuak.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.281/2.373/2.453/0.074 ms

root@debian13ct12r1:~/ookla# ping -c 4 1688.com
PING 1688.com (140.205.174.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 140.205.174.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=83 time=228 ms
64 bytes from 140.205.174.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=83 time=228 ms
64 bytes from 140.205.174.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=83 time=227 ms
64 bytes from 140.205.174.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=83 time=227 ms

--- 1688.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 226.942/227.324/227.633/0.268 ms

root@debian13ct12r1:~/ookla# ping -c 4 qq.com
PING qq.com (123.150.76.218) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 123.150.76.218: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=214 ms
64 bytes from 123.150.76.218: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=215 ms

--- qq.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 2 received, 50% packet loss, time 3029ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 214.190/214.377/214.564/0.187 ms

root@debian13ct12r1:~/ookla# ping -c 4 douyin.com
PING douyin.com (101.126.56.164) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 101.126.56.164: icmp_seq=2 ttl=43 time=251 ms
64 bytes from 101.126.56.164: icmp_seq=4 ttl=43 time=251 ms

--- douyin.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 2 received, 50% packet loss, time 10837ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 251.458/251.470/251.482/0.012 ms

root@debian13ct12r1:~/ookla# ping -c 4 bilibili.com
PING bilibili.com (8.134.50.24) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.134.50.24: icmp_seq=1 ttl=83 time=242 ms
64 bytes from 8.134.50.24: icmp_seq=2 ttl=83 time=243 ms
64 bytes from 8.134.50.24: icmp_seq=3 ttl=83 time=242 ms
64 bytes from 8.134.50.24: icmp_seq=4 ttl=83 time=242 ms

--- bilibili.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 242.032/242.291/242.662/0.229 ms

 

[t2vdeaevd]

normal broadband will have really bad china internet access. it will usually be routed to many global routing points before reaching china

 

[xiaofan]

normal broadband will have really bad china internet access. it will usually be routed to many global routing points before reaching china

Based on the test results in the below thread, MR Gamer Plan is the best. SingTel is not too bad. M1 and SIMBA are not good.
https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/threads/fastest-isp.6996674/