Is there anything wrong with this plan?

akwl88

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
1
very useless plan

ts kenna chop carrot liao

better cut loss ba
 

anfielder

Master Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
2
erm.. look at 3.25% projected.

at 25 years, you put in 60k in premiums, your guaranteed + non-guaranteed + investment is only 58k :s22:

Most insurance plans don't give you more than 3.25% actual returns.
Welcome to reality

Eh, that's not how to read it. You're double counting 'cos the Investment returns column is simply the sum of the two columns to the left of it.

The total of guaranteed + non-guaranteed after 25 years is actually only half the premiums paid, although this excludes the yearly coupon (total of $36,000) & the interest on that if you leave it with AIA.
 

dolph001

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
505
Reaction score
5
Eh, that's not how to read it. You're double counting 'cos the Investment returns column is simply the sum of the two columns to the left of it.

The total of guaranteed + non-guaranteed after 25 years is actually only half the premiums paid, although this excludes the yearly coupon (total of $36,000) & the interest on that if you leave it with AIA.

oh I just realised.
Thanks for pointing out
 

diediex

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
799
Reaction score
215


Found this AIA smart rewards saver plan online. Can anyone enlighten how to read this surrender table? Ie. How much can the person get back if he surrender at the end of Yr 2, 10 and 25? Guaranteed and non-guaranteed.

Note: Guaranteed coupon of 1500 is paid every yr from end of yr 2 onward

At year 10, if the person surrender this plan, will he gain guaranteed $7210 or loss guarantees $8240?
 

diediex

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
799
Reaction score
215
guranteed $2,100 plus $1,500 x 10 = $17,100?

shouldn't we do a summation from yr 1 to yr 10 on the 'guaranteed' column? Then add the sum with the 1500x9 coupon? (Coupon start on yr 2)

If the guaranteed for yr 10 is only 2100, it doesnt make any sense to me, because the person is losing more money the longer he held on?
 

akwl88

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
1
shouldn't we do a summation from yr 1 to yr 10 on the 'guaranteed' column? Then add the sum with the 1500x9 coupon? (Coupon start on yr 2)

If the guaranteed for yr 10 is only 2100, it doesnt make any sense to me, because the person is losing more money the longer he held on?

simi summation?

u mean add up the guranteed figures from yr 1 to yr 10?

i tot the guranteed figure is only respective to each year?
 

diediex

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
799
Reaction score
215
simi summation?

u mean add up the guranteed figures from yr 1 to yr 10?

i tot the guranteed figure is only respective to each year?

Initially, I also thought it is respective to each year, but when i crunch the numbers, the loss is getting bigger and bigger as the policy years increase.

At yr 10, if i add up thw guaranteed from yr 1 to yr 10, the person would have gained 7210, and if the guaranteed figure is only respective to each yr, the person would have loss 8420. And the loss is getting bigger and bigger until maturity where the person would lose 22 000 at yr 25.
 

akwl88

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
1
Initially, I also thought it is respective to each year, but when i crunch the numbers, the loss is getting bigger and bigger as the policy years increase.

At yr 10, if i add up thw guaranteed from yr 1 to yr 10, the person would have gained 7210, and if the guaranteed figure is only respective to each yr, the person would have loss 8420. And the loss is getting bigger and bigger until maturity where the person would lose 22 000 at yr 25.

ask ts to clarify ba

if ts ownself dont know, his agent chop his carrot shiok shiok :s13:
 

dendii

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
628
Reaction score
0
Maybe let me provide more clarity later.

But in general, for cashback policies, returns are usually not good.

I have yet to see any that is good from across insurers.
 

dendii

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
628
Reaction score
0
Basically, if you opt for the cashback option, you will receive a guaranteed $1,500 from end of year 2 onwards.

In total, you are guaranteed to take back $36,000, and a certain non-guaranteed amount.

So assuming start of year 2, there is nothing if you surrender. End of year 2 then you will get $1,500.

Year 10 you will get $1500 x the amount of years, + whatever is the non guaranteed then. Same goes for year 25.

All in all, returns for such plans is very low.

There is no such plan that guarantees 4.75% compounding. The agent has absolutely no idea what he/she is talking about.
 
Last edited:

Jevonology

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
It is not accurate to see the projected 3.25 and 4.75. It varies from different company and you can check the past yield for each and every company on their website to determine their stability.

As for endowment that provides cash back options will always have lower returns than those that do not provide. You have to choose between flexibility and returns.
 

anfielder

Master Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
2
Initially, I also thought it is respective to each year, but when i crunch the numbers, the loss is getting bigger and bigger as the policy years increase.

At yr 10, if i add up thw guaranteed from yr 1 to yr 10, the person would have gained 7210, and if the guaranteed figure is only respective to each yr, the person would have loss 8420. And the loss is getting bigger and bigger until maturity where the person would lose 22 000 at yr 25.

There's no way you will gain just from the guaranteed figure. You should not do summation. But you can add the $1500 per year coupon to your calculations.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
376,276
Reaction score
122,415
If you activate the cashback, it will reduce into your guaranteed sum I believe
 

dendii

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
628
Reaction score
0
If you choose the cashback option, your guaranteed amount is paid back to you in the form of the cashback over the years instead of the lump sum.

Whichever the case is, at the end of the maturity, even taking into account that the performance of the insurer is good, the actual return is not high.

If you activate the cashback, it will reduce into your guaranteed sum I believe
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
376,276
Reaction score
122,415
If you choose the cashback option, your guaranteed amount is paid back to you in the form of the cashback over the years instead of the lump sum.

Whichever the case is, at the end of the maturity, even taking into account that the performance of the insurer is good, the actual return is not high.

Definitely...So it is a poor product to get...
 

anfielder

Master Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
2
If you activate the cashback, it will reduce into your guaranteed sum I believe

the benefit illustration for the aia plan it already assumes you take the cash back. That's why the guaranteed amount is ridiculously low.
 

dendii

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
628
Reaction score
0
In my opinion it makes no sense to get such a plan. At least i cant see any compelling reason right now except that it forces one to save and have the option of withdrawing for emergency......

The drawback is quite huge though since the guaranteed amount is way lesser than the premium so i would not say it is a good trade at all.

Definitely...So it is a poor product to get...
 

dendii

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
628
Reaction score
0
The guaranteed amount is still going to be low even if you dont take the cashback.

Same applies for all plans of such nature.

the benefit illustration for the aia plan it already assumes you take the cash back. That's why the guaranteed amount is ridiculously low.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
376,276
Reaction score
122,415
the benefit illustration for the aia plan it already assumes you take the cash back. That's why the guaranteed amount is ridiculously low.

You referring to post #35 ? Same as Pru's benefit illustration.

They will show 2 separate ones, 1 is cashback all withdrawn, 1 is cashback all accumulated...

In my opinion it makes no sense to get such a plan. At least i cant see any compelling reason right now except that it forces one to save and have the option of withdrawing for emergency......

The drawback is quite huge though since the guaranteed amount is way lesser than the premium so i would not say it is a good trade at all.

Yeah
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top