reddevil0728
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
- Messages
- 65,817
- Reaction score
- 5,721
That would be a good idea to increase your CPF and get 4% interest + tax relief. why?Anyone here top up SA to get tax relief?
That would be a good idea to increase your CPF and get 4% interest + tax relief. why?Anyone here top up SA to get tax relief?
I don't disagree. But I have found that there are people who are willing to put money into CPF but not so willing to invest on their own. Others may appreciate the relative safety of money in CPF before they risk their assets on the market.
In any case, the question was about VC to MA or RSTU to SA first. Between the two, I think it makes more sense to VC to MA first.
Once you earn about 6k/mth, you would prob hit the max CPF annual limit with a decent bonus. At that point, VC to MA is no longer a realistic option.
In that sense, VC to MA should take place when one is younger and not yet hitting the CPF annual limit.

The game has changed/is changing, though, in at least these respects:
1. MediShield Life and Integrated Shield premiums are higher and climbing;
2. Medical costs are rising rather quickly, with more opportunities (or requirements) to spend more from MediSave;
3. The Basic Healthcare Sum (BHS) is rising faster than the BRS/FRS/ERS;
4. CareShield Life premiums are compulsory from age 30 for younger cohorts;
5. Since compensation is generally rising, it's getting tougher sooner to squeeze a MediSave voluntary contribution within the CPF Annual Limit;
6. Some people work for Additional MediSave Contribution Scheme (AMCS) employers, which also effectively limits MediSave top up opportunities.
"It's complicated." My fundamental view is that the tax relief is nice, but it shouldn't be the only consideration. I do see some value in MediSave's relative liquidity for a typical early to mid working career individual. So I like leaning into MediSave at the beginning, to a degree.
When you are chronically sick.
BHS over the years:
- 2015 - 48,500
- 2016 - 49,800 +2.7%
- 2017 - 52,000 +4.4%
- 2018 - 54,500 +4.8%
- 2019 - 57,200 +5.0%
- 2020 - 60,000 +4.9%
- 2021 - 63,000 +5.0%
Well, the compulsory contribution rates for age 55+ members and their employers are going to increase over the next decade, starting with the first increments on January 1, 2021. Even so, we’re probably getting near a general hike in the contribution limit since the last time it happened was way back on January 1, 2016. The government announced the hike to $37,740 in late February, 2015. Let’s see if CPF has an announcement to make in February, 2021.I think it's about time G look at increasing the CPF annual limit to be in tandem with the increase in BRS FRS ERS and BHS. Maybe can increase CPF ceiling from $6k to $7k.
Even for BTOs, the ceiling is getting higher. up to 14k for HDB and 16k for ECs. Doesn't make sense for the CPF ceiling to be kept as is to meet all of the rising costs above.
Well, the compulsory contribution rates for age 55+ members and their employers are going to increase over the next decade, starting with the first increments on January 1, 2021. Even so, we’re probably getting near a general hike in the contribution limit since the last time it happened was way back on January 1, 2016. The government announced the hike to $37,740 in late February, 2015. Let’s see if CPF has an announcement to make in February, 2021.
If/when there is a general hike, maybe it’d make sense to increase variable pay contributions more than base salary contributions. Today the $37,740 figure is based on 17 months at $6,000/month. How about 18 months at $7,000/month, which would translate to a CPF Annual Limit of $46,620?
Even with private integrated shield plans? Wipe out?
CPF MA interests not enough to move in tandem
Hullo. Just wanted to check something.
I know there's a CPF Life estimator out there, and making some assumptions (FRS to rise by 3% each year), we can get a range of payouts for all 3 plans (Basic, Standard, Escalating), and at different payout starting age (65 or 70).
My question is, is there a way for me to estimate payouts if I plan to continue topping up my RA after 55?
The estimator requires us to input how much we have in RA at 55, but what if we continue to top-up to prevailing FRS/ERS even after that? Is there a way to estimate what the payout would be if we choose that route?
You reverse engineer (find the compounded amount at the end of 65) to 55.
Its an estimate but, betrer than nothing.
Hullo. Just wanted to check something.
I know there's a CPF Life estimator out there, and making some assumptions (FRS to rise by 3% each year), we can get a range of payouts for all 3 plans (Basic, Standard, Escalating), and at different payout starting age (65 or 70).
My question is, is there a way for me to estimate payouts if I plan to continue topping up my RA after 55?
The estimator requires us to input how much we have in RA at 55, but what if we continue to top-up to prevailing FRS/ERS even after that? Is there a way to estimate what the payout would be if we choose that route?
Don’t get you