He is not a Singaporean, he doesn't have CPF.
Right, so translated into Singaporean/PR terms, it’s basically like matching all CPF savings (employer and employee) dollar for dollar with additional savings. It’s a high savings rate at Revhappy’s income level, but it’s sometimes possible.
That’s not precisely the right comparison either, but that’s pretty close. Revhappy isn’t getting the tax breaks on CPF, he’s only effectively getting part of the employer contribution (it’s complicated), he’s got some higher medical expenses, and he gets no subsidized housing contribution (HDB BTO) to wealth accumulation, as examples. He’s also got more risk that the income flow will abruptly and unceremoniously end, and with 30 days to say goodbye, so that’s an even stronger reason to save more while it’s possible to save more. (When the harvest is abundant, fill up the grain stores — same basic principle, an ancient one.) On the other hand (and not a criticism of CPF since on balance it’s a great deal), Revhappy can be somewhat more aggressive, and in a low cost way, in his investing. CPF is bond-like, but Revhappy can more easily (and more affordably) tilt more into stocks if he wishes. And he’s also got a right of abode in a much lower cost retirement country, and it’s reasonable to forecast that that significant cost difference will remain for many years to come.