Intel i5-7600K Kaby Lake Engineering Sample Benchmarked

ZrE0_Cha0s

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
16,703
Reaction score
26
Intel i5-7600K Kaby Lake Engineering Sample Benchmarked

Intel-Kaby-Lake-1.jpeg


With some mobile Kaby Lake CPUs running around, it was only a matter of time before we got some desktop numbers as well. Earlier, some overclocking numbers pop up for the i7 7700K and i5 7500K. Today, we’re getting treated to some benchmarks for the i5 7500K with a whole range of full-scale tests. Keep in mind that that this chip is only an engineering sample so it might not be representative of the final product.

From the leaked CPU-Z, the i5 7500K features 4 Kaby Lake cores clocked at 3.8 GHz base and 4.2 GHz boost. The chip uses Intel’s latest 14nm+ process with 6MB of L3 cache and 91W TDP. In terms of stock performance versus the i5 6600K, the Kaby Lake chip managed to pull ahead by about 6% overall in single threaded tasks and 9% in multi-threaded workloads. For gaming, the boost was a much smaller 4%.

Intel-Core-i5-7600K-vs-Core-i5-6600K_Benchmarks-415x840.png


Even with these numbers, Kaby Lake is the disappointment we’ve been waiting for. Compared to Skylake, there are no architecture tweaks, just a refined process which improves efficiency. All of the performance gains likely come from the higher stock clocks, 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz. The 7500K is clocked about 7% faster which explains the 6% gains in single-threaded performance. Once we remove the clock speed advantage, performance is very likely the same. The one area of improvement though is the multithreaded workload where the 7500K may be able to better hold its boost clocks due to the refined process.

Even though Kaby Lake appears to be a bit underwhelming, it should be better than Skylake or at worst on par. The real game changers are in mobile where the increased efficiency will surely be welcome. With Cannon Lake set to use the same architecture as well, we may have to wait another two years before Intel will release something spectacular again. Perhaps AMD’s Zen will provide Intel an incentive to push their limits again.

its may seems like its just a minor improvement...(just like what everyone have said about it :( )
 

Buaya_Hunter

Banned
Joined
Jun 8, 2001
Messages
27,523
Reaction score
0
Will have issues with W7 or not ah? o_o

Forsee that it will have the same usb key and mouse not working during installation issue as with skylake..... And no new windows 7 drivers for zen

AMD and Intel slowly trying to discontinue support for windows 7.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,380
Reaction score
402
So what happens to the 42% claimed on on some What Crazy Crap Failure Tech website... :s13:
 

riotpatriot

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
376
Reaction score
0
Ahh okay. Going to have to settle for X99 for now (even if Zen turns out better). A bit on the limbo on the software side ._.
 

Buaya_Hunter

Banned
Joined
Jun 8, 2001
Messages
27,523
Reaction score
0
wth like no difference so this also lga 1151?

Only diff I see is use the integrated graphic.

The new one has full hardware support for x265 decoding, which mean the integrated graphic can play 2160p or 4k resolution video by itself without the help of cup or graphic card.
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top