300k cash 10 years earn nothing. Sound about right for all those silly people hoarding cash in their bank accounts.
you are so right. 300k earning 0.05%? you another seow kia
300k cash 10 years earn nothing. Sound about right for all those silly people hoarding cash in their bank accounts.
you are so right. 300k earning 0.05%? you another seow kia
THEMIKOS was just stating arbitrary figures to explain why he thinks the incurred interest (from using CPF to by house) equates to 'loss of interest', and that you will stand to profit more if you use cash (due to govt paying you interest in ur CPF simply).
You were the one who started drifting off course by stating Case 1 & Case 2 with different principal. And since you think you are right, where do you infer from his post that he was comparing between different scenarios with different principal? I simply used my own sets of arbitrary figures to further reinforce his views on the incurred interest resulting in a loss of interest by correcting on your flawed assumption of comparing 2 cases with different principal.
Although I used different figures, but so what? As long as it illustrate the point fairly and correctly, anything goes. This is not an exam. There's no model answer, it is not the case where there is only 1 right answer.![]()
That's his assumption mah, not mine.
Although I used different figures, but so what? As long as it illustrate the point fairly and correctly, anything goes. This is not an exam. There's no model answer, it is not the case where there is only 1 right answer.![]()
Accured interest exclude compounding would be 2.5% x 300k x 10 = 75k.
THEMIKOS was just stating arbitrary figures to explain why he thinks the incurred interest (from using CPF to by house) equates to 'loss of interest', and that you will stand to profit more if you use cash (due to govt paying you interest in ur CPF simply).
You were the one who started drifting off course by stating Case 1 & Case 2 with different principal. And since you think you are right, where do you infer from his post that he was comparing between different scenarios with different principal? I simply used my own sets of arbitrary figures to further reinforce his views on the incurred interest resulting in a loss of interest by correcting on your flawed assumption of comparing 2 cases with different principal.
Although I used different figures, but so what? As long as it illustrate the point fairly and correctly, anything goes. This is not an exam. There's no model answer, it is not the case where there is only 1 right answer.![]()
bye.....and how could you exclude the effects of compounding.
2.5% compounding for 10 years is significant. it amounts to 84k, much higher than the 75k you did.
your 75k is meaningless, same as the 20k used by thermikos. since they are all meaningless, why cant you use 20k instead
Pls grow up and get a life.... I don't think u fully understand the real meaning of assumption. Assumptions are to make things simpler. I've already made my point very clear - the examples we gave, are trying to prove our stand on incurred interest.
Thanks for taking the effort to calculate the compounded interest. U sure the total interest is $85,000 only? Whole figure so nice? Since u keep harping about the small details, why not just put in the exact amount to make things complete?
Ok, I'm done bickering with you over this... I feel so immature now. Thanks for making me feel young again!bye.....
Chill guys madtari and dork32. My figures were indeed anyhow plucked one, i didnt do any proper calculations on the interest like the "20k"-just an imaginary accrued interest number.
My main point was to show this statement as explained by madtari
THEMIKOS was just stating arbitrary figures to explain why he thinks the incurred interest (from using CPF to by house) equates to 'loss of interest', and that you will stand to profit more if you use cash (due to govt paying you interest in ur CPF simply).
Cheers and have a great week ahead.
If you say as long as don't sell the house, the accrued interest is not a problem. May I clarify what happens after the house owner passed away? The accrued interests also get write off?

You all stop arguing la. Who can answer the above question then is considered CPF expert.
![]()
THEMIKOS was just stating arbitrary figures to explain why he thinks the incurred interest (from using CPF to by house) equates to 'loss of interest', and that you will stand to profit more if you use cash (due to govt paying you interest in ur CPF simply).
You all stop arguing la. Who can answer the above question then is considered CPF expert.
![]()
You all stop arguing la. Who can answer the above question then is considered CPF expert.
![]()
dork states that using cpf instead of paying cash, will make you cash rich. this cash can be put into relative safe instruments and earn interest close to that of oa.
eg dork has 2 uob1 account (150k at 2.4%), 3 dbs multiplier (150k at 2.3%) and one maybank saveup (60k at 3%). all these amounts to 360k, more than the 300k you have stated. the average returns is close to 2.5% from oa.
other options include ocbc360, citi maxigain, scb bonus saver and boc smartsaver
instead of garmen paying you interest, it is the banks that are paying you interest.
cash can be used to purchase anything. cpf can only be used to purchase property. i rather have 300k cash than 300k oa
Dork.... stop it... don't be a cock and make urself sound stupid. Read the T&Cs... u can't have multiple accounts for UOB ONE, OCBC 360 etc. And assuming you can have so many accounts, to hit those max interest rates, u need to be spending like crazy on your credit cards.![]()
Gosh... you have gone too far to compare risk free, care free interest of 2.5% in cpf with those savings accounts which requires conditions to be met and they r always subjected to changes every now and then... ur suggestions are really getting from bad to worse...