Inhalers for asthma patients produce significant amounts of greenhouse gases, say S’pore scientists

bigrooster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
23,337
Reaction score
35,265
The "experts" strike again!

Since we are on this topic, no "expert" mentions having increased population density and > 10 million population exacerbate the production of greenhouse gas in this little red dot.
 

ShinnAsuka

Master Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
2,618
So why these scientist don't want to find a way to store natural CO2 leh?


Edit: oh yes, can the scientist not work in air-conditioned room or labs then? Emit more greenhouse gases.
 

Prime 13

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
27,347
Reaction score
11,204
Since the scientist want to link asthma with global warming, i will nao redirect attention in another undesirable direction.

Concrete: the most destructive material on Earth

Remember thish ebrytiem chiu see Sg clear forest to build HDB.
Remember thish ebrytiem chiu see build more and more mrt lines.
Remember thish when chiu see lawrence wrong say "We are never done building Sg"
 

Apparatus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
53,532
Reaction score
11,251
Ok noted what the scientists said

So any alternatives suggested? Like take some kind of asthmatic sweets, patch etc

If no alternative suggestions then my mother also know how to say ah

:D
 
Last edited:

Apparatus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
53,532
Reaction score
11,251
Since the scientist want to link asthma with global warming, i will nao redirect attention in another undesirable direction.

Concrete: the most destructive material on Earth

Remember thish ebrytiem chiu see Sg clear forest to build HDB.
Remember thish ebrytiem chiu see build more and more mrt lines.
Remember thish when chiu see lawrence wrong say "We are never done building Sg"

Actually hor build basha to sleep the best. Green and cheap. Good for the environment and no need to have aircon some more

:D
 

Not.banned.yet

Master Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
1,944
Wah. Sian. Serious note. So I’m the biggest HFC contributor? Asthma all my life. Using inhaler since 7 yo

my trigger, when I get sore throat, flu symptoms.

so I should avoid the triggers? Mai Jiak snack, durian, and the heaty herbal soups. Life jin sad sia
 

RedOrion

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
13,330
Reaction score
7,128
Same scientists from HSA??

The same ones who judged the lady driver had poor driving reaction time to avoid causing harm to the cyclist who appeared suddenly from the front of a mini bus, into her lane....the same experts?


Edit:
Oh wait, these jokers from SHP....but not linked to HSA? :s13:
 

Prime 13

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
27,347
Reaction score
11,204
They needs to stack the CO2e emissions over one year and compare to 1 single long vehicle trip to make it sound jialat.
Thish ish lesson in crafting narrative to lumbers seem more jialat.

Well done.
I applaud.
 

ninjaghost

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
9,269
Reaction score
3,697
what kind of conclusion XD then develop non-produce greenhouse gas inhaler or make asthma extinct lah
finger pointed to asthma patient, really this kind scientist or researcher really JLB one because cant produce result can only draw target and shoot the arrow.
 

DragonFire

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,594
Reaction score
9,860
How about the carbon footprint of F1 night race?

Knn these scientists!
Irrelevant. CO2 and hydrofluorocarbon pollution are two very different things. HFC damages the ozone layer and is extremely persistent in the upper atmosphere.
 

DragonFire

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,594
Reaction score
9,860
That is about half kg of co2 per day. Impossible!

Someone made serious mistakes in the study
CO2 equivalent. They using CO2 like the USD as a baseline measure of global warming potential. Each unit mass of HFC has an order of magnitude more GW potential than plain old CO2.
 
Last edited:

Spike

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Messages
33,413
Reaction score
35,855

Inhalers for asthma patients produce significant amounts of greenhouse gases, say S’pore scientists​


https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...unts-of-greenhouse-gases-say-spore-scientists

SINGAPORE - People living with asthma are most vulnerable when taking a breath of air, yet their use of widely prescribed inhalers to help them breathe better contributes to the worsening of air quality.

Doctors say asthma patients should be managing their conditions better instead of turning to the inhalers frequently for treatment, to prevent more damage to the environment.

Scientists from SingHealth Polyclinics (SHP) have found that these inhalers generate a significant amount of greenhouse gases.

“These are the L-shaped metered-dose inhalers that release small puffs to help ease breathing for patients with asthma. But they emit high levels of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) propellants. The puffs add up,” said Clinical Associate Professor Tan Ngiap Chuan, director of research at SingHealth Polyclinics.

“What this means is that when you use (the inhalers) and when the chemicals are released, they trap the heat within the environment, causing the temperature to rise.”

HFC propellant is a type of aerosol propellant that uses a synthetic gas that contains hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon in products like hairsprays, deodorants and some inhalers.

Prof Tan and his team conducted two studies to understand the environmental impact of the metered-dose inhalers and assess the effect of the newer therapies in terms of asthma control and environment footprint.

On average, each patient using metered-dose inhalers with propellants in 2023 produced 140kg of CO2 emissions (CO2e) over a year, their studies found.

Based on the studies, The Straits Times calculated that inhalers used by one patient over a year emitted as much greenhouse gas as the average petrol-powered car that has travelled 97km, or from the eastern end of Singapore to the western end and back.

There is another kind of inhaler, a dry powder inhaler, for the treatment of asthma that produces less emissions. In 2023, the average individual patient using dry powder inhalers produced 121kg of CO2e, according to the SHP studies.

A dry powder inhaler depends on the user’s “strong, deep inhalation” to suck the medicine into the airways, where it is then broken down for absorption, said Prof Tan.

“This has a significantly smaller carbon footprint and this lowering of environmental impact is a key reason why we recommend better control of the condition and switching (to this kind of inhaler),” he added.

Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition affecting millions worldwide. In Singapore, more than one in 10 people experience asthma at some point in his or her life, and one in 25 adults aged 18 to 69 currently lives with the condition.

“Singapore faces high rates of acute asthma care, with a hospitalisation rate that is three times higher that of the United States,” said Prof Tan, who is also a senior consultant and family physician at SHP.

“The inhaled treatment is the best because it delivers the medication directly into the airway and the dose is tiny. These patients need to understand the use of such medication is treatment, and not when they get into trouble when they do not take care of themselves.

“Patients using the reliever inhaler for frequent asthma attacks are the ones who cause more damage to the environment,” he added, referring to the studies’ findings.

Besides inhalers, other asthma treatments include oral medications like oral corticosteroids for flare-ups and injections for severe asthma.

Also, patients can better manage their condition by paying attention to triggers of their allergies.

Prof Tan and his team looked at the difference between asthma patients whose condition was well controlled and those whose asthma was often triggered and whether turning to the inhaler as a solution would generate more carbon footprint.

The researchers analysed data from more than 23,000 adult patients with asthma who were receiving treatment from the nine polyclinics under the SingHealth cluster between 2015 and 2023.

They also looked at two different groups of patients – those using metered-dose inhalers and those using dry powder inhalers.

Their studies were published in July and August 2025 in Primary Care Respiratory Medicine under peer-reviewed journal Nature, which is the only scientific journal for the management of respiratory diseases in primary care.

The findings were similar to an earlier study by Dr Amanda Zain, a paediatrician in the Department of Paediatrics of Khoo Teck Puat – National University Children’s Medical Institute at National University Hospital.

Her study, published in August 2024 in scientific publication Wiley, found that the propellants in asthma inhalers have a significantly disproportionate warming effect.

Inhaler use contributes 0.5 per cent of NUH’s total greenhouse emissions, Dr Zain told ST.

“Inhalers can be life-saving medication in times of asthma attacks. But the use of at least three ventolin canisters a year constitutes ventolin overuse, so this is a medical issue much larger than the environmental impact,” she said.

“Rather than to have patients worry about the environmental impact while dealing with their own acute physical well-being during an asthma attack, we should be asking, how (as healthcare professionals) we can better help control our patients’ asthma so that they have fewer asthma attacks.

“This is better for patients and (incurs) less inhaler-related unnecessary carbon emissions,” Dr Zain said.
What is the purpose of this stupid study? How much public funds spent on this dumb research that doesn't help anyone?
 

DragonFire

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,594
Reaction score
9,860
Should ask saf to ban inhalers and remove the wristband for asthmatics
No the correct thing to do is develop reusable, ultraportable mechanical/ultrasonic nebulizers that have the footprint of a vape device.

The technology is available, as is the power density. I can DIY one in my makerspace with COTS parts.

They will be a lot more efficient to package and ship than contemporary devices that require pressure vessels.
 

DragonFire

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,594
Reaction score
9,860
What is the purpose of this stupid study? How much public funds spent on this dumb research that doesn't help anyone?
To drive change? It is a little myopic on your part to call it stupid. Ultrasonic delivery of medication is not reinventing the wheel. Refactoring a bulky hospital use machine into something that is ultraportable hold benefits for both manufacturers and consumers. The downside in the past was power density of battery system. That is no longer an issue today with lithium batteries.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top