[CROWDSOURCE] Endowment maturity value across insurers

sohguanh

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
9,460
Reaction score
3,202
Just curious I have an old Income endowment plan (bought in 1993) and I compare to the recent Income endowment plan I have and not sure upon maturity do they refer to same thing.

Old plan. It determine maturity as below
Basic - refer to sum assured and this is guaranteed
Bonus - non-guaranteed and I assume this is the yearly Reversionary Bonus
Spec Bonus - non-guaranteed and I assume this is the Terminal bonus

New plan. It determine maturity as below
Maturity which is NOT sum assured. It is based on total premiums paid PLUS extra and this is guaranteed
Reversionary Bonus non-guaranteed
Terminal bonus non-guaranteed

It seem old plan upon maturity are so much better as it is based on sum assured and not total premiums paid.
 

zeroX26

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
6,185
Reaction score
3,139
Just curious I have an old Income endowment plan (bought in 1993) and I compare to the recent Income endowment plan I have and not sure upon maturity do they refer to same thing.

Old plan. It determine maturity as below
Basic - refer to sum assured and this is guaranteed
Bonus - non-guaranteed and I assume this is the yearly Reversionary Bonus
Spec Bonus - non-guaranteed and I assume this is the Terminal bonus

New plan. It determine maturity as below
Maturity which is NOT sum assured. It is based on total premiums paid PLUS extra and this is guaranteed
Reversionary Bonus non-guaranteed
Terminal bonus non-guaranteed

It seem old plan upon maturity are so much better as it is based on sum assured and not total premiums paid.
That's becoz the funds these old plans invested in experienced exponential growth in the 90s till mid 00s along with the rise of the global economy what. The funds new plans invest in are younger and we are talking about a much more mature economy with significantly slower growth. That's why I find it not meaningful to compare very old plans against much newer ones.
 

sohguanh

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
9,460
Reaction score
3,202
That's becoz the funds these old plans invested in experienced exponential growth in the 90s till mid 00s along with the rise of the global economy what. The funds new plans invest in are younger and we are talking about a much more mature economy with significantly slower growth. That's why I find it not meaningful to compare very old plans against much newer ones.
Ok noted so a more meaningful comparison would be different insurers old plan (one group) and then different insurers new plan (one group) total two groups.
 

zeroX26

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
6,185
Reaction score
3,139
Ok noted so a more meaningful comparison would be different insurers old plan (one group) and then different insurers new plan (one group) total two groups.
Yes, or you can compare old against new to see longitudinal changes in return differences.
 

sohguanh

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
9,460
Reaction score
3,202
Yes, or you can compare old against new to see longitudinal changes in return differences.
I already compared the old plan maturity guaranteed vs new plan maturity guaranteed and old plan wins but you say not apple to apple comparison. As for RB old plan is giving me 1.5% annually but new plan 0.70%. Again old plan wins. So think need to have same group to be fair comparison.
 

zeroX26

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
6,185
Reaction score
3,139
I already compared the old plan maturity guaranteed vs new plan maturity guaranteed and old plan wins but you say not apple to apple comparison. As for RB old plan is giving me 1.5% annually but new plan 0.70%. Again old plan wins. So think need to have same group to be fair comparison.
I said not to compare which is better. You still use the data to demonstrate the magnitude of the decline. That's what I meant by longitudinal tracking.
 

blurpandasg2014

Master Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
415
Just curious I have an old Income endowment plan (bought in 1993) and I compare to the recent Income endowment plan I have and not sure upon maturity do they refer to same thing.

Old plan. It determine maturity as below
Basic - refer to sum assured and this is guaranteed
Bonus - non-guaranteed and I assume this is the yearly Reversionary Bonus
Spec Bonus - non-guaranteed and I assume this is the Terminal bonus

New plan. It determine maturity as below
Maturity which is NOT sum assured. It is based on total premiums paid PLUS extra and this is guaranteed
Reversionary Bonus non-guaranteed
Terminal bonus non-guaranteed

It seem old plan upon maturity are so much better as it is based on sum assured and not total premiums paid.
The sum assured shown in new plan are solely for determination/computation of RB and TB.

RB/TB rates can be found on income website https://www.income.com.sg/NTUCIncom...s-Publications/Declared-Bonus-Info-YE2020.pdf
 

blurpandasg2014

Master Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
415
Huge cut in Terminal bonus by GE!

Plans projection affected drastically. Updated file
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top