PoloBoiBoi
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 60,020
- Reaction score
- 18,283
got such thing meh?The pap want to tear down the lrt but the resident want to keep.
From the start in1999 already kns
The pap want to tear down the lrt but the resident want to keep. Dun waste money and bobian not enough buses. So endure this
That's the thing with pap, they never ever come clean. They never admit mistakes, they never take responsibility, and they expect progress?ut tbh, until today, i think they still haven't come clean with what is wrong with that lrt line
From what I read, is cause BP that area a lot of slopes, LRT not good for that, so keep breaking down.why even need to tear down? the problems is all system base what. just improve bus services and overhaul the entire line lor...
but tbh, until today, i think they still haven't come clean with what is wrong with that lrt line...
That's the rich for youFrom what I read, is cause BP that area a lot of slopes, LRT not good for that, so keep breaking down.
https://theindependent.sg/bplrt-political-pressure/
Khaw Boon Wan revealed a few weeks ago that the line was constructed as an āafterthought,ā under āpolitical pressure,ā admitting that he did not enjoy commuting on the line that has been built in a āmasochistic wayā:
āNo LRT is designed that way, in such a masochistic manner, where you force yourself up and down, twist and turnā¦It caused me dizzinessā¦but thatās life.ā
Ng Chee Meng clarified Khawās comments in Parliament yesterday, when he revealed that the line was constructed even though the LRT design was not suited to the terrain of Bukit Panjang:
āIn the 1990s, LTA was exploring a pilot network to bridge the last-mile gap from the MRT system and ease vehicle congestion within housing estates where population growth had stretched the road capacity. Bukit Panjang was identified in 1994 for the pilot, even though it was planned and built without LRT in mind.ā
When pressed by Workersā Party MP Pritam Singh to clarify Khawās āpolitical pressureā comment, Ng said:
āThe primary issue with the BPLRT is that the design was adapted from an airport system to a housing estate⦠It was a āstraight-lineā design which had to be adapted to undulating terrain and sharp turns.ā
That's the thing with pap, they never ever come clean. They never admit mistakes, they never take responsibility, and they expect progress?
Cannot tear. The roads around the LRT area is quite pack and jam, esp with schools, market n mall. Also not many buses into the neighbhd. Too many units in bukit panj.From the start in1999 already kns
The pap want to tear down the lrt but the resident want to keep. Dun waste money and bobian not enough buses. So endure this

Some pap ministar wanna exaggerate till say wanna teardown lahwhy even need to tear down? the problems is all system base what. just improve bus services and overhaul the entire line lor...
but tbh, until today, i think they still haven't come clean with what is wrong with that lrt line...
means have to extend platform length, also means have to extend station length, then have to redo the track switches because they are right outside the station, then have to adjust the signalling position etc etc etcCannot tear. The roads around the LRT area is quite pack and jam, esp with schools, market n mall. Also not many buses into the neighbhd. Too many units in bukit panj.
Is quite similar to SK and pungo. Jus Look at the amt of ppl taking LRT.
Actually if u look at the LRT cabin designs, 2cabins can accommodate abt 1.5x tge size of dbl decker bus load of commuters. I alwys wonder y they cant increase the 2-cabin to 3-cabin trains
