Actually I was thinking of USA. Where the press is free to produce everything
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/george-floyd-investigation.html
I did wonder if the news shouldn’t have been so graphic as it led to riots in USA.  Of cos one can say cannot hide such info.  But maybe being transparent will also incite more anger
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna386141
And of cos news reports might inspire copycats
		
 
		
	 
But this does point to it being a problem with the people.
In this world today we still have the Nordic and Baltic states, we have Switzerland. Apart from rising woke levels, their people don't riot in the face of raw data. Heck, the raw data, the metrics, speak well of the kind of people they have.
Also, there's always an issue with private news outlets selling their souls to make money, and that includes propaganda, bias, graphic images that nobody should be seeing except police investigators and coroners.
By data, I really just mean a structure or system of full figures with maximum category breakdown and with oversight by 3rd-parties (data agency, auditors, a group made up of equal-ratio representatives from political parties with seats in Parliament, GovTech for the tech support, etc) that are overall preferably slightly to fully-against government interference in data. That means the role of government is ideally only to provide the man-hours that collates the data in raw format with no ifs and buts, but of course even in best-case reality it's not that simplified.
I kinda like that our Auditor-General's office still takes its oversight role quite seriously. Maybe it can be the public auditor vs the independent private auditors, for the pool of auditors in this envisioned system.