Chee Hong Tat on why public transport service standards should be separate from fare reviews

[Clazav]

Don't adjust fare and top up using government subsidies is better lo, instead of giving what stupid CDC vouchers and gst vouchers to buy vote.

 

[Clazav]

"The operator was fined a record $5.4 million for a massive breakdown on July 7, 2015 that crippled both the North-South and East-West lines for more than two hours and affected more than 250,000 commuters."

This time is 6 days, so it is 6 x 24h = 144h.
Please fine SMRT 5.4 million x 144 / 2 = 388.8million.

 

[Joelleyuan]

wtf is this?????

is minister chee hong tat making a joke?

no, he's not making a joke,
HE IS the JOKE.

 

[thyler_koh]

Public transport fares should not be tied to service levels, disruptions: Chee Hong Tat​

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...-public-transport-fares-are-set-chee-hong-tat

SINGAPORE - Public transport fares should not be tied to service levels or disruptions, Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat said in Parliament on Oct 15.

There are “other measures in place to ensure service standards are met”, he said in a ministerial statement on the massive disruption that paralysed services on a stretch of the East-West Line for six days.

Between Sept 25 and 30, there was no train service between Jurong East and Buona Vista MRT stations, after a train caused extensive damage to 2.55km of tracks and trackside equipment. About three million passengers were affected before rail services resumed on Oct 1.

Workers’ Party MP Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) had asked whether the Public Transport Council (PTC) would review its decision to increase public transport fares, on the back of one of the worst disruptions to hit Singapore’s MRT system in its 37-year history.

He also suggested considering service reliability in the period leading up to the date of the proposed fare increase as a factor in the fare adjustment formula.

From Dec 28, public transport fares will go up by 6 per cent, with each train and bus ride costing 10 cents more for adults who pay by card.

Mr Chee said that while the PTC had previously thought about linking fare reviews to disruptions and service levels, it ultimately “decided not to adopt this approach”.

Elaborating on measures in place to uphold service standards, Mr Chee said that when disruptions happen, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) “would establish the cause and accountability, and mete out penalties when necessary”.

Public transport operators that do not meet reliability targets will also miss out on payments under the Government’s incentive schemes, he added.



Mr Chee noted that the annual fare review exercise is meant to “ensure that fares keep pace with changes in operating costs, so that the public transport system remains financially sustainable”.

“If our fares are not adjusted to reflect rising operating costs, the persistent shortfall would have a chronic impact on service quality and reliability over time,” he said.

“Or if we want to continue topping up the shortfall via government subsidies, it means that taxpayers will have to foot a higher bill,” he added.

The Government will provide about $2.25 billion in the coming year to subsidise public transport operations.

Mr Giam later asked again why fare adjustments should not be linked to service reliability, saying: “How then will commuters be assured that fare increases will lead to tangible improvements in service reliability?”

In response, Mr Chee reiterated that operators are incentivised to improve their reliability and maintain a high level of service quality.

There are some “downsides” to incorporating service reliability into the fare formula, he added.

“If you hold back on the fare increases, which are supposed to reflect the overall operating costs facing the public transport system, and there’s a chronic shortfall over time, that could then further erode service quality and reliability, which I’m sure we do not want to see happen,” he said.

On costs arising from the disruption, Mr Chee said rail operator SMRT will foot the entire bill of the recent EWL disruption.

He did not provide a figure, but said it will include the cost of free bridging and regular bus services, foregone revenue for the length of the disruption and extensive repair works.

Asked about compensation for affected commuters, Mr Chee said those who exited at the stations between Boon Lay and Queenstown were not charged for their journeys.

SimplyGo, which handles for payments for public transport, has been giving refunds to passengers who were charged for two journeys instead of one as they had exceeded the 45-minute limit for transfers.

Commuters can approach SimplyGo if they have any questions about their fares, Mr Chee added.

On the ongoing probe, he said investigations should be completed in the next few months, and that LTA will “mete out penalties” if lapses are found.



Under the Rapid Transit Systems Act, rail operators can be fined a maximum of 10 per cent of their annual fare revenue for an affected rail line.

SMRT’s rail revenue for the 12 months ended March 31 stood at $886.7 million. It operates the EWL, North-South Line, Circle Line and Thomson-East Coast Line.

The operator was fined a record $5.4 million for a massive breakdown on July 7, 2015 that crippled both the North-South and East-West lines for more than two hours and affected more than 250,000 commuters.

In July 2018, LTA fined SMRT $1.5 million for a flooding incident in the tunnels between Bishan and Braddell MRT stations in October 2017. The disruption brought train services between Ang Mo Kio and Newton MRT stations to a standstill for 14½ hours, affecting about 231,000 commuters.

SMRT was also fined $2 million for two major disruptions on the North-South Line in December 2011 that affected about 221,000 commuters in total.

“If our fares are not adjusted to reflect rising operating costs, the persistent shortfall would have a chronic impact on service quality and reliability over time,” he said.

did this clown knows what he is talking about or not .

 

[BBClone]

Sounds fair, since his pay is also not tied to his performance, otherwise he would already be eating grass.

 

[kryxwee]

So we were told.. Public transport specifically MRT, which OCT fought or in parliament, is supposed to improve the lives of our people and economy of our nation, is privatised, because we would get better services.

Then this private company cannot meet service standards, but yet can't be held accountable for it.

Because it needs to be profitable so can pay top management salaries and dividends?

Then if they don't get to be profitable, then service standards will be an issue.

Don't have a strategic mind so I don't get it.

 

[PaprikaSG]

Moi watched him yapping on TV and there's only 1 phrase can describe him:

睜 眼 説 瞎 話

smh

 

[Sillyporeboy]

If not tied to what. His neck?

 

[mickey88]

Rubbish…..this is called pay for quality service..what kind of service they provided in the first place

 

[Jian19]

This kind of clown as transport minister

 

[Suporter]

风 lumber 1 tokcoksingsong

 

[Lchlch]

This kind of clown as transport minister

So long can earn big fat profits will do.

 

[sciprof]

Means more breakdowns =more fare increase?

 

[niwde7]

Kennethjeyaratnammeme.jpg

 

[Toiletpaper80]

Chee hong talk what cock....

 

[groo-the-wanderer]

Somethings you really must see/hear/read to believe right?

The song they have always been singing is higher fares are needed to improve the service levels of the PTOs what.

Why now when they don't live up to the promise and reasons for their demand in fares raises they u-turn and tell us it's got NOTHING to do with service standards and reliability?

They flip pratas becos we voters are idiots to let them walk all over us. It’s because they are useless and incapable, that’s why remuneration shud not be tied to performance, else they all eat shat

 

[nyxator]

this is crazy sheet, expect commuters to pay more for your mistakes, everyone including the whole MOT, LTA and SMRT should cut their pay by 10% and offer free fares to commuters till year end for great inconvenience caused over the 6 days. this disruption could result in a loss of jobs and earnings for many. I know many who have to take cabs or grabs to work instead. Who compensate the commuter.. clearly CHT has no private company exp.. many ceos would have lost their jobs already


Sent from kopitiam

 

[CSI.Hippo]

Tat you lah

 

[beano]

SLA should be tied to bonuses, agree?

 

[oOsiMm]

He should draw a $3k salary as an realignment. And no, the salary doesn't reflect his poor performance, msmanagement of our transport system