infraction for posting candid photos

  • Need someone to talk to?
    Feeling down, anxious and need help? Mental Health Helpline: 6389-2222 (24 hours) More info
Status
Not open for further replies.

li9ht5peed

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2001
Messages
21,186
Reaction score
14,556
I took shots of people in public and got 6 points. There was no vulgarity involved. Why is this considered Doxxing / Harassment / Intrusion of Privacy ? There are so many lewd IG posts that do not get reported. What is the reasoning? Don't press photographers do the same thing? Where is the doxxing or harrassment or intrusion of privacy? Is it wrong to take pictures of strangers in public from far away? I was not even standing in front of them.
 

Orionz

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
59,595
Reaction score
22,711
Can mod reveal how these photos look like?

I seriously and sincerely appeal to admin and mods to further define, concretise and exemplify concepts of "lewd", "inappropriate" and "intrusion of privacy", etc. to help educate and inform users.

You guys have upped the stakes of the warning catalogue, so would you guys also please do the part of helping users understand where the red lines are? This is certainly not too much to ask as the admin admitted himself that the red line has evolved over time as the forum itself evolved.

From what i see, many borderline cases are really up to each and every mod, what is their impression and opinion of you as a user; in other words, arbitrary.
 
Last edited:

li9ht5peed

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2001
Messages
21,186
Reaction score
14,556
I have not erased the photos. The original links still work. Will the mods please examine and ask themselves what is the exact reason for the ban ? These are photos of women in public. There was neither nudity nor vulgar words used.
 

Orionz

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
59,595
Reaction score
22,711
@li9ht5peed

Taken from: https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/threads/some-important-notes.5271881/

3) Posting photos of others or ladies.

We get it. You guys enjoy sharing nice photos of others.
Nothing wrong with that – this has been ongoing for a very long time and we don't disallow it.

The exception is when you go overboard with lewd comments, be prepared to get infracted. What happened to the days when people just +1 because they liked a photo or pass decent compliments? Often the comments are really demeaning. If you can’t abide by the said rules above, throwing a fuss about it only makes it worse for you as you’re in the wrong to begin with. Yes, we probably haven’t infracted everyone else for similar offences, but neither are we screening every post in the forum. That means you’re already given a hall pass despite the forum rules. If you’re warned/infracted, just take note and move along.

Apart from commenting, if you’re aim of posting someone’s photo is to ridicule or cause harm to them, then we’ve all rights to remove the post or the discussion, again that’s in accordance to the rules. It’s also common sense, no? Yes, the photo (and related info) may be publicly available, but your intention of starting a particular topic with regards to that content is the key issue. Let’s take an example of a knife – it’s easily accessible to anyone and you typically use it to cut meats or other equivalent food. It’s harmless, until you intend to use it to stab someone. See the difference?

Does that mean you can automatically post any publicly available photo? Not really.

i) Someone might write in to object the use of their photo in the discussion because they aren’t comfortable with the association of the discussion or just any public exposure. You might say it’s on the internet, but the user may not have secured his/her social profiles and related image banks, for which we do advise them at the time of complaint to keep such publicly accessible content private. This is related to the intention and use of the image by the threadstarter.

ii) If you post riske, naked, close-to-naked, provocative or pornographic related images, they will be removed and you will be infracted. There’s a limit to what’s tolerable and decent. This forum board is meant for all walks of life and age and we would appreciate if can respect this. If you require adult entertainment, there are other boards to use.
 

li9ht5peed

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2001
Messages
21,186
Reaction score
14,556
i did not insult her looks, there was no ridicule either. if others insulted or ridiculed her, pls infract them, not me.

and if she asked for her pic to be removed, as in intrusion of privacy, then what about those who post videos of accidents publicly? furthermore, there are many non-IG and non-tiktok photos being circulated. Isn't that intrusion of privacy as well? where is the consistency?
 

Ottoke

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 12, 2015
Messages
147,986
Reaction score
5,299
Your comments are quite clear cut inappropriate

Thread title is also inappropriate:

【有图有说】巨乳肥妹 big cup street candid​


You also stated you took pictures of her in the public. then create a thread with the intention of shaming her looks.

If that isn't your intention, then I don't know what else you are trying to achieve. Please don't tell me you are trying to get the folks to comment on her good looks, because it doesn't look like one from the replies that we have seen.

1664102831316.png

O
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top