snowblaze
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 16,141
- Reaction score
- 7,133
SA pros: can withdraw after age 55 if confident to reach FRS before 55, withdrawals not taxable
SA cons: limited access to invest so probably just get 4% interest, policy risk cus FRS increases every year (resulting in lower withdrawals after 55)
SRS pros: can invest in more asset classes and give higher long term returns (eg; 8% pa if world ETF), flexible withdrawals before age 63 (subjected to tax and 5% penalty)
SRS cons: withdrawal without 5% penalty is later than CPF, withdrawals still subjected to 50% tax after age 63 (have to consider if you want to continue working after age 63)
So it depends. But if I'm young, I would prefer SRS cus of the higher potential long term returns which makes a huge difference when compounded over a long period of time.
The main use of SRS is to increase tax relief component to reduce some taxes. I feel this will be most suitable for working adults around 30s and above on assumption they are earning an income amount which attracts higher tax brackets, hence, the incentive to reduce some tax and use that SRS to invest.
For those who just started working in their early 20s to late 20s, I assume they shouldn't have much tax burdens and therefore, investing the money directly would be more suitable.
Shifu at which income tax rate would be ideal to top-up to SRS if I were to take out before retirement age? Assume that I take out when I have no income at all.If you see yourself jobless soon, think twice before lock your money in SRS.
5% penalty plus entire amount is fully taxable.
If the amount to be taken out per annum will be below <$20k, then could I say as long as my income tax rate when I top up is at least 5%, so that to cover the 5% penalty ?
I am assuming I no income in this scenario. For example, I must take out the SRS because lost my job in my 50s or have terminal illness before retirement age.