'Hands off my Facebook': Singaporean in rare defiance of government order to 'correct' her opinion

tshace

Master Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Messages
3,986
Reaction score
3,580
'Hands off my Facebook': Singaporean in rare defiance of government order to 'correct' her opinion

A Singaporean activist has refused to comply with a government order to publish a "correction" to her social media post criticising the authorities' handling of the execution of a death row inmate early this month".

The directive was issued to anti-death penalty activist Kokila Annamalai under the city-state's so-called Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma), a draconian law that gives the government sweeping powers to declare a particular online post false before ordering the author to make corrections.

"There are no false facts in the post," said a defiant Kokila in an article addressed to Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, who has over the years emerged as one of the staunchest defenders of Singapore's controversial drug laws that have seen a series of executions carried out under controversial procedures.

"The minister is deeply mistaken if he thinks that I will be a mouthpiece for his opinions about prisoners on death row and his attempts to defend the barbaric death penalty regime in Singapore," she added.

Kokila's refusal led to the government issuing a legal demand to Meta and X, instructing the platforms to publish a "correction notice" while launching an investigation against her.

"None of this will silence me, nor will it stop the anti-death penalty movement in Singapore, which has been growing from strength to strength. We grew up with bullies in power, we know how to fight them," said Kokila, who was charged in June this year along with two others for mobilising the public to deliver letters to the prime minister urging him to end ties with Israel to protest the genocide in Gaza.

The directive to Kokila was issued on Oct 5, a day after the execution of Azwan bin Bohari, along with several other directives to anti-death penalty group Transformative Justice Collective, instructing it to publish "corrections" to articles and posts on its website and social media pages.

On Oct 2, Kokila criticised authorities for the "emotional rollercoaster" that Azwan and his family had been subjected to when his execution date was "fixed, stayed, then fixed again" within a six-month period.

She had also questioned how the court had come to the conclusion that the drugs found on Azwan were intended for trafficking and not for personal consumption.

"In most other states, the prosecution has to prove trafficking, not presume it on the basis of the quantity seized. It is indeed possible that Azwan had half the drugs for his own consumption, but the problem is this: Singapore’s laws require him to somehow prove that this was the case. "The cost of failing to do so? His life," she wrote on Facebook.

She recalled how Azwan testified in court that he was tricked into making a false confession by the police after being promised he could see his girlfriend. Kokila said it was common in Singapore for accused persons to be interrogated without a lawyer.

"This is outrageous enough in a non-capital case, but when the stakes are as high as life or death, it is utterly unacceptable for an accused person to be interrogated without a lawyer to look out for their rights and ensure that they are treated fairly."

For her comments, Kokila was ordered to publish a "correction" to reflect the home ministry's denial that the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, as well as to retract her criticism of the burden of proving a drug trafficking charge.

"The false statements could erode public trust in the Singapore government and our criminal justice system," the ministry said in in issuing the order.

"We advise members of the public not to speculate and/or spread unverified rumours," the ministry said in the notice.
'He won't debate'

Kokila challenged Shanmugam to an open debate if he disagreed with her views on the death penalty.

"But he won’t do it. Instead, he aggressively asserts his views on the death penalty in mainstream media, in alternative media, in Parliament, on his social media platforms, in schools, at youth forums, at civil service events, in public addresses — while various authorities make sure death penalty abolitionists don’t have access to any of these platforms."

Kokila said the last place she would allow the minister was on her Facebook page.
"Well, I’m sorry, the minister can’t have his say on my Facebook page too. It is a sacred space to me, the space I learnt to find my voice," she said, describing Pofma as a tool of the government to inflict psychological violence on the public.
Kokila said that many before her had been forced to comply with Pofma's "correction" order as they could not afford to mount a legal challenge or to be slapped with the hefty fine of S$20,000 and/or 12 months imprisonment.

"Yes, I am afraid of fines I cannot afford, and prison time. But I am more afraid of what will happen if we don’t stand up for the truth, for our freedom, and for justice, when we are given the chance. I am afraid, over all else, that if I don’t do this, I will lose my moral compass and betray my integrity," she wrote.

https://www.malaysianow.com/news/20...ce-of-government-order-to-correct-her-opinion
 

tshace

Master Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Messages
3,986
Reaction score
3,580
"... Kokila's refusal led to the government issuing a legal demand to Meta and X, instructing the platforms to publish a "correction notice" while launching an investigation against her...."

Will Meta and X bow down to the correction notice? Shan said p00fma is far reaching. So it must be "very powerful", rite?

 

windwaver

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2000
Messages
33,183
Reaction score
2,344
'Hands off my Facebook': Singaporean in rare defiance of government order to 'correct' her opinion

A Singaporean activist has refused to comply with a government order to publish a "correction" to her social media post criticising the authorities' handling of the execution of a death row inmate early this month".

The directive was issued to anti-death penalty activist Kokila Annamalai under the city-state's so-called Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma), a draconian law that gives the government sweeping powers to declare a particular online post false before ordering the author to make corrections.

"There are no false facts in the post," said a defiant Kokila in an article addressed to Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, who has over the years emerged as one of the staunchest defenders of Singapore's controversial drug laws that have seen a series of executions carried out under controversial procedures.

"The minister is deeply mistaken if he thinks that I will be a mouthpiece for his opinions about prisoners on death row and his attempts to defend the barbaric death penalty regime in Singapore," she added.

Kokila's refusal led to the government issuing a legal demand to Meta and X, instructing the platforms to publish a "correction notice" while launching an investigation against her.

"None of this will silence me, nor will it stop the anti-death penalty movement in Singapore, which has been growing from strength to strength. We grew up with bullies in power, we know how to fight them," said Kokila, who was charged in June this year along with two others for mobilising the public to deliver letters to the prime minister urging him to end ties with Israel to protest the genocide in Gaza.

The directive to Kokila was issued on Oct 5, a day after the execution of Azwan bin Bohari, along with several other directives to anti-death penalty group Transformative Justice Collective, instructing it to publish "corrections" to articles and posts on its website and social media pages.

On Oct 2, Kokila criticised authorities for the "emotional rollercoaster" that Azwan and his family had been subjected to when his execution date was "fixed, stayed, then fixed again" within a six-month period.

She had also questioned how the court had come to the conclusion that the drugs found on Azwan were intended for trafficking and not for personal consumption.

"In most other states, the prosecution has to prove trafficking, not presume it on the basis of the quantity seized. It is indeed possible that Azwan had half the drugs for his own consumption, but the problem is this: Singapore’s laws require him to somehow prove that this was the case. "The cost of failing to do so? His life," she wrote on Facebook.

She recalled how Azwan testified in court that he was tricked into making a false confession by the police after being promised he could see his girlfriend. Kokila said it was common in Singapore for accused persons to be interrogated without a lawyer.

"This is outrageous enough in a non-capital case, but when the stakes are as high as life or death, it is utterly unacceptable for an accused person to be interrogated without a lawyer to look out for their rights and ensure that they are treated fairly."

For her comments, Kokila was ordered to publish a "correction" to reflect the home ministry's denial that the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, as well as to retract her criticism of the burden of proving a drug trafficking charge.

"The false statements could erode public trust in the Singapore government and our criminal justice system," the ministry said in in issuing the order.

"We advise members of the public not to speculate and/or spread unverified rumours," the ministry said in the notice.
'He won't debate'

Kokila challenged Shanmugam to an open debate if he disagreed with her views on the death penalty.

"But he won’t do it. Instead, he aggressively asserts his views on the death penalty in mainstream media, in alternative media, in Parliament, on his social media platforms, in schools, at youth forums, at civil service events, in public addresses — while various authorities make sure death penalty abolitionists don’t have access to any of these platforms."

Kokila said the last place she would allow the minister was on her Facebook page.
"Well, I’m sorry, the minister can’t have his say on my Facebook page too. It is a sacred space to me, the space I learnt to find my voice," she said, describing Pofma as a tool of the government to inflict psychological violence on the public.
Kokila said that many before her had been forced to comply with Pofma's "correction" order as they could not afford to mount a legal challenge or to be slapped with the hefty fine of S$20,000 and/or 12 months imprisonment.

"Yes, I am afraid of fines I cannot afford, and prison time. But I am more afraid of what will happen if we don’t stand up for the truth, for our freedom, and for justice, when we are given the chance. I am afraid, over all else, that if I don’t do this, I will lose my moral compass and betray my integrity," she wrote.

https://www.malaysianow.com/news/20...ce-of-government-order-to-correct-her-opinion
Maybe she should spend some time volunteering for the community and understand how issues arise before thinking she's right?
 

Sylar22

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
25,471
Reaction score
12,901
'Hands off my Facebook': Singaporean in rare defiance of government order to 'correct' her opinion

A Singaporean activist has refused to comply with a government order to publish a "correction" to her social media post criticising the authorities' handling of the execution of a death row inmate early this month".

The directive was issued to anti-death penalty activist Kokila Annamalai under the city-state's so-called Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma), a draconian law that gives the government sweeping powers to declare a particular online post false before ordering the author to make corrections.

"There are no false facts in the post," said a defiant Kokila in an article addressed to Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, who has over the years emerged as one of the staunchest defenders of Singapore's controversial drug laws that have seen a series of executions carried out under controversial procedures.

"The minister is deeply mistaken if he thinks that I will be a mouthpiece for his opinions about prisoners on death row and his attempts to defend the barbaric death penalty regime in Singapore," she added.

Kokila's refusal led to the government issuing a legal demand to Meta and X, instructing the platforms to publish a "correction notice" while launching an investigation against her.

"None of this will silence me, nor will it stop the anti-death penalty movement in Singapore, which has been growing from strength to strength. We grew up with bullies in power, we know how to fight them," said Kokila, who was charged in June this year along with two others for mobilising the public to deliver letters to the prime minister urging him to end ties with Israel to protest the genocide in Gaza.

The directive to Kokila was issued on Oct 5, a day after the execution of Azwan bin Bohari, along with several other directives to anti-death penalty group Transformative Justice Collective, instructing it to publish "corrections" to articles and posts on its website and social media pages.

On Oct 2, Kokila criticised authorities for the "emotional rollercoaster" that Azwan and his family had been subjected to when his execution date was "fixed, stayed, then fixed again" within a six-month period.

She had also questioned how the court had come to the conclusion that the drugs found on Azwan were intended for trafficking and not for personal consumption.

"In most other states, the prosecution has to prove trafficking, not presume it on the basis of the quantity seized. It is indeed possible that Azwan had half the drugs for his own consumption, but the problem is this: Singapore’s laws require him to somehow prove that this was the case. "The cost of failing to do so? His life," she wrote on Facebook.

She recalled how Azwan testified in court that he was tricked into making a false confession by the police after being promised he could see his girlfriend. Kokila said it was common in Singapore for accused persons to be interrogated without a lawyer.

"This is outrageous enough in a non-capital case, but when the stakes are as high as life or death, it is utterly unacceptable for an accused person to be interrogated without a lawyer to look out for their rights and ensure that they are treated fairly."

For her comments, Kokila was ordered to publish a "correction" to reflect the home ministry's denial that the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, as well as to retract her criticism of the burden of proving a drug trafficking charge.

"The false statements could erode public trust in the Singapore government and our criminal justice system," the ministry said in in issuing the order.

"We advise members of the public not to speculate and/or spread unverified rumours," the ministry said in the notice.
'He won't debate'

Kokila challenged Shanmugam to an open debate if he disagreed with her views on the death penalty.

"But he won’t do it. Instead, he aggressively asserts his views on the death penalty in mainstream media, in alternative media, in Parliament, on his social media platforms, in schools, at youth forums, at civil service events, in public addresses — while various authorities make sure death penalty abolitionists don’t have access to any of these platforms."

Kokila said the last place she would allow the minister was on her Facebook page.
"Well, I’m sorry, the minister can’t have his say on my Facebook page too. It is a sacred space to me, the space I learnt to find my voice," she said, describing Pofma as a tool of the government to inflict psychological violence on the public.
Kokila said that many before her had been forced to comply with Pofma's "correction" order as they could not afford to mount a legal challenge or to be slapped with the hefty fine of S$20,000 and/or 12 months imprisonment.

"Yes, I am afraid of fines I cannot afford, and prison time. But I am more afraid of what will happen if we don’t stand up for the truth, for our freedom, and for justice, when we are given the chance. I am afraid, over all else, that if I don’t do this, I will lose my moral compass and betray my integrity," she wrote.

https://www.malaysianow.com/news/20...ce-of-government-order-to-correct-her-opinion
She got the iron in her, especially her teeth
 

chaiscool

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2018
Messages
13,549
Reaction score
4,864
simple. it widely known Singapore has less tolerance on drugs. want to rest the system, get caught, bear the consequences. these activist really got nothing better to do.
Yalor, kill someone also no big deal but weed gets you hang in sg
 

tshace

Master Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Messages
3,986
Reaction score
3,580
Now p00fma is targeting OPINIONS?
Interesting!!!
Next target: Thoughts?

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 

ninja99

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
629
I didn’t really follow but the pofma is on the claim that death sentence prisoner wasn’t given enough resources to appeal or something like that ?
 

muji4832

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Messages
14,254
Reaction score
5,088
Ya man, so far I have not seen anyone managed to siam the destiny.

Last time Roy and HHH also super iron teeth, now also like ninja turtle hiding underground.

Even LHY also kena who da hell she think she is.

Probably run to other countries and seek asylum for political prosecution.
At this point she ticks all the boxes.
 

x1243x

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
3,577
she said "She recalled how Azwan testified in court that he was tricked into making a false confession by the police after being promised he could see his girlfriend. Kokila said it was common in Singapore for accused persons to be interrogated without a lawyer."

of course Shan will whack her lah..it's like RK doing a trust me bro..
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top