
erm.. look at 3.25% projected.
at 25 years, you put in 60k in premiums, your guaranteed + non-guaranteed + investment is only 58k
Most insurance plans don't give you more than 3.25% actual returns.
Welcome to reality
Eh, that's not how to read it. You're double counting 'cos the Investment returns column is simply the sum of the two columns to the left of it.
The total of guaranteed + non-guaranteed after 25 years is actually only half the premiums paid, although this excludes the yearly coupon (total of $36,000) & the interest on that if you leave it with AIA.
At year 10, if the person surrender this plan, will he gain guaranteed $7210 or loss guarantees $8240?
guranteed $2,100 plus $1,500 x 10 = $17,100?
shouldn't we do a summation from yr 1 to yr 10 on the 'guaranteed' column? Then add the sum with the 1500x9 coupon? (Coupon start on yr 2)
If the guaranteed for yr 10 is only 2100, it doesnt make any sense to me, because the person is losing more money the longer he held on?
simi summation?
u mean add up the guranteed figures from yr 1 to yr 10?
i tot the guranteed figure is only respective to each year?
Initially, I also thought it is respective to each year, but when i crunch the numbers, the loss is getting bigger and bigger as the policy years increase.
At yr 10, if i add up thw guaranteed from yr 1 to yr 10, the person would have gained 7210, and if the guaranteed figure is only respective to each yr, the person would have loss 8420. And the loss is getting bigger and bigger until maturity where the person would lose 22 000 at yr 25.

Initially, I also thought it is respective to each year, but when i crunch the numbers, the loss is getting bigger and bigger as the policy years increase.
At yr 10, if i add up thw guaranteed from yr 1 to yr 10, the person would have gained 7210, and if the guaranteed figure is only respective to each yr, the person would have loss 8420. And the loss is getting bigger and bigger until maturity where the person would lose 22 000 at yr 25.
If you activate the cashback, it will reduce into your guaranteed sum I believe
If you choose the cashback option, your guaranteed amount is paid back to you in the form of the cashback over the years instead of the lump sum.
Whichever the case is, at the end of the maturity, even taking into account that the performance of the insurer is good, the actual return is not high.
If you activate the cashback, it will reduce into your guaranteed sum I believe
Definitely...So it is a poor product to get...
the benefit illustration for the aia plan it already assumes you take the cash back. That's why the guaranteed amount is ridiculously low.
the benefit illustration for the aia plan it already assumes you take the cash back. That's why the guaranteed amount is ridiculously low.
In my opinion it makes no sense to get such a plan. At least i cant see any compelling reason right now except that it forces one to save and have the option of withdrawing for emergency......
The drawback is quite huge though since the guaranteed amount is way lesser than the premium so i would not say it is a good trade at all.