Harassment Help from this User

[Milodrink]

btw fyi - i also reported this thread liao

I have this user keep proudly instigating and announcing how happy he is to stir report for fun attention.

Dear Moderators please do the needful from this relentless harassment.

 

[Milodrink]

Mod please ban TS. Keep starting chinese propaganda here

U can no need to sign and entertain, u can choose to look pass it.


BUT u choose to cyberbully attack and threaten others just because you don't like the thread about Chinese. Like this:


So what I post things about China?

So no choice to avoid more threats from u now have to quote u to ask permission.

People from Australia, Canada, Philippines, Indonesia, USA, India, Pakistan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, etc. None complained, not a single condescending comment. ALL showing compassion.

Section 298 of the Penal Code: Uttering Words, etc. to Wound Religious or Racial Feelings​

A charge under section 298 of the Penal Code is a charge for uttering words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious or racial feelings of any person.

To be found guilty of this offence:

• You must have expressed a thought in some way, whether verbally, by making some noise, by making some gesture or by using some prop;
• In expressing that thought, your intention must have been to hurt the “religious or racial feelings” of a person; and
• That person must have actually seen or heard your expression of that thought.

https://singaporelegaladvice.com/law-articles/racial-enmity-sections-298-298a-penal-code/

https://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/me...-and-the-constitution-amendment-bill-opening/

 

[identity_1991]

Starting new thread again creating nuisance in this forum. My goodness.

 

[Ottoke]

Section 298 of the Penal Code: Uttering Words, etc. to Wound Religious or Racial Feelings​

A charge under section 298 of the Penal Code is a charge for uttering words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious or racial feelings of any person.

To be found guilty of this offence:

• You must have expressed a thought in some way, whether verbally, by making some noise, by making some gesture or by using some prop;
• In expressing that thought, your intention must have been to hurt the “religious or racial feelings” of a person; and
• That person must have actually seen or heard your expression of that thought.

https://singaporelegaladvice.com/law-articles/racial-enmity-sections-298-298a-penal-code/

https://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/me...-and-the-constitution-amendment-bill-opening/

No need to slap the penal code or whatever law here. This is not anyone's courtroom.

You may also stop squabbling in this thread because if you guys still insist, both of you will be banned first before we even close this case.