cancer81
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 61,055
- Reaction score
- 0
you taking this way too far.
some ppl seem to suggest that not having a casino would have prevented this individual from using government funds to fuel his gambling habit.
it could have been anything. He could have traded forex, commodities or stocks lost and then started using monies that do not belong to him and pocketing the profits himself.
Heck, he could have simply spent the monies on himself. Case in point, the dude who bought a Ferrari for himself??
if that had happened, we should close the stock exchange? BTW civil servants are allowed to make investments, they have to declare all investments and debts annually.
I know that you will probably say with a casino right in their faces, normal mortal civil servants will be more easily tempted into gambling and more likely to succumb to the temptation of "borrowing" department funds. The same goes for everything else then.
some ppl seem to suggest that not having a casino would have prevented this individual from using government funds to fuel his gambling habit.
it could have been anything. He could have traded forex, commodities or stocks lost and then started using monies that do not belong to him and pocketing the profits himself.
Heck, he could have simply spent the monies on himself. Case in point, the dude who bought a Ferrari for himself??
if that had happened, we should close the stock exchange? BTW civil servants are allowed to make investments, they have to declare all investments and debts annually.
I know that you will probably say with a casino right in their faces, normal mortal civil servants will be more easily tempted into gambling and more likely to succumb to the temptation of "borrowing" department funds. The same goes for everything else then.

