BBCWatcher
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 24,459
- Reaction score
- 5,524
As a quick, imperfect comparison, the U.S. system has a combined (employer plus employee) contribution rate of 15.3% on earned income from work. All but 2.9 percentage points of that is subject to an income cap. In contrast, Singapore’s combined contribution rate (employer plus employee) is 37%, all subject to a cap.
U.S. retirement benefits are generally higher than Singapore’s, and there are disability, survivors, and spousal benefits, too. There’s also a modest death benefit ($255 in 2019), but there is no bequest, except in the form of survivors and spousal benefits. And there’s no compulsory housing-related savings associated with U.S. Social Security.
But in Singapore everybody must “win,” including heirs in the form of residual bequests. So we pay for that, a lot. Yes, OK, this comparison is oversimplified, but those are the headlines. And I’m not complaining! CPF works rather well for me, actually. My point is that if you want a system with the world’s highest emphasis on bequests, it’s obviously possible, but you pay for it.
....And before anybody jumps in here with a stupid comment about “Asian culture,” Japan’s system doesn’t feature any bequests either. Singapore’s median and average household wealth is among the world’s highest, and younger generations are doing even better than their elders. And yet.... we’ve got 37% CPF contributions, partly so we can hoard for possible (not guaranteed) lump sum bequests. It really is globally weird, but that’s what we’ve got.
U.S. retirement benefits are generally higher than Singapore’s, and there are disability, survivors, and spousal benefits, too. There’s also a modest death benefit ($255 in 2019), but there is no bequest, except in the form of survivors and spousal benefits. And there’s no compulsory housing-related savings associated with U.S. Social Security.
But in Singapore everybody must “win,” including heirs in the form of residual bequests. So we pay for that, a lot. Yes, OK, this comparison is oversimplified, but those are the headlines. And I’m not complaining! CPF works rather well for me, actually. My point is that if you want a system with the world’s highest emphasis on bequests, it’s obviously possible, but you pay for it.
....And before anybody jumps in here with a stupid comment about “Asian culture,” Japan’s system doesn’t feature any bequests either. Singapore’s median and average household wealth is among the world’s highest, and younger generations are doing even better than their elders. And yet.... we’ve got 37% CPF contributions, partly so we can hoard for possible (not guaranteed) lump sum bequests. It really is globally weird, but that’s what we’ve got.
