[Consolidated Thread] AMD Bulldozer, AMD Llano APU, New Brazos APU Info

Status
Not open for further replies.

batuchka

Honorary Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
104,094
Reaction score
9,385
Guess only 990FX Giga line black - 990X and lower traditional blue :p

GA-990FXA-UD3
Unt1.jpg

GA-990XA-UD3
Unt2.jpg


Pre Order in UK
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Motherboards/AMD+AM3++(900+Chipset)
990X pre order price is already lower than normal price 890GX Giga :s12::s12::s12:
Unt3.jpg
 
Last edited:

86technie

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
38,993
Reaction score
5,064
A powerful addition to Cray's line of highly-advanced supercomputers, the Cray XK6 system pairs AMD's next-generation Opteron processors with up to 16 cores code-named Interlagos powered by the Bulldozer micro-architecture (up to 96 per cabinet) and Nvidia Tesla X2090-series compute cards (up to 96 per cabinet) to create a true hybrid supercomputer with intra-node flexibility. By combining AMD Opteron processors with Nvidia GPUs, the compute node in the Cray XK6 system gives users the option to run applications with either scalar or accelerator components with up to 70TFLOPS of compute performance per cabinet. The Cray XK6 compute blades can also be blended with Cray XE6 compute blades into a single, multi-purpose supercomputing system.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/...tion_Opteron_Interlagos_and_Nvidia_Tesla.html

http://www.cray.com/Products/XK6/Specifications.aspx

AMD Bulldozer appears in this super computer!
 

snipes14

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2001
Messages
6,127
Reaction score
0
A powerful addition to Cray's line of highly-advanced supercomputers, the Cray XK6 system pairs AMD's next-generation Opteron processors with up to 16 cores code-named Interlagos powered by the Bulldozer micro-architecture (up to 96 per cabinet) and Nvidia Tesla X2090-series compute cards (up to 96 per cabinet) to create a true hybrid supercomputer with intra-node flexibility. By combining AMD Opteron processors with Nvidia GPUs, the compute node in the Cray XK6 system gives users the option to run applications with either scalar or accelerator components with up to 70TFLOPS of compute performance per cabinet. The Cray XK6 compute blades can also be blended with Cray XE6 compute blades into a single, multi-purpose supercomputing system.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/...tion_Opteron_Interlagos_and_Nvidia_Tesla.html

http://www.cray.com/Products/XK6/Specifications.aspx

AMD Bulldozer appears in this super computer!

There must be a good reason they chose it over Xeons :)
 

nuaxtreme

Banned
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
0
Nice boards, too bad no EFI bios

Don't think such things are needed. I still prefer simpler conventional BIOS I am so used to over the decades. don't need some complicated GUI stuff. Simple text based config is still the best.
 

batuchka

Honorary Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
104,094
Reaction score
9,385
Don't think such things are needed. I still prefer simpler conventional BIOS I am so used to over the decades. don't need some complicated GUI stuff. Simple text based config is still the best.

Well strictly wallet fan speaking: i see the Asus, Gigabyte fans get into debates regarding the UEFI BIOS but for me a 990XA-UD3 @ 99 Pounds = :s12::s13:=:p
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,763
Reaction score
91
Don't think such things are needed. I still prefer simpler conventional BIOS I am so used to over the decades. don't need some complicated GUI stuff. Simple text based config is still the best.

I thought the main advantage of UEFI BIOS is to improve boot up speed?
 

adrianlee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2001
Messages
20,067
Reaction score
0

snipes14

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2001
Messages
6,127
Reaction score
0
Apologies for triple posting, but this is an important bit of news that Singaporeans, being prone to the primacy and recency effect, might miss in the article I highlighted above. I just wanted to highlight it:

Just above Llano we will have the long awaited Bulldozer CPU. AMD originally wanted to launch Bulldozer at Computex but performance issues with its B0 and B1 stepping chips pushed back the launch. Now we're looking at a late July launch with B2 silicon, but performance today is a big unknown. Apparently the performance of B1 stepping silicon doesn't look too good.

The much vaulted B1 stepping isn't even that good. A stepping can boost clock speed (and thus Turbo), but can a stepping fix architectural deficiencies? To paraphrase a few people in white: "No amount of engineering can prevent a bad architecture from sucking" :D

Edit: Dang adrianlee beat me to the punch! Sometimes I think you are actually a Google news bot in disguise :p :p

我要买GT-R!;56328114 said:
.............................
pek cek la
i just hoot my rig after my CT which is next week alrdy
wait till dulan

Just go and get it. I honestly think now after all these that you can't go wrong with a i7-2600K. Even if Bulldozer is faster than it your motherboard will be compatible with Ivy Bridge, which should be extremely capable considering that it's 22nm and has tri-gate transistors.

I'm considering getting i7-2600K myself too. Just waiting until the end of Computex.

Summary: We now have news from two reputable sources (Vijay Anand and Anand Lal Shimpi) that Bulldozer's launch is pushed back. Actual market availability will most likely be even later, given that foundries need time to produce market quantities.
 
Last edited:

snipes14

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2001
Messages
6,127
Reaction score
0
我要买GT-R!;56328298 said:
not planning to OC leh...
getting 2600K advisable?

You don't plan to, but I guess a few years down the road when the i7-2600K has become a bit... Old? It can be useful. Plus now with Z68 available you have no excuse liao.

A K is only $30 more expensive than a non-K. For that $30 you get overclocking AND HD 3000 (with 12 vs 6 Execution Units IIRC), which presumably plays a performance role in Quick Sync, which might be useful should they improve the algorithm further. I think it's worthwhile.

Is it any wonder I'm training to be a Systems Analyst with the amount of thought I put into EVERYTHING?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top