Given a choice between asset rich and a life partner

[iceblendedchoc]

as long your hand has rice, all the chickens will follow you. Once you give them the rice, they will stop following you.

 

[Notbbfa]

Cons for choosing love over $ loh

True ,I married my wife for BTO

means to advance ur investment decisions, not because u love her?

 

[FORSTA]

both cannot take with you when die.

随缘就好

 

[Thoreldan]

Of course money

"Tree fall, monkeys scatter"

 

[Dinoboyboy]

Both are useless if you dont have the health and longevity to enjoy..

 

[1982-1994]

means to advance ur investment decisions, not because u love her?

I am trolling at times

 

[A Better Tomorrow]

Love does not fill a hungry stomach or help your immediate family to pay for their medical bill when you are on your own.

Dont believe in love; believe how people will choose when their interests are at stake.

 

[Song Bro]

1)Asset rich but no one to share with you
2)Poor but your partner is always by your side

Pros for
1)no worries about money
2)they are there for you no matter you are happy or sad

Cons for
1) can't take money with you when RIP
2) can't afford for luxury/ can't take your partner with you RIP

In b4 why not both

Not money but peace.

Pros:
1) Nope. Unless she give you a child
2) Some form of companionship or bed partner
3) "No worries about money" - TS
4) "They are there for you no matter you are happy or sad" - TS
5) So best is invest in oneself happiness. The experience is halfed, true, but u own it all.
6) No one can. So it is not a choice to deal with.
7) Can learn responsibility - Song Bro. But no family also need to be responsibility for oneself.
Traditional values assume self is not important.

Cons:
1) Have to hope he is yours. Even so, when grew up the child is likely to hate you.
At some point in time, she is likely to pour resentments
to the child saying how bad a dad you are.
2) Very likely lesser and lesser chance of intimacy as time goes.
3) Her money is her money; your money is family's money, what TS talking
4) You are there to listen to her sadness and make her happy, sure
5) "Cant take money with you when RIP" - TS
More often than not, she takes money when she is living and when she is leaving.
6) "Can't afford for luxury/ can't take your partner with you RIP" - TS

 

[iam7377]

1)Asset rich but no one to share with you
2)Poor but your partner is always by your side

Pros for
1)no worries about money
2)they are there for you no matter you are happy or sad

Cons for
1) can't take money with you when RIP
2) can't afford for luxury/ can't take your partner with you RIP

In b4 why not both

Asset Rich. You rich can find any partner. And there is no such thing as life partner...

 

[rrr2015]

Asset rich

AND

No one to share it with?

What’s the downside to it?

downside is everyday need to decide how much u want to spend

 

[rrr2015]

neither rich nor poor & few soul mates

 

[Medicated Oil]

Asset Rich.
Life Partner is just a myth.
You came alone and die alone.
You have to deal with loneliness even if you are married.

If you are lonely, get a dog or a cat.

 

[MoeLanYong]

The funny thing is those that chose money are the same ones that open threads here to lament they no love, no gf, find life meaningless etc

 

[fire]

小孩才做选择，两个都要

 

[Kuudere]

Asset Rich.
Life Partner is just a myth.
You came alone and die alone.
You have to deal with loneliness even if you are married.

If you are lonely, get a dog or a cat.

get dog or cat, then possibly also can attract life partner. But if can't attract, at least wouldn't be lonely.

 

[Medicated Oil]

get dog or cat, then possibly also can attract life partner. But if can't attract, at least wouldn't be lonely.

As I mentioned, you can be lonely even if you are married or attached.
So, deal with it with the HUGE wealth and lots of gf.

 

[Mr Totoro 38]

$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

[freshvibes]

Definitely the money.