[GE2015] "钱去了哪里?!"

smith2006

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
14,251
Reaction score
1,417
什么情况啊?????

IE-PE-1-30-April-2013.jpg
 

Kiwi8

Honorary Member
Deluxe Member
Joined
May 3, 2001
Messages
138,979
Reaction score
17,354
Hole cards:
PAP: AHPETC; WP: unknown

Pre-flop action:
PAP raises bets, WP calls

Flop action:
PAP bets, WP calls

Turn:
PAP bets, (WP says,"I endure you for very long liao.")
WP calls

River:
(PAP blinks...hesitates). PAP checks.
WP shoves ALL-IN

:D
U must be the one who came up with the following article rite? :D

http://redwiretimes.com/cow-beh-cow...game-ruthless-evasive-but-brutally-effective/
The WP’s Political Poker Game: Ruthless, Evasive, but Brutally Effective
Posted on Sep 6 2015 - 12:33am by Redwire Singapore
« PREVIOUS
|

redwire-singapore-low-thia-khiang-hougang-smc
COWBOYJOHNNY: Hougang had a surplus, AHPETC will have a surplus, and Punggol-East was in deficit when the PAP handed it over.

In just 4 days of rallies, the Workers’ Party gave the gamblers’ equivalent of “show-hand”, and it looks to have beaten the PAP at this game of town council poker.

The PAP got the game going when it dropped the bomb about AHPETC’s alleged fund mismanagement.

It went on the attack, and wave after wave followed, with the Ministry of National Development leading the charge.

When the accusations first started, the WP said “give us time to check”.

When MND minister Khaw Boon Wan suggested hara kiri, the WP sat quiet, choosing neither to take up or fall on their swords.

Minister after minister took up the cause to destroy the WP’s credibility – Shanmugam, Desmond Lee, Teo Chee Hean, and even Heng Swee Keat and Tharman.

Even when ministers like Mr Shanmugam made mistakes with their data, WP leaders chose dignified silence over extensive criticism.

Then, the WP was brought to court to force upon it independent accountants of its choice, and it responded with what can be seen as “have faith, all will be revealed in due course.”

The PAP appeared to have scored a victory against their most dreaded enemy in recent years.

Then, the public began to tire of the whole AHPETC saga, all was revealed.

AHPETC – the town council will have a surplus of S$1.7 million once the government releases the S$7 million worth of grants to the town council.

Punggol-East – when the PAP handed over the town council, it had a S$280,000 deficit before grants, not unlike the situation facing AHPETC.

Hougang – Had a surplus before it became a part of AHPETC, contrary to what was said by DPM Teo and our Law Minister when they suggested that the WP couldn’t run a town council well.

Added to this, the AGO’s revelation just before elections that the People’s Association had incurred S$3.6 million worth of lapses.

And, more lapses were found with government agencies, the one that possibly caused the most resentment being the Gardens by the Bay contracts, where some S$20 million of contracts were awarded without tender.

While the public grew to regard the government as a bully as the AHPETC war drew on, it’s now seen as a bully with no basis.

Perhaps that was the WP’s plan all along in this war of attrition, to lie in wait and land one brutally effective sucker – that last hidden poker card.

Ruthless and evasive, but with 6 days more to the polls, the WP might just have gotten the game wrapped up.
 

whatmeworry

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Messages
82,615
Reaction score
8,161
Is this what they say Sucker Punch attack?
Push me in a corner and i will scream.....just give me one more...one more chance?

While the public grew to regard the government as a bully as the AHPETC war drew on, it’s now seen as a bully with no basis.

Perhaps that was the WP’s plan all along in this war of attrition, to lie in wait and land one brutally effective sucker – that last hidden poker card.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top