I think the draw for this plan is that you are covered for term insurance + savings, as from 3rd year onwards can cash out liao.
The conservative types would prefer to let the cashback value roll, whereas people like me would prefer to draw down every year after the 3rd because it forces me to save some cash, rather than dump all my disposable income into the stock market.
PruFlexiCash the term insurance part (death, TPD included ?) is not that high I guess ???
If you look at PruFlexiCash Protection Plus instead, the death benefit is 4 times the sum assured. This "term insurance" expires after 25 years. So here's the thing -- I put the $ into a term insurance covering me death + TPD + CI, isn't that a better choice ? I feel it is the same logic as why we should not mix insurance + investment together, in the case of an ILP.
Another thing is, for the guaranteed sum even if you never cashback at all, it is definitely lower than total premiums paid. Why is that so ? I think it is quite clear the premiums channeled to fund the significantly high "term insurance" portion.
In comparison with similar plans from other insurance companies, that is the difference. Their "term insurance" portion is not that high, and the guaranteed sum will be on-par or roughly the total premiums paid. This is then "closer to a savings plan".
Take for instance TM Nest Egg (GIO cashback) quotation. For this particular plan, even if you cashback for the next 23 years, take the total cashback amount and add into the guaranteed sum at maturity, the figure is in fact on-par with total premiums paid.
Things end up get complicated as many Prudential agents are selling this plan as "a pure savings plan" which is inappropriate.