BBCWatcher
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 24,537
- Reaction score
- 5,563
Two thumbs up for this argument. To amplify your argument, in 2016 Singapore will probably rank as the 39th largest economy in the world, just behind Denmark. Singapore's economy would be equivalent to about 1.6% of the U.S. economy alone. Invest only in Singapore and you're missing about 99% of the world. That's not reasonable portfolio diversification, not even close. Could you imagine investing only in Denmark? Arguably investing only in Denmark would be slightly more diversified than investing only in Singapore.as i said earlier, everything in your cpf and property is tied to singapore future. u wanna whack all your wealth on it, thats your personal choice. who knows maybe sg outperform every mkt in the future and u huat big with your concentrated risk. but ask those japanese who invest in their nikkei if they would do so if given the choice again.
We can certainly quibble about how much investing to do outside Singapore, but, at least for investors rising above the middle class, zero is the wrong answer.
That said, there are various global and non-Singapore regional investment vehicles available in Singapore. A lot of them are junk because, for example, they have high costs. I don't believe in buying junk to diversify. That's a big problem in my view, that (aside from traditional CPF) there aren't enough low cost options for investors of modest and moderate means. Singapore doesn't have anything like a Vanguard "Target" fund with no sales charges in or out and low expenses, and that's a shame.
Last edited: