You might also want to also take a look at this thread.. There will be no end saying which is the best, Insurance Agent, IFAs.. End of the day, it is the mindset of that person that counts.. No matter how specialized a person is, if the end in mind is not correct, he/she is still a salesperson afterall..
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/money-mind-210/advice-needed-plan-get-retirement-cum-protection-plan-4529891.html
There is also a reason why IFA are governed under different set of act to be differentiated with insurance agents..
"[Financial Advisers Act] will create of a new class of licensed financial advisers. These professionals will be able to provide investment advice on a wide array of financial products, and also sell unit trusts and their close substitutes, such as ILPs. In some cases, these financial advisers will not be connected to any product providers, such as fund managers or insurance companies, and will act independently of them. Such independent financial advisers will represent the interests of their clients, rather than the interests of specific product providers.”
- Speech by Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman, Monetary Authority of Singapore, Lee Hsien Loong for the Second Reading of the Financial Advisers Bill 2001 in Parliament on 5th October 2001
With this being said, I'm still sticking to my sayings in the first paragraph.. But people got to be clear why IFA exist in the first place even though insurance companies are already dominating the market... Search deeper and you could find more things said by DPM on his personal view on insurance agents.. Peace everyone! All of us are here to help..