But zotac won't be as durable as msi or gigabyte I suppose ? The build quality.
But zotac won't be as durable as msi or gigabyte I suppose ? The build quality.
Going by your logic, means Asus is the most reliable since it's the most chop carrot priced
But zotac won't be as durable as msi or gigabyte I suppose ? The build quality.
Asus is the most solid of all brands I bought so far but the OC capability just not there


bro, there u go againbro, there u go again
Asus is the most solid of all brands I bought so far but the OC capability just not there
Conversely most of the ASUS cards reviewed are considered to have the most overclocking headroom due to their great cooling.
from personal experience the silicon lottery is very big. Unless you buy the ROG series (Striker, Poseidon, Matrix) which are binned, the normal DC2 really depend on your luck. my DC2OC GTX 780 could only do 2.8k Valley @ 1094mhz max
it's voltage locked also
Cooling-wise hard to say. On air most solutions are comparable
Actually I think is more of a heng suay kind of thing ba. Not say cause is Asus won't spoil so easily as compared to sapphire or Msi. Unless you are talking about the fake sapphire cards
I agree with that. I mean build and heft. If u go hold asus card u will know what i mean. The screws they all factory machine tightened until its a ******* to open but its very stable no creaking
I agree with that. I mean build and heft. If u go hold asus card u will know what i mean. The screws they all factory machine tightened until its a ******* to open but its very stable no creaking
No la lols you tot cheaper is lousy quality? Is completely wrong. Hahaha the reason for it to be cheaper is because the design difference, not because of cheaper components
Hmm ok.because my friend has a Palit and it breaks down in 2 years. Other brand no problem at all
So if msi or giga use manual labour to tighten screws, mean not even worth buying at all ah? Even if it is tight enough for the cooler not to fall off?