Budget 2017

charlesboy

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
The increase in price of water may set off another inflationary cycle as businesses pass the increased cost of treated water to consumers, and it affects many levels of the supply chain.

However, hopefully Singapore can be more water self-sustainable.

We need to be prepared for a challenging year ahead.

Maybe the Finance Minister can exercise a more compassionate approach towards the man on the streets.

What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:

xthene

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
534
Reaction score
2
did Malaysia increase water price? Unlikely since our water contract with Malaysia ends 2060. So why the increase in water prize? The govt argues water price has not changed for 17 yrs. Come on, the water contract with Malaysia was signed for a duration of 100 yrs from 1962 to 2060. So the water price malaysia charging us is the same for 100 yrs!!!!! do we need more new water plants now?????? because of growing population????? technology cost would only become cheaper. if there is no urgent now, we can build more new water plants 10-20 yrs later instead of now.
 

Providence

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
18,172
Reaction score
0
The government is taking money from us and give money to the business sector.

Simple as that. The economy is unstable and uncertain so the government is finding ways to get more money this year to prepare for the worst.

But the Ministers' salaries remain the same. :s13: And not one of them takes public transports to work EVERYDAY. Ironic...
 

ahleegee

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Any excuse to take from one area (increase water price) and pump elsewhere... ... what's new. Us peasants can cont. to pay & pay!
 

oration37

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
1,665
Reaction score
1
Taxing on water = taxing on ppl's need. Tax should be implemented on wants, not needs.

PUB said the Waterborne Fee (WBF) fee will increase to 92 cents per cubic metre for households that consume 40 cubic metres of water or less each month, from July 2018. A second tier of the fee will be introduced at a rate of S$1.18 per cubic metre for households which use more than 40 cubic metres. PUB said this is to discourage households from using excessive amounts of water.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...rices-to-rise-by-30-over-2-years/3534474.html

This 2 tiers Waterborne Fee is, in my personal opinion, not properly crafted. Examples:

(1) Let's say family A cook, dine and wash dishes for every dinner VS family B that always dine out. Family A is sure to consume more water.

(2) Let's say there are different number of family members. Family A has 6 household members (i.e. 2 grandparents, husband, wife and 2 kids). Family B has 4 household members (i.e. husband, wife and 2 kids). Possible for family A to consume less water than family B? In this way, family A gets penalized indirectly for staying and providing care for the aged elderly.
 

mikezuper

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2002
Messages
18,470
Reaction score
1,028
They want people to consume 30% less due to linggu reservoir but still want to maintain the revenue
 

falcom2002

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2002
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
0
The government is taking money from us and give money to the business sector.

Simple as that. The economy is unstable and uncertain so the government is finding ways to get more money this year to prepare for the worst.

But the Ministers' salaries remain the same. :s13: And not one of them takes public transports to work EVERYDAY. Ironic...

Quite a simple truth that is not being practice.
Capable respected leaders lead by example,
and have we see them riding a bicycle or scooter as in
the case of the late past President Ong Teng Cheong.

http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/otc19821024s.pdf
 
Last edited:

falcom2002

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2002
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
0
did Malaysia increase water price? Unlikely since our water contract with Malaysia ends 2060. So why the increase in water prize? The govt argues water price has not changed for 17 yrs. Come on, the water contract with Malaysia was signed for a duration of 100 yrs from 1962 to 2060. So the water price malaysia charging us is the same for 100 yrs!!!!! do we need more new water plants now?????? because of growing population????? technology cost would only become cheaper. if there is no urgent now, we can build more new water plants 10-20 yrs later instead of now.

It would be a grave mistake to look at the water contract
as a stronghold that everything will be safe till 2060.

The critical mass is already known about the difference
in the population, that by 2030 it is predicted that 50%
will be immigrants. Have you wonder where do all these
immigrants come from and what will they do with their
lifestyles and activities?

There are reasons for having a minority to be the next
President. Once you know the reasons you will be more
aware and be more equipped and prepared instead of
being still sleeping in the backyard.
 

xthene

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
534
Reaction score
2
It would be a grave mistake to look at the water contract
as a stronghold that everything will be safe till 2060.

The critical mass is already known about the difference
in the population, that by 2030 it is predicted that 50%
will be immigrants. Have you wonder where do all these
immigrants come from and what will they do with their
lifestyles and activities?

Currently our new water can account for 40% of our water use, desalination water about 25%, local catchment (reservoirs) ... I don't have the figure, but it should be 20-30%. Our current population should be abt 5.4-5.5m. If we keep the population at 5m, we absolutely don't have to worry about water supply.
 

Providence

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
18,172
Reaction score
0
It would be a grave mistake to look at the water contract
as a stronghold that everything will be safe till 2060.

The critical mass is already known about the difference
in the population, that by 2030 it is predicted that 50%
will be immigrants. Have you wonder where do all these
immigrants come from and what will they do with their
lifestyles and activities?

There are reasons for having a minority to be the next
President. Once you know the reasons you will be more
aware and be more equipped and prepared instead of
being still sleeping in the backyard.

Do you think the immigrants will be environmental-friendly and water-conserving people? We still have local people that waste resources like no tomorrow.

What if the immigrants also act the same? There will be no end to this.
 
Last edited:

Providence

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
18,172
Reaction score
0
Currently our new water can account for 40% of our water use, desalination water about 25%, local catchment (reservoirs) ... I don't have the figure, but it should be 20-30%. Our current population should be abt 5.4-5.5m. If we keep the population at 5m, we absolutely don't have to worry about water supply.

5 million is a huge number. The supply must meet the demand. If not, we are doomed.
 

dorst622

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
middle income PME are been ignore in this budget again.

middle income PME are been ignore in this budget again.
what do you think?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top