WussRedXLi
Greater Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2001
- Messages
- 89,425
- Reaction score
- 9,755
Just tried the Waterpik WF-03 with pik pocket periodontal tips.....
For interproximal areas, you could just fit the pik pocket tips right into the gap to clean easily....felt that it almost "glides" in. Very smooth action.
Turn on the power, really can feel the force even at a lower frequency (Vs the Panasonic with jet tip) and lower PSI. Don't get me wrong, i presume that lower frequency = slower piston speed = lower PSI.
But still the power feels nearly the same, in fact i'd say that with the periodontal tip it feels a bit more powerful as the tip needle-thin nozzle really gets into there and none of that power is wasted as in the case of the Panasonic.
When guiding along the gum line (sulcus), can also feel this true power despite the lower frequency and PSI. Literally can feel the pulses expanding and contracting that you don't get with the Panasonic.
Is it more effective? Theorectically from what i read, the tip works best in site-specific applications, eg esp those with deep pockets (antibiotic and cleaning solutions used) and anecdotally has even helped people who are advised to go for periodontal surgery to avoid it....and it not only stops there, they even made a full recovery at home with just in-office visits done for checking (no in-office treatment).
But one important aspect is this, you'd need a longer time with the pik pocket to really accurately run just beneath the gum line called the gum sulcus. So expect to spend more time with this pik pocket tip. It's designed to be site specific use to be more effective at problem areas
Other than the testimonials, many randomized clinical trials from clinical research also show that they work when used properly and religiously. The earlier you control your deeper pockets, the easier and shorter the recovery time.
For interproximal areas, you could just fit the pik pocket tips right into the gap to clean easily....felt that it almost "glides" in. Very smooth action.
Turn on the power, really can feel the force even at a lower frequency (Vs the Panasonic with jet tip) and lower PSI. Don't get me wrong, i presume that lower frequency = slower piston speed = lower PSI.
But still the power feels nearly the same, in fact i'd say that with the periodontal tip it feels a bit more powerful as the tip needle-thin nozzle really gets into there and none of that power is wasted as in the case of the Panasonic.
When guiding along the gum line (sulcus), can also feel this true power despite the lower frequency and PSI. Literally can feel the pulses expanding and contracting that you don't get with the Panasonic.
Is it more effective? Theorectically from what i read, the tip works best in site-specific applications, eg esp those with deep pockets (antibiotic and cleaning solutions used) and anecdotally has even helped people who are advised to go for periodontal surgery to avoid it....and it not only stops there, they even made a full recovery at home with just in-office visits done for checking (no in-office treatment).
But one important aspect is this, you'd need a longer time with the pik pocket to really accurately run just beneath the gum line called the gum sulcus. So expect to spend more time with this pik pocket tip. It's designed to be site specific use to be more effective at problem areas
Other than the testimonials, many randomized clinical trials from clinical research also show that they work when used properly and religiously. The earlier you control your deeper pockets, the easier and shorter the recovery time.
Last edited: