Chee Hong Tat on why public transport service standards should be separate from fare reviews

[OddEye]

Should tie le..if more breakdowns means higher fares cause need more maintainence

 

[footi3]

this joker
下台 la

 

[kuti-kuti]

Of coz not, becoz will never increase fares again if it did..... Could even decrease fares

 

[Baldylocks]

Skin thick until cannot thick

 

[radish]

wtf is this?????

is minister chee hong tat making a joke?

 

[Dhalsim]

It's becoming like a circus already. I couldn't believe what I read sia

 

[KYZT2021]

then if broken promise tied to what arh?

 

[mata_hippo]

no wonder they still have 2m salary per year


Read HWZ Forum Rules!

 

[David Lai]

It's becoming like a circus already. I couldn't believe what I read sia

when 1 rm = 1 sgd, maybe more will believe such nonsensical words will come out from their mouths…

 

[tuxguy]

Any company providing services should say their quality of services not tied to fees. Sign contract, annual will have fee increase but you must tank disruption, bad quality of service in the face of increase

 

[David Lai]

no wonder they still have 2m salary per year


Read HWZ Forum Rules!

$2M is to ensure they are not corrupt, not for their ability to lead for better tomorrow…

 

[HirotoXeno]

Power sia

Sinkies voted for this clown lol

Whats surprising? We also need to clear our own trays . Luckily no need to wash yet.

 

[week3nd]

Petition for the minister to change his name to 徐百达

 

[mirukuboi]

Of course not la
It should be tied to the CEO’s bonus

 

[timsim]

Should just keep his mouth shut lah. The incident still fresh on pple mind still dare to come out and jjww

 

[AudiA6]

Somethings you really must see/hear/read to believe right?

The song they have always been singing is higher fares are needed to improve the service levels of the PTOs what.

Why now when they don't live up to the promise and reasons for their demand in fares raises they u-turn and tell us it's got NOTHING to do with service standards and reliability?

 

[Medicated Oil]

Somethings you really must see/hear/read to believe right?

The song they have always been singing is higher fares are needed to improve the service levels of the PTOs what.

Why now when they don't live up to the promise and reasons for their demand in fares raises they u-turn and tell us it's got NOTHING to do with service standards and reliability?

They set the rules.
All of you suck thumb.
Just pay your fares and diam diam.

 

[dambio]

Public transport fares should not be tied to service levels, disruptions: Chee Hong Tat​

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...-public-transport-fares-are-set-chee-hong-tat

SINGAPORE - Public transport fares should not be tied to service levels or disruptions, Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat said in Parliament on Oct 15.

There are “other measures in place to ensure service standards are met”, he said in a ministerial statement on the massive disruption that paralysed services on a stretch of the East-West Line for six days.

Between Sept 25 and 30, there was no train service between Jurong East and Buona Vista MRT stations, after a train caused extensive damage to 2.55km of tracks and trackside equipment. About three million passengers were affected before rail services resumed on Oct 1.

Workers’ Party MP Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) had asked whether the Public Transport Council (PTC) would review its decision to increase public transport fares, on the back of one of the worst disruptions to hit Singapore’s MRT system in its 37-year history.

He also suggested considering service reliability in the period leading up to the date of the proposed fare increase as a factor in the fare adjustment formula.

From Dec 28, public transport fares will go up by 6 per cent, with each train and bus ride costing 10 cents more for adults who pay by card.

Mr Chee said that while the PTC had previously thought about linking fare reviews to disruptions and service levels, it ultimately “decided not to adopt this approach”.

Elaborating on measures in place to uphold service standards, Mr Chee said that when disruptions happen, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) “would establish the cause and accountability, and mete out penalties when necessary”.

Public transport operators that do not meet reliability targets will also miss out on payments under the Government’s incentive schemes, he added.



Mr Chee noted that the annual fare review exercise is meant to “ensure that fares keep pace with changes in operating costs, so that the public transport system remains financially sustainable”.

“If our fares are not adjusted to reflect rising operating costs, the persistent shortfall would have a chronic impact on service quality and reliability over time,” he said.

“Or if we want to continue topping up the shortfall via government subsidies, it means that taxpayers will have to foot a higher bill,” he added.

The Government will provide about $2.25 billion in the coming year to subsidise public transport operations.

Mr Giam later asked again why fare adjustments should not be linked to service reliability, saying: “How then will commuters be assured that fare increases will lead to tangible improvements in service reliability?”

In response, Mr Chee reiterated that operators are incentivised to improve their reliability and maintain a high level of service quality.

There are some “downsides” to incorporating service reliability into the fare formula, he added.

“If you hold back on the fare increases, which are supposed to reflect the overall operating costs facing the public transport system, and there’s a chronic shortfall over time, that could then further erode service quality and reliability, which I’m sure we do not want to see happen,” he said.

On costs arising from the disruption, Mr Chee said rail operator SMRT will foot the entire bill of the recent EWL disruption.

He did not provide a figure, but said it will include the cost of free bridging and regular bus services, foregone revenue for the length of the disruption and extensive repair works.

Asked about compensation for affected commuters, Mr Chee said those who exited at the stations between Boon Lay and Queenstown were not charged for their journeys.

SimplyGo, which handles for payments for public transport, has been giving refunds to passengers who were charged for two journeys instead of one as they had exceeded the 45-minute limit for transfers.

Commuters can approach SimplyGo if they have any questions about their fares, Mr Chee added.

On the ongoing probe, he said investigations should be completed in the next few months, and that LTA will “mete out penalties” if lapses are found.



Under the Rapid Transit Systems Act, rail operators can be fined a maximum of 10 per cent of their annual fare revenue for an affected rail line.

SMRT’s rail revenue for the 12 months ended March 31 stood at $886.7 million. It operates the EWL, North-South Line, Circle Line and Thomson-East Coast Line.

The operator was fined a record $5.4 million for a massive breakdown on July 7, 2015 that crippled both the North-South and East-West lines for more than two hours and affected more than 250,000 commuters.

In July 2018, LTA fined SMRT $1.5 million for a flooding incident in the tunnels between Bishan and Braddell MRT stations in October 2017. The disruption brought train services between Ang Mo Kio and Newton MRT stations to a standstill for 14½ hours, affecting about 231,000 commuters.

SMRT was also fined $2 million for two major disruptions on the North-South Line in December 2011 that affected about 221,000 commuters in total.

Then ppl pay d fares for wat? For its safety n reliability to get them to where they wanna go isn't it?

Nvmind la. U keep provide lousy service n let it breakdown. C later ppl will avoid it or not lor.

 

[testart]

I remember last time edmwers got come up with a very powerful logic until everyone bo wei gong which is

"Train service breakdown and this kind of service, you want to increase fare? Service never improve, how to increase fare?"

I find it a very powerful statement and logic and flawless

Never know today so easy rebut by CHT....

CHT...I clap for you

 

[yokine3a]

I dun understand his logic, since transport fares should tie to operating costs, then why smrt keep making profit year by year? The money they collected is more than enough to cover operating costs till they can make profit !! Then why keep increasing our fares every year?