These models decay. They usually give accurate answers at launch but then give increasingly wrong answers after answering more and more answers. Paid or free also same - it's like Windows becoming more unstable over time and the only solution is another fresh install.Not just grok even chatgpt recently like to argue with me and go against my command.
You click on Google ads?Google ads also jialat liao cos everyone using Gemini instead of looking at searches.
If enterprise AI and critical system AI are going to behave in the same way, I think we are doomed.These models decay. They usually give accurate answers at launch but then give increasingly wrong answers after answering more and more answers. Paid or free also same - it's like Windows becoming more unstable over time and the only solution is another fresh install.
That's what I initially tot.Google ads also jialat liao cos everyone using Gemini instead of looking at searches.
That’s why I refuse to log in to an account when I use GoogleThat's what I initially tot.
Turn out, my results from Google ads and organic search are still strong.
Google algorithm runs very deep in your entire browsing experience, not only on google.com![]()
Wow thanks for letting me know I'm not missing out on paid version.These models decay. They usually give accurate answers at launch but then give increasingly wrong answers after answering more and more answers. Paid or free also same - it's like Windows becoming more unstable over time and the only solution is another fresh install.
Conclusion: There are no pixel-level variances between these two sides; the screenshots depict the exact same EQ preset/configuration twice.I sent it screenshots of two EQ profiles for it to tell me the differences in the knob levels for each of the 10 frequencies, using the most accurate pixel to pixel comparison calculations. It says all ten knobs are in the exact same positions in both images. But it’s clear that the knobs for 50 Hz and 160 Hz are in different positions, as you can see so even from the thumbnails:
![]()
After I pointed out that the naked eye can see at least two frequencies are not in same positions, it says it ran a more refined, higher-precision analysis and still found all 10 knobs in identical positions in both images. Then try to gaslight me with why the naked eye might see differences!
![]()
![]()
IMHO.I sent it screenshots of two EQ profiles for it to tell me the differences in the knob levels for each of the 10 frequencies, using the most accurate pixel to pixel comparison calculations. It says all ten knobs are in the exact same positions in both images. But it’s clear that the knobs for 50 Hz and 160 Hz are in different positions, as you can see so even from the thumbnails:
![]()
After I pointed out that the naked eye can see at least two frequencies are not in same positions, it says it ran a more refined, higher-precision analysis and still found all 10 knobs in identical positions in both images. Then try to gaslight me with why the naked eye might see differences!
![]()
![]()