Dude. U do know mutual funds are also run by fund managers rightThen why need fund managers ? Why not diversify the risks and put in the Mutual Funds ?
Inflation adjusted by not risk aligned.https://tradethatswing.com/average-historical-stock-market-returns-for-sp-500-5-year-up-to-150-year-averages/#:~:text=The average yearly return of the S&P 500 is 11.47,including dividends) is 7.39%.
The historical average yearly return of the S&P 500 is 10.16% over the last 20 years, as of the end of May 2024. This assumes dividends are reinvested.
Adjusted for inflation, the 20-year average stock market return (including dividends) is 7.41%.
Oh really ? Sheesh ... then I wonder why I paying so little for the Index funds ...Dude. U do know mutual funds are also run by fund managers right
That's why SA 4% is not sustainable.
Get ready for SA to be slashed in the near future.
Lots of angst lol.Oh really ? Sheesh ... then I wonder why I paying so little for the Index funds ...
And why I can see how much I have to pay for the management of the fund right in my face before buying...
And what they are holding etc etc...
If I still want to pay them for what they hold and their past performance ... it's my problem...
FTs……….Very lousy performance. Very sure that gic overpaid their staff. Very crusby jobs. Lots of FTs also
can someone verify what GPT is suggesting??chatgpt says use (1+0.039)^20-(1+0.046)^19 to estimate most recent return
means got 20% loss last year

Lol ... not angst ... it's called capitalism...Lots of angst lol.
1. Pay little doesn't mean no fund manager. Passive strategy regardless. Your point should be why don't we redirect investments to index funds and not why don't we redirect to mutual funds.
There's a story to be said about index returns and beating inflation, but I'm not the sexpert to explain.
2. You're not the direct customer. Your relationship to gic is like your laopeh managing ur trust fund.