Biolidics Limited (8YY.SI)

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
375,051
Reaction score
121,697
Biolidics says will take up to 9 months to incorporate A*Star tech into new serology tests

Biolidics says will take up to 9 months to incorporate A*Star tech into new serology tests

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/co...o-9-months-to-incorporate-astar-tech-into-new

COVID-19 test kit maker Biolidics said late on Thursday that it anticipates it will take up to nine months to incorporate technology it recently licensed from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*Star) into a new serology test kit.

It was responding to queries from the Singapore Exchange (SGX) on Wednesday around the timing and details of the Catalist-listed company's announcement on Tuesday night.

In the announcement, Biolidics said it had on July 9 entered into a five-year licence agreement with A*Star's commercialisation arm for non-exclusive worldwide rights to the agency's technology for the detection of Covid-19 viral spike/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 blocking antibodies for diagnostic use, to further develop the technology and to market new serology tests that incorporate the technology.

Biolidics on Thursday said it is currently in the initial phase of the product's development, and had shortlisted a number of potential partners for product development, optimisation, validation and eventual commercialisation of the technology and/or licensed products.

It is still in the process of assessing these partners, it said.

"As described in the (Tuesday) announcement, the company would like to highlight again that there is no certainty that the company will be able to, among others, successfully develop the serology tests which incorporate the technology," it added.

On queries whether it provided any consideration for being granted the rights to use A*Star's technology, Biolidics said it was obliged to pay for the use of the technology, but that the terms of its payment were confidential, and it was not in its interest to publicly disclose them.

It added that it had the right to use the technology and develop its own enhancements during the five-year agreement term. After the term, it will only own the enhancements it has created on its own, and will no longer have the right to use the technology.

SGX had also asked whether there were conditions to be met before Biolidics could market serology tests incorporating A*Star's technology, and when the company expected to be able to market these tests.

The bourse operator questioned Biolidics on how far along it was in successfully incorporating the technology into its Covid-19 antibody test kit, or any other form of serology tests.

Biolidics on Thursday clarified that it intends to incorporate the technology only into new serology tests, and not its existing Covid-19 Antibody Test Kit.

It said it is unable to provide any indication on when it would be able to market these serology tests, if developed.

Biolidics is required to perform validation of the tests before seeking regulatory authorisations and/or approvals, it said. The commercialisation of the tests depends on the time required to obtain these approvals, and Biolidics' ability to obtain suitable product liability insurance.

Biolidics said it was not, at the current point in time, able to provide any indication of the time required for validation to be completed and to obtain the relevant regulatory approvals.

It added there was no certainty it could successfully develop the tests, achieve regulatory approvals, and commercialise the tests.

The company will make the necessary announcements to update shareholders and potential investors as and when there are material developments.

SGX on Wednesday also asked Biolidics to provide reasons for its delay in announcing the A*Star pact.

The company explained that the agreement was signed after trading hours on July 9. As July 10 was Polling Day, and July 11 and 12 was a weekend, it was only able to finalise the contents of its announcement on July 14, it said.

Biolidics' sponsor and board approved the announcement on July 14 at around 9.37 pm and 10.45 pm respectively, it added.

"The announcement, which would not have a material impact on the current financial year, was disclosed with the intention of keeping the market updated," Biolidics said.

It added that its sponsor was aware and was consulted on the disclosure of the A*Star agreement, and the sponsor had advised Biolidics to monitor its share price and trading activities prior to the release of the announcement.

The sponsor had provided comments on various drafts of the announcement and was apprised of the comments on the draft announcement received from various parties.

The sponsor also advised Biolidics to call for a trading halt on July 13 after consultation with SGX, Biolidics added.

Biolidics shares jumped 29.3 per cent on Monday to S$0.52 before it called for a trading halt at 12.19pm. It released the A*Star announcement on Tuesday at 10.46pm, before lifting the halt on Wednesday morning ahead of the market's opening bell.

Biolidics shares were trading at S$0.41 as at 9.45am on Friday, up S$0.02 or 5.1 per cent.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
375,051
Reaction score
121,697
Biolidics issues letter of demand to biochip partner Sysmex over alleged IP deal breaches

Biolidics issues letter of demand to biochip partner Sysmex over alleged IP deal breaches

https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...demand-to-biochip-partner-sysmex-over-alleged

SINGAPORE (THE BUSINESS TIMES) - A Catalist-listed medtech firm that made strong gains this year as investors hunt for tech exposure, has now claimed that that a Japanese group breached intellectual property-related (IP) agreements.

Biolidics has issued a letter of demand to Japan-based healthcare group Sysmex Corporation, saying that Sysmex breached IP obligations under a collaboration agreement struck in 2016 for the joint development of biochips.

Biolidics is claiming that Sysmex has filed certain patent applications in the US, China, Japan and Europe which contain IP, technical information and/or know-how that belongs to Biolidics and/or qualifies as newly-developed or jointly-developed IP under the development agreement.

Under the agreement, both parties agreed that any newly-developed or jointly-developed IP would be jointly owned.

They would also need to discuss which countries the patent applications will be made, as well as the percentage of each party's respective ownership share before the applications are filed.

Such patent applications would then be jointly filed by both parties after an agreement is made.

Biolidics asserted that Sysmex had an obligation under the development agreement to reach a joint agreement prior to filing the applications.

"The company also asserts that in filing the patent applications without reaching a joint agreement with the company, Sysmex had breached its obligations of confidence and to act in good faith owed to the company under the development agreement," Biolidics said in a bourse filing on Friday night (Oct 16).

Biolidics has demanded that Sysmex provide an undertaking that it will refrain from using or disclosing Biolidics' confidential information contained in, among others, IP, technical information and/or know-how.

Sysmex, in its undertaking, will also need to rectify the pending patent applications to reflect Biolidics as sole proprietor or joint proprietor, as the case may be; and enter into a commercial licensing agreement with Bioliodics for any and all relevant IP owned by Biolidics which Sysmex requires for its commercial endeavours.

Biolidics demanded that Sysmex affirms under oath, a full and complete listing of any and all patent applications filed in respect of or in connection with the development agreement.

Biolidics also demanded compensation from Sysmex for legal or other reasonable administrative costs incurred in this matter.

The company said it is working with its legal advisers to monitor the progress of this matter and will update its shareholders if there are any material developments. In the meantime, the group's operations are unaffected by this matter.

If Sysmex fails to comply with the letter of demand, Biolidics said it intends to take all necessary steps to protect its interests, including starting dispute resolution proceedings in accordance with the development agreement.

The matter may have an impact on the group's financial performance for the financial year ending Dec 31, 2020, depending on the timing and outcome of Sysmex's response to the letter of demand. The group said it is unable to quantify the impact of the matter on its fiscal 2020 financial performance.

Shares of Biolidics were up half a cent at $0.33 as at 10.14am on Monday. At its height this year, the stock more than doubled since it started the year trading at $0.225. But the shares have lost some ground since July.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
375,051
Reaction score
121,697
Biolidics serves arbitration notice to biochip partner Sysmex over IP woes

Biolidics serves arbitration notice to biochip partner Sysmex over IP woes

https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...tion-notice-to-biochip-partner-sysmex-over-ip

SINGAPORE (THE BUSINESS TIMES) - Catalist-listed medtech firm Biolidics on Thursday said it has issued a notice of arbitration (NOA) to Japan-based healthcare group Sysmex Corporation in light of disputes over intellectual property (IP) matters.

This comes after Biolidics in October served a letter of demand to Sysmex, alleging that the latter had breached IP obligations under a collaboration agreement struck in 2016 for the joint development of biochips.

Biolidics had claimed that Sysmex had filed certain patent applications in the US, China, Japan and Europe which contain IP, technical information and/or know-how that belongs to Biolidics, and/or qualifies as newly developed or jointly developed IP under the development agreement.

According to Biolidics, both parties had agreed that any newly developed or jointly developed IP would be jointly owned. They would also need to discuss in which countries the patent applications will be made, as well as the percentage of each party's respective ownership share before the applications are filed. Such patent applications would then be filed by both parties after an agreement is reached.

In a bourse filing on Thursday (Nov 5), Biolidics noted that its claims against Sysmex include a declaration that the subject matter of the patent applications comprises wholly, or at least in part, Biolidic's background IP, and/or newly developed or jointly developed IP.

The company is also looking for Sysmex to deliver up all of Biolidics' background IP that continues to remain in its possession, and for Sysmex to rectify the patent applications to reflect Biolidics as sole proprietor, or joint proprietor, as the case may be.

Among other things, Biolidics noted that Sysmex should affirm under oath a full listing of patent applications filed in respect, or in connection with the development agreement, or use of the firm's background IP in any commercial endeavours, or research and development programmes.

It is also seeking for Sysmex to bear the costs of the arbitration, along with a sum to be assessed.

Biolidics said it has been advised that, unless Sysmex voluntarily complies with the NOA claims, the arbitration is unlikely to conclude within FY2020. As such, the company will continue to incur legal fees expenditure to maintain the arbitration at this stage.

Separately, Biolidics on Thursday also noted that it has received a counterclaim from Sysmex's legal counsel on Nov 4 in response to Biolidics' letter of demand which was issued last month.

Under the counterclaim, Sysmex alleged that Biolidics had breached its obligations under a feasibility study agreement entered into between both parties in August 2014; specifically, that Biolidics had filed a patent application in May 2016 containing IP that may have belonged to Sysmex.

Sysmex's claims against the company include that this particular patent application and all related applications or patents be converted to one of joint ownership, with all expenses to be borne by Biolidics.

Having consulted with its legal advisers, Biolidics is of the view that the counterclaim is "wholly without merit", and fails to satisfactorily address and/or comply with its letter of demand, it said.

As at 11.53am on Thursday, Biolidics shares were trading at 31 cents, up one cent or 3.3 per cent, amid broad market gains on the Singapore bourse and elsewhere in the region.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
375,051
Reaction score
121,697

Biolidics develops test detecting a person's protective immunity against Covid-19; shares jump​


https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...tecting-a-persons-protective-immunity-against
SINGAPORE (THE BUSINESS TIMES) - Biolidics on Monday (Sept 21) said it has developed a new product which detects an individual's protective immunity against Covid-19.

The medtech company has also obtained confirmation for the CE marking of its ClearEpi NAB Test product. This allows it to market and sell the test in the European Union (EU), as it complies with the relevant EU safety, health and environmental protection requirements.

That being said, the CE marking does not guarantee that the company will be able to secure supply or successfully commercialise the ClearEpi NAB Test.

On this note, Biolidics said it is in the process of negotiating a definitive agreement with its contract manufacturer for the product and getting the relevant product liability insurance. The test is not intended for at-home testing and will be limited to professional use.

Biolidics shares jumped when the stock market opened on Tuesday after the announcement. The counter was trading at 14.1 cents, up 1.3 cents or 10.2 per cent, at 9.11am.

The ClearEpi NAB Test incorporates the technology used to detect Covid-19 viral spike proteins. Viral spike proteins bind to the surface of an individual's cells, including lung cells, in the process allowing Covid-19 to enter the cells and result in an infection.

Biolidics said the ClearEpi NAB Test is intended for the qualitative detection of circulating human IgG neutralising antibodies capable of attaching to the Covid-19 spike proteins and preventing binding.

"The company wishes to highlight that the ClearEpi NAB Test is intended for use as an aid in identifying individuals with an adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and should not be used to diagnose or exclude acute SARS-CoV-2 infection," Biolidics added.

Biolidics expects the development of the test and the receipt of the CE marking to contribute positively to its revenue for the financial year ending Dec 31, 2021, provided the company is able to successfully market and commercialise the test in the EU.

It is unable to quantify such financial impact as the test has not yet been launched, hence sales uptake cannot be determined.
 

Strikk

Master Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Messages
4,567
Reaction score
545
I dont see any value add to biolidics covid 19 related kits. They are all same same but different brands. Nothing special.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top