iBasso DX50 music player

S

SpOrTsTeR79

Master Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
4,101
Reaction score
0
DX50 review

Managed to get some time w d highly anticipated DX50, so here is my review:

Built:
Solid, good finishing, the case of the battery cover sits very nicely with no squeaky sound, tactile buttons is makes it easy to navigate. Brush metal is welcomed, as it is more resistant to scratches. Slightly smaller than iPod classic. Basic resolution for the screen.

Sound signature:
Sparkling but smooth highs
Tight and impactful bass
Very good separation
Wide soundstage
Good volume control

Compared to Fiio X3, the DX50 has:
Better presentation of highs n soundstage.
Better details retrieval.
Slightly laid back (similar to dx100)
X3 lack depth n width, separation is not as good as dx50.

Software:
Some of my .m4a tracks cannot be played.
The track is running, but there's no sound coming out. When I skip tracks, (those that are playable) the same thing happens. Need a restart to rectify it.
Long scanning time, w/o indication of progress.

Verdict:
The DX50 sounds very nice, coupled with tactile buttons, SD card options and removable batteries. Price performance ration is also very reasonable. Base on my impression of the DX100. There is some similarity between the 2.

Not that X3 is inferior, since it cost lesser, my expectations of X3 is lower as well. If the comparison is strictly base on my preferred sound signature, I'd give my vote to DX50.
 
S

SenGuards

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
517
Reaction score
0
SpOrTsTeR79 said:
DX50 review

Managed to get some time w d highly anticipated DX50, so here is my review:

Built:
Solid, good finishing, the case of the battery cover sits very nicely with no squeaky sound, tactile buttons is makes it easy to navigate. Brush metal is welcomed, as it is more resistant to scratches. Slightly smaller than iPod classic. Basic resolution for the screen.

Sound signature:
Sparkling but smooth highs
Tight and impactful bass
Very good separation
Wide soundstage
Good volume control

Compared to Fiio X3, the DX50 has:
Better presentation of highs n soundstage.
Better details retrieval.
Slightly laid back (similar to dx100)
X3 lack depth n width, separation is not as good as dx50.

Software:
Some of my .m4a tracks cannot be played.
The track is running, but there's no sound coming out. When I skip tracks, (those that are playable) the same thing happens. Need a restart to rectify it.
Long scanning time, w/o indication of progress.

Verdict:
The DX50 sounds very nice, coupled with tactile buttons, SD card options and removable batteries. Price performance ration is also very reasonable. Base on my impression of the DX100. There is some similarity between the 2.

Not that X3 is inferior, since it cost lesser, my expectations of X3 is lower as well. If the comparison is strictly base on my preferred sound signature, I'd give my vote to DX50.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how much of the sound signature is attributed to the IEM/headphone in use. Still, a brief yet informative review, thanks!

Looking forward to future firmware upgrades to rectify the issues.

GPGT? :s13:

ADDED: Which firmware of the DX100 would you say the DX50 sounds like?
 
Last edited:
J

Jiaxuan

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
0
SpOrTsTeR79 said:
DX50 review

Managed to get some time w d highly anticipated DX50, so here is my review:

Built:
Solid, good finishing, the case of the battery cover sits very nicely with no squeaky sound, tactile buttons is makes it easy to navigate. Brush metal is welcomed, as it is more resistant to scratches. Slightly smaller than iPod classic. Basic resolution for the screen.

Sound signature:
Sparkling but smooth highs
Tight and impactful bass
Very good separation
Wide soundstage
Good volume control

Compared to Fiio X3, the DX50 has:
Better presentation of highs n soundstage.
Better details retrieval.
Slightly laid back (similar to dx100)
X3 lack depth n width, separation is not as good as dx50.

Software:
Some of my .m4a tracks cannot be played.
The track is running, but there's no sound coming out. When I skip tracks, (those that are playable) the same thing happens. Need a restart to rectify it.
Long scanning time, w/o indication of progress.

Verdict:
The DX50 sounds very nice, coupled with tactile buttons, SD card options and removable batteries. Price performance ration is also very reasonable. Base on my impression of the DX100. There is some similarity between the 2.

Not that X3 is inferior, since it cost lesser, my expectations of X3 is lower as well. If the comparison is strictly base on my preferred sound signature, I'd give my vote to DX50.
Click to expand...
:p lookin' good . By the way did you tried the OTG function ?
 
F

fengwei

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2002
Messages
333
Reaction score
0
Sounds impressive. X3 already has pretty good sound stage, and the details are pretty good too.

Good volume control? What do you mean by this? Just curious. X3's volume control is pretty annoying though, have to go back to the play screen to adjust. Should have a dedicated button for this.
 
Random_Number

Random_Number

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Nice... I didnt really like the x3. Hows the UI btw, hows the sound compared to AK100, I hope I dunt sound annoying, I really want to like this player...
 
Last edited:
James Tang

James Tang

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
9,694
Reaction score
335
Nice review. Brief and sweet.

Does DX50 have a lock button so the center buttons are not accidentally pressed?
 
Rubick

Rubick

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
32,705
Reaction score
1,260
I am just wondering if the dx50 amp section is as power as x3 to be able to drive power hungry gears
 
doki81

doki81

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
12,180
Reaction score
932
damn..those oversea country using fedex already got their parcel :( our fardar package seem like stuck at custom and havent release...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top