reddevil0728
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
- Messages
- 66,289
- Reaction score
- 5,867
lets no conflate common sense with lack of clarity leading to misinterpretation.Of cos its not entirely true, only people without common sense can interpret it at the extremes.
You suggest "majority" want to do so. Can you please advise how you know it's the majority?Medicine is a skilled profession, good doctors can command a higher salary and majority of them want to do so.
I don't think it is the suggestion about planning based on exceptions. I don't think you engaged in the point aboutThere are always exceptions where exceptionally good doctors are in the public setting because they want to serve the greater good. But ppl should not be planning based on the exceptions.
If you are frequent user of healthcare, going for pte insurance makes sense. but if you aren't, then getting a class, and top up when required to use pte care might make more sense. see BBCW's post.
that might be true, might that doesn't mean one cannot optimise the cost.You should just plan on the rule of thumb, the more you pay the higher chance you will get better care.
again i don't think you engaged in points that have addressed this.And my statement is just simply pte insurance is not about the luxury of sleeping in pte wards, but it gets you access to the full range of pte doctors without worrying as much about the bills as you would have otherwise with a lower tier insurance. But of cos if you like to interpret it at the extreme ends and imply what I am saying is all lower tier insurance are bad, only pte doctors are good, pte insurance means everything is free and so on, then feel free to do so.
see BBCW's post.
