What kind of ignorant, stupid logic is this? Got regulator means no bad things can happen? Very complacent attitude. You think Thailand doesn't have their own BCA regulator meh?We have bca.
Why is every1 so ignorant here ?
What kind of ignorant, stupid logic is this? Got regulator means no bad things can happen? Very complacent attitude. You think Thailand doesn't have their own BCA regulator meh?We have bca.
Why is every1 so ignorant here ?
jialat, we got many major infra under chinese developer. shall we have any concern abt this too??
So out of the other hundreds and thousands and tens of thousands of buildings in BKK and Myanmar, no china developer?![]()
The china railway is joint venture with thai largest construction company. Taiwan and western media only focused on the china railway, as if the thai contractor did not exist.Exactly, anti Chinese people having a field day after digging out that the contractor is a Chinese.
So many buildings in bangkok. How many built by Chinese contractor? I'm sure there are many others. Only 1 building which is not even completed yet fell after a big quake of 7.3. if anything, I think that's impressive.
I remember this case . They quietly ship back china to repair then in the end scrap whole lot.Remember our MRT carriage case - Metal fatigue? It was supposedly supervised by a Japanese company in china .
So anything with construction, building of vessels and even EV .. needs to be very careful
Exactly, anti Chinese people having a field day after digging out that the contractor is a Chinese.
So many buildings in bangkok. How many built by Chinese contractor? I'm sure there are many others. Only 1 building which is not even completed yet fell after a big quake of 7.3. if anything, I think that's impressive.
Not saying Chinese developer are all unsafe but to keep them safe, 150% vigilant checking on what they do. Otherwise, consequences will be very serious.
The person who posted this is Desmond Shum, a very successful and rich property developer. He has experience on the ground working with Chinese property developers.
“Trust but verify”? Not in China. Try: Never trust, always verify. So here’s what happened: During the recent Myanmar earthquake, a 33-story skyscraper in Bangkok suddenly decided to sit down (video attached) — permanently. This wasn’t some random building; it was the future home of Thailand’s Office of the Auditor General. Yes, the office in charge of checking that public money isn’t going up in smoke — or in this case, going down in rubble. It was the only high-rise in the city that collapsed, and Thai authorities are now scrambling to investigate what went wrong — construction quality, materials, earthquake resilience, the whole checklist. Now, allow me to offer a theory. As a former developer in China, I’ve worked with many Chinese builders— including China Railway Sixth, a close sibling of the company behind the Bangkok disaster, China Railway Tenth. I’ve seen this movie before, many times. And if there’s one rule that seasoned Chinese developers live by, it’s this: Every builder is guilty and there’s no exception. The only question is how to minimize the damage. In China, we owners don’t “collaborate” with builders — we shadow them like paranoid detectives. We have full in-house teams mirroring every function: site management, costing, engineering, architecture, etc…. Why? Because the minute you turn your back, someone’s bribing your staff, cutting corners, or quietly replacing steel with tofu. It’s not cynicism — it’s standard procedure. Trust isn’t just scarce — it’s a liability. Now contrast that with what happens in law-abiding societies. There, owners believe in contracts. They trust their builders. There’s good faith, accountability, and even — bless them — handshakes. So60 when a foreign owner from one of these trusting lands hires a Chinese builder without the paranoia goggles on? Well, this time the result wasn’t just a few cost overruns or dodgy plumbing. The whole damn building collapsed. And that, my friends, is what happens when you drop guanxi into a rule-of-law system — it short-circuits on contact, or in this case, collapses on site.
The china railway is joint venture with thai largest construction company. Taiwan and western media only focused on the china railway, as if the thai contractor did not exist.
Not everyone will get it. Like the PIE viaduct collapse, only the weakest link will be sentenced. Those with connections and the site staff of the concern authority botache.Dont anyhow stir. Drawing got approval. Work got inspection. If still collapse, everyone involved will get it.
you think thailand BCA have the same standard as SG?You think Thailand don’t have authority like BCA? BCA can’t possibly check everything, it’s simply unattainable.
Not saying Chinese developer are all unsafe but to keep them safe, 150% vigilant checking on what they do. Otherwise, consequences will be very serious.
The person who posted this is Desmond Shum, a very successful and rich property developer. He has experience on the ground working with Chinese property developers.
“Trust but verify”? Not in China. Try: Never trust, always verify. So here’s what happened: During the recent Myanmar earthquake, a 33-story skyscraper in Bangkok suddenly decided to sit down (video attached) — permanently. This wasn’t some random building; it was the future home of Thailand’s Office of the Auditor General. Yes, the office in charge of checking that public money isn’t going up in smoke — or in this case, going down in rubble. It was the only high-rise in the city that collapsed, and Thai authorities are now scrambling to investigate what went wrong — construction quality, materials, earthquake resilience, the whole checklist. Now, allow me to offer a theory. As a former developer in China, I’ve worked with many Chinese builders— including China Railway Sixth, a close sibling of the company behind the Bangkok disaster, China Railway Tenth. I’ve seen this movie before, many times. And if there’s one rule that seasoned Chinese developers live by, it’s this: Every builder is guilty and there’s no exception. The only question is how to minimize the damage. In China, we owners don’t “collaborate” with builders — we shadow them like paranoid detectives. We have full in-house teams mirroring every function: site management, costing, engineering, architecture, etc…. Why? Because the minute you turn your back, someone’s bribing your staff, cutting corners, or quietly replacing steel with tofu. It’s not cynicism — it’s standard procedure. Trust isn’t just scarce — it’s a liability. Now contrast that with what happens in law-abiding societies. There, owners believe in contracts. They trust their builders. There’s good faith, accountability, and even — bless them — handshakes. So when a foreign owner from one of these trusting lands hires a Chinese builder without the paranoia goggles on? Well, this time the result wasn’t just a few cost overruns or dodgy plumbing. The whole damn building collapsed. And that, my friends, is what happens when you drop guanxi into a rule-of-law system — it short-circuits on contact, or in this case, collapses on site.
the only selling point for older estates is their build structure.....
imagine all oppy voted out .. who will ask the hard questions in parliament?will someone ask in parliament?