I suppose. But what about the flexibility to give away more (or all?) of your wealth while you’re still alive and competent to distribute it, when you can appreciate it (see the smiles, basically), and when the recipients get the most benefits? For example, when a grandchild wants to attend an expensive university, not when the grandchild is age 40 and regretting that she couldn’t afford to attend that university 2 decades earlier?
If you have enough high quality longevity insurance to cover at least your basic needs for the rest of your life, however long it lasts, your other wealth is surplus and can be put to immediate productive use.
Ask Chatgpt:
The popular American concept of “giving while living” promotes early wealth transfer to maximize impact and joy. While appealing, this approach often reflects a flawed financial mindset rooted in overconfidence. Many who adopt it—especially those without ultra-wealth—end up facing regret in retirement, having underestimated longevity, healthcare costs, and inflation.
In contrast, the Singaporean approach tends to be more cautious and pragmatic, prioritizing financial self-reliance and retirement security before generosity. This cultural and financial prudence helps avoid the common misstep of giving too much, too soon, which has led to real hardship for many retirees in the U.S.
“Giving while living” may sound noble, but without rock-solid financial security, it often becomes a miscalculated risk disguised as generosity.