Enquiry regarding UOL

[MuggerX]

Hi guys I have two questions to ask regarding UOL

1) Is a GPA of 2.5 eligible to enter UOL with the current standard?


2) Is it possible to take PT in UOL and convert to FT mid way?

Thanks a lot in advance!

 

[sacredrays]

yes and yes. one thing: apply early, don't wait till the last minute.

 

[intime]

Hi guys I have two questions to ask regarding UOL

1) Is a GPA of 2.5 eligible to enter UOL with the current standard?

2) Is it possible to take PT in UOL and convert to FT mid way?

Thanks a lot in advance!

Are you taking UOL degree through SIMGE?
If yes, I suggest taking other foreign degrees in SIMGE instead. Example degrees from renown research groups, Sheffield, Birmingham, Manchester (Russell Group). Or Buffalo (AAU)

Or UniSIM PT if you are looking for better opportunities in the public sector.

 

[MuggerX]

Are you taking UOL degree through SIMGE?
If yes, I suggest taking other foreign degrees in SIMGE instead. Example degrees from renown research groups, Sheffield, Birmingham, Manchester (Russell Group). Or Buffalo (AAU)

Or UniSIM PT if you are looking for better opportunities in the public sector.

Yes I am taking UOL thru SIM GE... Hmm isn't UOl one of the more recognized degree in SIM? Well I wanted to take PT then convert to to FT next year cos I ORD next year in dec, wanted to save time cos im in a stay out unit anyway.

 

[chiwawa23]

Yes I am taking UOL thru SIM GE... Hmm isn't UOl one of the more recognized degree in SIM? Well I wanted to take PT then convert to to FT next year cos I ORD next year in dec, wanted to save time cos im in a stay out unit anyway.

Both answers are yes. UOL is definitely one of the more recognised university.

 

[MuggerX]

Both answers are yes. UOL is definitely one of the more recognised university.

Well I did some research and I saw that UniSim PT may be a better choice.. considering the fact that its much cheaper ( 14k + compared to UOL 26k), but the Unisim PT does not come with an honors for all the programmes. I don tink there is much diff between PT and FT right beside one is morning and one is evening. I guess there are many poly peeps out there like me with a half hanging gpa that dono where to go aft army =(

 

[applebig]

Well I did some research and I saw that UniSim PT may be a better choice.. considering the fact that its much cheaper ( 14k + compared to UOL 26k), but the Unisim PT does not come with an honors for all the programmes. I don tink there is much diff between PT and FT right beside one is morning and one is evening. I guess there are many poly peeps out there like me with a half hanging gpa that dono where to go aft army =(

bro im just like u. GPA 2.9. dk where to go after army. dk how the entire thing work, like when i should apply for uni, do i apply for loan first or apply after i get a loan, which uni would be better and which subject to study.

 

[intime]

Yes I am taking UOL thru SIM GE... Hmm isn't UOl one of the more recognized degree in SIM? Well I wanted to take PT then convert to to FT next year cos I ORD next year in dec, wanted to save time cos im in a stay out unit anyway.

I have a different opinion on the UOL,

I do agree that UOL is recognised, in terms of,
- UOL programmes are available in many countries.
- To study an UOL degree does not need a teaching institution.
- Their curriculum is made by UOL's various lead colleges, that includes, top UK university LSE.
- It is convenient and many people have graduated from UOL worldwide.

But, the degree is awarded by University of London.
EMFSS Access New: Title and characteristics of the programme
- It is not awarded by the lead colleges say LSE. LSE award its own degrees, different from UOL.
- UOL is not a ranked university in any charts.
- Because it does not need an institution to study, and even though you may study at SIM GE, it still gives off a general impression of "online degree".
- UOL degree only have 12 modules, any local degree would give you more than 24 modules, thus the rigour curriculum.

Why I suggest Sheffield, Birmingham, Manchester because of brand name,
- They are part of an elite UK group - Russell Group that includes top UK universities like Oxford, Cambridge and LSE etc...
Russell Group: Our Universities
- They are ranked universities in THE and QS charts.
- If you search UK's university admission news, you will find that people over at UK aspires to enter Oxbridge or Russell Group universities.
BBC News - Is the Russell Group really an 'oligarchy'?
http://www.theguardian.com/educatio...up-competition-for-top-students-numbers-limit

Why I suggest Buffalo because it is part of AAU a leading USA research group that includes the ivy leagues.
- Part of Association of American Universities (AAU) group
- It is a ranked university in THE and QS charts.
- Their degrees are 3 to 4 year programmes.
- The number of modules can easily exceed 24.

I have to say this... don't rush. See carefully, decide carefully. You can wait till you finish your NS, then apply. If you want to quench your academic desires, you can look into free courses in Edx, Coursera and FutureLearn.

bro im just like u. GPA 2.9. dk where to go after army. dk how the entire thing work, like when i should apply for uni, do i apply for loan first or apply after i get a loan, which uni would be better and which subject to study.

What you need to do is,
- Take a look at SIMGE, PSB, MDIS, Kaplan, and decide which degree fits your career ambitions.
- See their admission requirements. Meet the requirements?
- Then apply to the degree in that institution.
- Then look for financial assistance or tuition loans on the institution website, see the requirements and instructions on does it require you to get an offer first or can apply at the same time as admission application.
- Any questions, quickly email the institution to clarify directly.

You can look at UniSIM's PT degrees as well.

 

[lolita_5]

anything but buffalo

it's so expensive and still a paper after all, i can probably get 3 uol certs for the price of one buffalo

 

[Successor.]

100% possible. There are people with GPA2.0 also got enrolled. I heard UOL accepts 1.9 as well.

UOLIP as long got money, can go. That is the reality after been in the program for the last 2 years.

 

[arcanum00]

"- UOL degree only have 12 modules, any local degree would give you more than 24 modules, thus the rigour curriculum."

Oh my! Then I should inform my cousins going to Cambridge, Oxford and the LSE to withdraw from their courses.

Cambridge's Tripos doesn't even have modules! Only four papers in a year. That's about twelve in three years! How terrible! So little, right?

Also, Oxford and the LSE have less than half the number of modules than what the local universities are offering. Their students must have learned very little.

*
Can "rigour curriculum" be determined just like that?

Does the content in similar "modules" of different universities approximately equal in terms of breadth and depth?

Did you compare the content for each "module", and the similar degree programmes in general to compare the learning outcome?

This statement of yours doesn't sound true.

 

[intime]

"- UOL degree only have 12 modules, any local degree would give you more than 24 modules, thus the rigour curriculum."

Oh my! Then I should inform my cousins going to Cambridge, Oxford and the LSE to withdraw from their courses.

Cambridge's Tripos doesn't even have modules! Only four papers in a year. That's about twelve in three years! How terrible! So little, right?

Also, Oxford and the LSE have less than half the number of modules than what the local universities are offering. Their students must have learned very little.

*
Can "rigour curriculum" be determined just like that?

Does the content in similar "modules" of different universities approximately equal in terms of breadth and depth?

Did you compare the content for each "module", and the similar degree programmes in general to compare the learning outcome?

This statement of yours doesn't sound true.

Some universities have a different course structure, where their courses are not count by modules.
And in some course structure, their modules may be studied for 2 terms.

The statement I listed is just one of the many considerations for choosing a good degree.
- As it is a statement that describes the most common course structure. Total 2 terms per year. 1 module only last 1 term. 1 term may consist of 4-5 modules. 3 year course would be 24+ modules.
- It is the most easiest way to determine the curriculum rigour, when a person is not resourceful enough to find the individual course content to compare word by word.
- If someone is studying in a top UK university, by all means go ahead, as there are many other factors that lead to choosing that university.

Even if I compare UOL modules' content word by word and it comes out to be true that one module is comparable to 2 modules locally.
UOL is still not the best choice university to study in, when there are better renown university courses to choose from in a few of the private institutions, based on many other factors.

 

[MuggerX]

Thanks guys for the advices here, I did some research these few days and decided that unisim PT may be the better option for me. Altho it's PT and classes are at night, I think taking it as a full time course and taking the max credit unit every semester. Just thinking what are some of the reasons sim ge would be chose over unisim in any scenario?

 

[arcanum00]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]I do suspect that local graduates have advantages in employment opportunities and career advancements over UOLIP graduates; and I do not dispute that local, or foreign universities offered through private educational institutions, can provide good higher education, and to fulfill certain objectives. However, I disagree with you that "rigour curriculum" can be determined easily from the number of modules taught in a degree programme; that "Even if I compare UOL modules' content word by word and it comes out to be true that one module is comparable to 2 modules locally."; and that "UOL is still not the best choice university to study in, when there are better renown university courses to choose from in a few of the private institutions, based on many other factors.". [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]"The statement I listed is just one of the many considerations for choosing a good degree.- As it is a statement that describes the most common course structure. Total 2 terms per year. 1 module only last 1 term. 1 term may consist of 4-5 modules. 3 year course would be 24+ modules.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]- It is the most easiest way to determine the curriculum rigour, when a person is not resourceful enough to find the individual course content to compare word by word."[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]--> This easy way may be flawed. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]UK universities usually do not have "modules", like the General Education modules in the NUS or in the UB, as part of the degree requirements. And[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] we cannot really say that without the provision of such modules, the curriculum in the UK degree programmes are not rigour. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]As mentioned, LSE students read twelve courses and Oxford students read roughly the same number of courses. Using your "conversion system", they would have read less in content than local graduates with General Education modules. This may not even be true for similar programmes compared when General Education modules are included. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]UK degrees are, in general, narrower in scope but focus in-depth on a subject. We seldom, or never, will see UK students are approved to take, say, Art Appreciation in an Economics degree. [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Hence, one might view the students in Cambridge as having learned "more" in Mathematics than students in the [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]US, despite the lack of General Education modules, since some courses offered at undergraduate level in Cambridge are only offered at graduate level in the US. You may also want to note[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] that Mathematical Economics, from the UOLIP, is a subject usually left for graduate study in the US. [/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]While, in[FONT=Arial, sans-serif] general, [/FONT]UK degrees may lack breadth in general education, but they compensate in depth of studies. [/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Unless, the provision of such General Education modules by universities is a concern, I don't see anything meaningful in comparing the number of modules. [/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Therefore, comparison of the overall degree programme in terms of relevant curriculum may be helpful. Afterall, Honours degrees in the UK, less Scotland and the new PPE from the LSE, are 3-year in duration as compared to the 4-year Bachelor degrees in the US and the local universities. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]As you may be already referring to comparing only the subject-related curriculum in degree programmes. I shall proceed to your next claim. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]"Even if I compare UOL modules' content word by word and it comes out to be true that one module is comparable to 2 modules locally."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]--> You have assumed that one course in the UOLIP is equivalent to two (local) "modules". [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Let's see if it is true. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]A "module" named, say, "Economics B" studied in first year of an LSE degree programme may seem to cover microeconomics and macroeconomics topics as could be found in two (local) "modules". In fact, it covers most parts of EC1101, EC2101, and some parts of EC2102 in the NUS. A closer examination would revealed that certain topics like the Hicksian and Slutsky substitution effects are taught in Economics B, albeit at an elementary level, which would only be taught in EC3101. Similar comparison is true even when we are comparing the UOLIP course, "Introduction to Economics" to the NUS courses, albeit "Introduction to Economics" might be slightly easier than the Economics B offered in the LSE. Two modules? I'm suspecting that it might worth more.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Hence, to view each modules from the LSE or the UOLIP as equivalent to two (local) "modules" may not be really accurate. Further, if this rule of "one course equals two local modules" does apply, then many UK universities would be no better than the UOLIP as most, if not all UK (less the Scottish universities) universities are complying to the 360 credits (or 180 ECTS) requirement in the UK. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]If the UK degree programmes are no better in terms of content, then I reckoned that you might be referring to the US or Australian degree programmes available locally. Australian universities does not offer Honours degrees through local private educational institutions. Unlike Australian degrees, which not all universities recognised that an Australian 3-year Bachelor degree is equivalent to a 3-year UK Honours degree or a 4-year US Bachelor degree, a 4-year US Bachelor is generally considered as equivalent to a 3-year UK Honours degree. So, let's compare some of the modules in the UB BA(Economics) with the courses in the BSc Economics from the UOLIP.[/FONT]


UB Undergraduate Credit Requirements:
Economics : Degrees & Policies : UB Undergraduate Catalog 2014-2015
It states that 85 credits are required for major and electives (it seems that UB undergraduate student in SIM GE require 88). Each module is around 3 to 4 credits.

UOLIP undergraduate requirements

Economics (BSc) | University of London International Programmes
Students from UOLIP require twelve courses.

If both programmes are equivalent in content, excluding General Education modules, then each UOLIP course should equate to 7.33 credits, or roughly two modules, in the UB.

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]UB modules: [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 115 Survey of Algebra and Trigonometry[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Lecture[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Credits: 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Semester(s): Fall, Spring[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Grading: Graded (A-F)[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]A pre-calculus course; covers topics from the NYS Regents Course III: order, absolute value, inequalities, exponents, radicals, polynomials, rational expressions, solving systems of linear equations, quadratic equations and inequalities, functions (rational, logarithmic, exponential, trigonometric), graphing, trigonometric identities. Emphasizes applications to problems. This fast-paced course reviews Course III and prepares students for further courses in mathematics. Students with three years of high school math but with weak algebra skills should take [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]ULC 147[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] before [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 115[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]. Students who have had only two years of high school mathematics may take [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 115[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif], or may prefer to take a two-semester sequence covering this material more thoroughly and at a more moderate pace: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]ULC 147[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] and [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]ULC 148[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif].[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 121 Survey of Calculus and Its Applications I[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Lecture[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Credits: 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Semester(s): Fall, Spring, Summer[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Pre-requisites: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 115[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] or Regents Course III Required for Registration[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Grading: Graded (A-F)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]For students in social, biological, and management sciences. Limits, continuity, differentiation of algebraic and exponential functions; applications; introduces integration. This course is a controlled enrollment (impacted) course. Students who have previously attempted the course and received a grade other than W may repeat the course in the summer or only in the fall or spring semester with a petition to the College of Arts and Sciences Deans' Office.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 122 Survey of Calculus and Its Applications II[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Lecture[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Credits: 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Semester(s): Fall, Spring, Summer[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Pre-requisites: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 121[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] or [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 131[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Grading: Graded (A-F)[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Continuation of [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 121[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]. Maximization of functions of several variables using both calculus and elementary linear programming techniques. Elementary integration, simple differential equations, matrix algebra.[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/~pgeorge3/122_summer2006/exam1.pdf[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/~pgeorge3/122_summer2006/exam2.pdf[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/~pgeorge3/122_summer2006/final.pdf[/FONT][/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 191 Introduction to Discrete Mathematics I
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Lecture[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Credits: 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Semester(s): (No information on typically offered semesters)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Pre-requisites: Working Knowledge of a Programming Lanugage Required for Registration[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Grading: Graded (A-F)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]First part of a two-semester sequence. Provides the mathematical foundations for the study of computer science. Also approved for mathematics majors in Concentration GS/ED. Topics include sets, relations, functions, mathematical induction, fundamental counting methods, difference equations, and sequences and series.[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 306 Introduction to Differential Equations[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Lecture[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Credits: 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Semester(s): Fall, Spring, Summer[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Pre-requisites: MTH 142[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Grading: Graded (A-F)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Analytic solutions, qualitative behavior of solutions to differential equations. First-order and higher-order ordinary differential equations, including nonlinear equations. Covers analytic, geometric, and numerical perspectives as well as an interplay between methods and model problems. Discusses necessary matrix theory and explores differential equation models of phenomena from various disciplines. Uses a mathematical software system designed to aid in the numerical and qualitative study of solutions, and in the geometric interpretation of solutions.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 309 Introductory Linear Algebra[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Lecture[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Credits: 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Semester(s): Fall, Spring, Summer[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Pre-requisites: MTH 142[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Grading: Graded (A-F)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Linear equations, matrices, determinants, vector spaces, linear mappings, inner products, eigenvalues, eigenvectors.[/FONT]


[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://copper.math.buffalo.edu/122/122_fdh_f13_with_syllabus.pdf[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://undergrad-catalog.buffalo.edu/archive/1314/academicprograms/mth_courses.shtml[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]UOLIP courses:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]EMFSS subject guides | University of London International Programmes[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Past exam papers and commentaries | University of London International Programmes[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Mathematics 1 and 2 from the UOLIP cover most parts in the first three modules, roughly [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]half of the module*corrected*MTH 309 Introductory Linear Algebra, and [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]some parts of MTH 306 Introduction to Differential Equations, and [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]MTH 191 Introduction to Discrete Mathematics I,[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] in the UB. [/FONT][/FONT]

It seems this example showed that, in terms of breadth, a UOLIP paired half-course are covering more than two modules in the UB. This suffices as a counterexample to your seemingly groundless claim on "rigour" based on the number of modules. even if we were to exclude the General Education modules here. Hence, "the most easiest way to determine the curriculum rigour, when a person is not resourceful enough to find the individual course content to compare word by word." is false.

We have not touch on the depth of learning. Surely,[FONT=Arial, sans-serif] knowing how to derive demand and supply requires different depth of knowledge from [/FONT]knowing demand and supply. T[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]here is also a problem in comparing similar topics covered when there exists different degree of difficulty of the exams set for a course or modules. Does one consider same topics examined at different degree of difficulty to share the same weigh? How, then, does one compare individual modules? [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]If answers to such questions are difficult, then one might have to resort to looking at relevant courses in the entire degree programme for comparison, like what many graduate admission comittees are doing for reference. [/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]It may be true that UB students could have learned a wider range of topics than students from the UOLIP, especially so when the General Education modules are included. However, when confronting certain topics in depth, a UB students may not be able to tackle it.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]My point is not to conclude which degree programme is better in absolute terms. The[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]point is, which is more suitable for ones objective(s), as one programme is focusing in depth, and the other programme is concentrating in breadth. I believed both programmes prepare students well with a good education.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Consider a student aiming to go for a strong MSc in Economics, which is usually highly quantitative in nature, then s/he might go along with a UOLIP BSc Economics which allow s/he to take courses in Real Analysis and Probability Distribution Theory. The question on hand, then, is no longer on a good general education. It is about relevance and availability. No such courses in the UB, locally.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]You might argue, back again, that NUS would then be a better choice because it provides more options. It may or may not be a better choice. The question now would then be whether NUS exists as an option to the decision-maker. It would also be futile to cite that UB offers general educational modules like local universities and also economics for this instance as it is not relevant to the decison-maker's [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]objective.[/FONT]

Hence, the statement, "[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]UOL is still not the best choice university to study in, when there are better renown university courses to choose from in a few of the private institutions, based on many other factors." is probably based on your own set of criteria which may not be generally applied. In the above example, UOLIP degrees in Economics has to be the "best" because they are the only options. [/FONT]

 

[SevenSeals]

Thanks guys for the advices here, I did some research these few days and decided that unisim PT may be the better option for me. Altho it's PT and classes are at night, I think taking it as a full time course and taking the max credit unit every semester. Just thinking what are some of the reasons sim ge would be chose over unisim in any scenario?

might as well try out for unisim full time? they give you the option of converting back to a PT course if you get a job offer halfway.

 

[intime]

might as well try out for unisim full time? they give you the option of converting back to a PT course if you get a job offer halfway.

I agree with SevenSeals.
MuggerX, since you missed the January intake.
The next intake will be in July 2015, might as well apply for UniSIM full time at the same time.
With a GPA of 2.5 may be difficult but no harm trying.
If you are determined to score, from now till the interview next year, find ways to boost up your portfolio and brush up on your business-related knowledge so you have things to talk about during 1 to 1 interview segment.

UniSIM Full-time admission process is very flexible. As long as you are shortlisted for an interview and you scored well enough in the interview to be place on the waiting list. You are most likely guarantee a Part-time programme slot as well if you are not selected for their Full-time programme.
In other words, they will invite you to join their Part-time programme without any further interviews.

Lastly, I am sure you are aware that only a handful of part-time programmes have honours option. So consider carefully.

 

[MuggerX]

I agree with SevenSeals.
MuggerX, since you missed the January intake.
The next intake will be in July 2015, might as well apply for UniSIM full time at the same time.
With a GPA of 2.5 may be difficult but no harm trying.
If you are determined to score, from now till the interview next year, find ways to boost up your portfolio and brush up on your business-related knowledge so you have things to talk about during 1 to 1 interview segment.

UniSIM Full-time admission process is very flexible. As long as you are shortlisted for an interview and you scored well enough in the interview to be place on the waiting list. You are most likely guarantee a Part-time programme slot as well if you are not selected for their Full-time programme.
In other words, they will invite you to join their Part-time programme without any further interviews.

Lastly, I am sure you are aware that only a handful of part-time programmes have honours option. So consider carefully.

Thanks for all the advices man it definitely helped me and I think it will be useful to others in the future.

Well I am in ns now in a rather slack stay out unit which I will have a lot of time to consider my future options. Regarding the UniSim PT/FT, the course I really want to take up is not in the FT course, which it is Bsc Psychology. However I would not limit my option to only that, I would try to apply for the July intake for FT courses too and give it a shot.( I am just worried I may not even be called up for interview but if I do I have quite a good amount of confidence in exceling the interview). Portfolios wise I don see how I can improve mine anymore in this period of time, (which I don really have any astonishing track record anyway). Bottomline I think Unisim would be the choice for me due to the govt subsidy I needed the most as I do not come from a family that can support my uni fees, ( I probably would have to take up bank loan like some others here )

Well I guess that's the life and path of a student in Singapore, ups &downs along the way, perhaps ultimately everyone is just doing a "business" with the industry for a meal to fill our stomach ?

 

[starbugs]

Thanks guys for the advices here, I did some research these few days and decided that unisim PT may be the better option for me. Altho it's PT and classes are at night, I think taking it as a full time course and taking the max credit unit every semester. Just thinking what are some of the reasons sim ge would be chose over unisim in any scenario?

Just note that UniSIM PT entry requires:

• Two years of full-time work experience or is currently employed on a full-time basis
• 21 years old and above

 

[MuggerX]

Just note that UniSIM PT entry requires:

• Two years of full-time work experience or is currently employed on a full-time basis
• 21 years old and above

Luckily two years of NS is counted as work experience

 

[Cracked]

Regarding the UniSim PT/FT, the course I really want to take up is not in the FT course, which it is Bsc Psychology. However I would not limit my option to only that, I would try to apply for the July intake for FT courses too and give it a shot.( I am just worried I may not even be called up for interview but if I do I have quite a good amount of confidence in exceling the interview).

Interview for Unisim's psychology programme? There is no admission interview for that, just go apply and wait for your admission result