CPF Reforms

culture_counter

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
667
Reaction score
13
Do you agree with Workers' Party stand on CPF as quoted:-


"CPF Reforms

Our MPs spoke extensively about retirement adequacy and raised concerns that the existing CPF Scheme does not provide assurance of full retirement adequacy for the lowest income groups, including homemakers and people with disabilities. More can be done to ensure that our citizens are better-positioned to live out their retirement years with dignity.

MP for Hougang Png Eng Huat, MPs for Aljunied GRC Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap and Chen Show Mao, and Non-Constituency MP Gerald Giam proposed that that there be more flexibility in the Draw-Down Age (now known as the Payout Eligibility Age). Currently, CPF members can only start drawing down their CPF when they reach the Payout Eligibility Age, which will be 65 from 2018. However, to support CPF members who genuinely require monthly payouts before age 65, our MPs called for the Payout Eligibility Age to be lowered to 60.[1]



Our MPs reiterated earlier calls for the Payout Eligibility Age to be de-linked from Retirement and Re-employment Ages. Presently, the Payout Eligibility Age has been increasing together with the Re-employment Age, but an increase in the Re-employment Age does not guarantee that everyone will be able to work until 65 or will be offered re-employment. Furthermore, Png Eng Huat and Gerald Giam pointed out that the statutory Retirement Age is now only 62, leaving a gap of 3 years a retiree will need to tide over if he or she is unable to secure employment or re-employment. Muhamad Faisal and Chen Show Mao emphasised that fixing the Payout Eligibility Age at 60 would provide greater assurance to members and help them in planning for their retirement.

Our MPs highlighted the difficulty in understanding the CPF Scheme due to technical jargon and different standards that apply to people with different birth years. With greater choices provided in the CPF scheme, it is important that CPF members are given enough time and information to understand the full implications of their choices."
 

foosoomin

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
24,773
Reaction score
0
No understand.



I only understand what the late Mr Ong Teng Cheong said
 

yukari_san3

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
9,178
Reaction score
0
but PAP says CPF is to help you retire.

Straits Times also says So.



Why reform?

Trust PAP.

Vote for PAP!
 

runforyourlife

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
47,205
Reaction score
5,219
from the text alone, its just a shift in number.

whats impt is the entire application.
 

CAShop

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,410
Reaction score
0
Notice how none of them are stupid enough to give some EDMWers what they want, withdraw full sum at 55. In principle they agree with what CPF is doing but wants more flexibility
 

satayxp

Banned
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
151,812
Reaction score
5,156
Notice how none of them are stupid enough to give some EDMWers what they want, withdraw full sum at 55. In principle they agree with what CPF is doing but wants more flexibility

so u sarpork WP now?! wahahahahaha!!! :s13:
 

CAShop

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,410
Reaction score
0
so u sarpork WP now?! wahahahahaha!!! :s13:

All their ideas have been mentioned by PAP MPs at one point or another. Why do I need to support an incompetent version of PAP. I rather just vote for the best party in this GE, PPP
 

satayxp

Banned
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
151,812
Reaction score
5,156
All their ideas have been mentioned by PAP MPs at one point or another. Why do I need to support an incompetent version of PAP. I rather just vote for the best party in this GE, PPP

rly? u mean PAP will agree lowering current payout age from 65 to 60?? u say one ah?

vote more oppo into parliament n u just might see it happen... otherwise wait nong nong! :s13:
people's power ~!
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top