is the 4% guaranteed?
hahaha current surrender values shows 4% pa since I bought, the longer one holds, the better the surrender values, hahaha
is the 4% guaranteed?
hahaha no thanks, moi sufficiently covered, dun believe in throwing away money to insurance, moi pay a fixed premium but my coverage auto increase over the years with money earning 4% on maturity or shld moi surrender for retirement, hahaha
Your coverage is obviously not 1mil. If the person needs a 1mil cover, should he get a 1mil whole life?
hahaha u are IFA, u shld answer your own question, so what alternative solutions are available? hahaha

Thats why term is important, my friend. You just brush it aside like its totally useless and a waste of money.![]()
hahaha u cannot even answer the question, u brush it aside hor hahaha
what is important and not a waste of money, buy for greed and fear? hahaha
You still don't understand. You cannot rely fully on a whole life plan to have sufficient cover. If a person who has a family needing a million dollar cover, you need term and it is not a waste of money. You can add a whole life but it is a small part of the cover.
hahaha no wan to waste time on marketing tactics of insurance co, focusing on greed and fear, who wants the 1million and how many really get paid the 1million, hahaha
If it's a 1 million coverage for death, i believe the definition for death is quite clear cut, they will have to pay the 1 million no matter what isn't it? The dependants are the ones who will benefit of course.
I remember someone saying that DPS had a tighter definition for "incapacity" for making claims. That seems to have been changed:
Claim criteria widened for two CPF insurance schemes
"Central Provident Fund (CPF) members with terminal illness and total permanent disability but are still able to work will qualify for claims under the Home Protection Scheme (HPS) and Dependants’ Protection Scheme (DPS), after Parliament passed changes to the definition of “incapacity” under the CPF Act on Monday (Feb 29)."

I remember someone saying that DPS had a tighter definition for "incapacity" for making claims. That seems to have been changed:
Claim criteria widened for two CPF insurance schemes
"Central Provident Fund (CPF) members with terminal illness and total permanent disability but are still able to work will qualify for claims under the Home Protection Scheme (HPS) and Dependants’ Protection Scheme (DPS), after Parliament passed changes to the definition of “incapacity” under the CPF Act on Monday (Feb 29)."
My dad received a letter from NTUC that his DPS has been terminated because he has reached the maximum age for the policy, meaning all the money he paid go down to drain?![]()
My dad received a letter from NTUC that his DPS has been terminated because he has reached the maximum age for the policy, meaning all the money he paid go down to drain?![]()
Isn't it good news?

My dad received a letter from NTUC that his DPS has been terminated because he has reached the maximum age for the policy, meaning all the money he paid go down to drain?![]()
You (and your dad) got to understand that DPS is a yearly renewable term insurance and for term insurance, it is a pure expense.My dad received a letter from NTUC that his DPS has been terminated because he has reached the maximum age for the policy, meaning all the money he paid go down to drain?![]()
oic, i thought insurance is meant to cover till one pass on, but what happened if one is sick after the maximum age?![]()