lycheehello
Suspended
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 60,267
- Reaction score
- 3,898
Dear Colleagues,
It has only been less than a week since the Promoted Thread function was launched and we have seen two of such threads deleted.
The rationale given so far is that customers have already been briefed of the Terms of Service and thus should shoulder responsibility and not be given refunds.
However, I note that:
1. Terms of Service can be a subjective matter. HWZ will always have 100% understanding of the Terms of Service while consumers will not (due to ignorance or misunderstanding), creating a knowledge gap that is unfair for the consumer. Nobody in the right mind will spend $20 over dollars to have his thread deleted, and hence the assumption of his ignorance/misunderstanding. Do we really want to penalize a person over this?
2. In the case of a breach of TOS, HWZ absorbs all costs, without rendering a service to the consumer. This also does not sound fair.
Hence, I would like to propose (should a plain refund not be a feasible idea):
a. That the winning bidder's thread be manually screened by moderators before any transaction is made. Should the thread breach TOS, the runner-up bidder's thread be considered and so forth...
b. OR. The offending bidder be notified of his breach and allowed to elect an alternative thread be promoted instead. He may create a new thread for this purpose.
c. OR. Provide alternative service for the cash received. Deluxe membership, HWZ magazines, etc.
Administrators, for your consideration, please.
It has only been less than a week since the Promoted Thread function was launched and we have seen two of such threads deleted.
The rationale given so far is that customers have already been briefed of the Terms of Service and thus should shoulder responsibility and not be given refunds.
However, I note that:
1. Terms of Service can be a subjective matter. HWZ will always have 100% understanding of the Terms of Service while consumers will not (due to ignorance or misunderstanding), creating a knowledge gap that is unfair for the consumer. Nobody in the right mind will spend $20 over dollars to have his thread deleted, and hence the assumption of his ignorance/misunderstanding. Do we really want to penalize a person over this?
2. In the case of a breach of TOS, HWZ absorbs all costs, without rendering a service to the consumer. This also does not sound fair.
Hence, I would like to propose (should a plain refund not be a feasible idea):
a. That the winning bidder's thread be manually screened by moderators before any transaction is made. Should the thread breach TOS, the runner-up bidder's thread be considered and so forth...
b. OR. The offending bidder be notified of his breach and allowed to elect an alternative thread be promoted instead. He may create a new thread for this purpose.
c. OR. Provide alternative service for the cash received. Deluxe membership, HWZ magazines, etc.
Administrators, for your consideration, please.
Last edited: