Hmm. ILP is there for a reason. In fact it is regulated, if not it wont even exist. I think many different ppl have different opinions. But comparing between term, ilp or even wholelife is like comparing apple to orange. Like i said in my previous post, its for ppl who wanna see some cash with e benefit of protection and without lapsing it. Hence i still believe it has its use. Thats where it is e duty of agents to provide professional advice pertaining to e potential risk and how to "fix" e higher costs at old age.
If u have your ways to increase ur wealth via ur own investment methods, obviously we cant deny that ilp would be pretty not "usable" for chiu where u can jus hamtum term plans for protection. But not all are so savvy. Correct ma?
They may be there for a reason, but that reason is not very clear cut now given the market condition over the past decade. When I bought ILPs (2 of them using CPF), I was afraid to do my own investment and rely on such product at the same time, I get coverage. At that time, I didn't know how to do it and I see ILP as one such way of investing and do not mind the coverage becayse it was the extra, it was part of the investment plan. Although it isn't anything I would be proud of, but agent say at least cover in case of anything.
however, over the years as I begin to see my investment getting more RED.. I begin to wonder and there were things that were not told to me too. Slowly as I started to wake up and learn my lessson, I figured that there was no need for the insurance part because I have to pay for it along with other deduction which was not told to me, and never my initial intention. Breakeven? Those funds which I invested till today have yet to reach its peak (guess that's when I entered) and its been some 14 yrs now,I don't even need to look at the chart to tell me that if I hold on to it, it is still in the red. Sold it away on 7-8yrs after holding, lost 16K. LOST 40%. Given that kind of figure, how to recover?
However, after I withdraw my policies, I re-invest those $$ and making even more. I was not interested in coverage when I bought, just that I thought those are so-call experts who watch over my investment and do the job for me to make more $$$ for retirement..... didn't expect.... it to turn out that way. Just put it that way, depending on when you enter the market, otherwise, it you end up like myself, still loosing. Even if I don't use those cancelled ILP funds for re-investment, I will still be earning CPF interest. I still win.
CPF statistic over the years, majority who invest CPF $$ end up looser. More are making LOST than profit. The last report, can't recall but was few years back, most were loser but I was one of the minority that make from CPF investment. It also commented over the years, it would have been better for many not investing and but earn CPF interest pver certain period of time. quite some years as pointed out. Perhaps, ILP may not be relevant for those who wants to invest but not for coverage. For someone who does not own any coverage, that may be good, but for what purpose?
I had actually asked my agent before I bought because the coverage does not look attractive at all to me but was told it was part of it. that's why no choice, end up buying.. but found out the hard how the policy unfold.... = LOST $$$