Is WP arrogant?

siloti

Banned
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
17,267
Reaction score
1
National University of Singapore political scientist Bilveer Singh told TODAY he was not surprised with WP’s no show. “(WP chief) Low Thia Kiang already made it clear that his party will stand in these 28 places, he is not going to give up. If he reneges on his principles, he will get discredited. He cannot afford (that)…You can say there is an ‘arrogance of power’ now because now they are the number one opposition party… But on the other hand, there are valid reasons for why they are putting their position forward (in those places), either where they have contested and lost relatively well, or where they are incumbents.”
 

sianbay2000

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Seriously, are we playing RISK? I will be more worried if they accept other parties withdrawn. Then next time, if WP dun return the favour. It will be worse.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
370,294
Reaction score
118,339
arrogant ? no

they just want to develop on their own

simple as that
 

coey

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2001
Messages
6,848
Reaction score
1,166
Hope those multiple cornered fight really eliminate those buay kan parties.
 

Tloslm

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
2,538
if your party is weaker, don't stand in the way of the stronger one.
 

Ryuichi

Master Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
179
"You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life. –" Winston Churchill
 

Tloslm

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
2,538
Hope those multiple cornered fight really eliminate those buay kan parties.

you are right, all the horse-trading of territories only protect the weak parties to carry on playing this election game.

If you are weak, you deserve to be eliminated in the political process.
Horse-trading of territories only protect the weak parties to carry on being weak and indirectly help pap to carry on stay in power in the long run. and stronger party like WP got restricted by this horse-trading nonsense .

Hope you guys understand this
 
Last edited:

lifeisinforashock

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
43,527
Reaction score
5,810
Is singfirst sda nsp and rp also arrogant to demand wp the boss to come for oppo meeting ?
 

CAShop

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,413
Reaction score
0
Hope those multiple cornered fight really eliminate those buay kan parties.

That's the whole point. WP and SDP should ignore all the other kuchin kurup opposition. Just contest wherever they want. It takes maybe 1 - 2 or at worse 3 elections of losing deposit and and U eliminate the opportunist.

The dominant opposition will consolidate power and grow from there. I advocated this last GE, shortsighted frog in well thinks its a tactic to make multi cornered fight for PAP's benefit. Obviously LTK and Sylvia Lim knows this well and have been ignoring the smaller ones since GE2011. They know the opposition has no unity and they know the opposition cannot work together, so they don't bother.

Only delusional Anti-PAP supporters still think the opposition will form a coalition to bring down PAP. Not going to happen. It will only happen when all the useless ones are eliminated and only 2 maybe at most 3 are left. WP will work with the other opposition to form a coalition to bring down PAP. If there remains many smaller opposition and 1 big PAP and WP, they are more likely going to work with PAP than the smaller ones. This is just plain common sense
 

Coolboiii

Master Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
4
you are right, all the horse-trading of territories only protect the weak parties to carry on playing this election game.

If you are weak, you deserve to be eliminated in the political process.
Horse-trading of territories only protect the weak parties to carry on being weak and indirectly help pap to carry on stay in power in the long run. and stronger party like WP got restricted by this horse-trading nonsense .

Hope you guys understand this

It's an election and we are living in a democratic society. Everyone has the right to stand for an election. Be it wp,nsp, pap, rp or what ever. Ultimately, the people has the choice to vote.

So what's the big hoohaa over this?
 

Tloslm

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
2,538
It's an election and we are living in a democratic society. Everyone has the right to stand for an election. Be it wp,nsp, pap, rp or what ever. Ultimately, the people has the choice to vote.

So what's the big hoohaa over this?

there is no hoohaa, just letting people know the negative result of horse-trading territories.
For Opposition to grow stronger, they cannot shy away from 3 corner fight. Only this way the weak ones will be forced to leave politics and the strong ones left will grow even stronger.
 

Tloslm

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
2,538
That's the whole point. WP and SDP should ignore all the other kuchin kurup opposition. Just contest wherever they want. It takes maybe 1 - 2 or at worse 3 elections of losing deposit and and U eliminate the opportunist.

The dominant opposition will consolidate power and grow from there. I advocated this last GE, shortsighted frog in well thinks its a tactic to make multi cornered fight for PAP's benefit. Obviously LTK and Sylvia Lim knows this well and have been ignoring the smaller ones since GE2011. They know the opposition has no unity and they know the opposition cannot work together, so they don't bother.

Only delusional Anti-PAP supporters still think the opposition will form a coalition to bring down PAP. Not going to happen. It will only happen when all the useless ones are eliminated and only 2 maybe at most 3 are left. WP will work with the other opposition to form a coalition to bring down PAP. If there remains many smaller opposition and 1 big PAP and WP, they are more likely going to work with PAP than the smaller ones. This is just plain common sense

i agree . Opposition supporters have to understand this.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
370,294
Reaction score
118,339
That's the whole point. WP and SDP should ignore all the other kuchin kurup opposition. Just contest wherever they want. It takes maybe 1 - 2 or at worse 3 elections of losing deposit and and U eliminate the opportunist.

The dominant opposition will consolidate power and grow from there. I advocated this last GE, shortsighted frog in well thinks its a tactic to make multi cornered fight for PAP's benefit. Obviously LTK and Sylvia Lim knows this well and have been ignoring the smaller ones since GE2011. They know the opposition has no unity and they know the opposition cannot work together, so they don't bother.

Only delusional Anti-PAP supporters still think the opposition will form a coalition to bring down PAP. Not going to happen. It will only happen when all the useless ones are eliminated and only 2 maybe at most 3 are left. WP will work with the other opposition to form a coalition to bring down PAP. If there remains many smaller opposition and 1 big PAP and WP, they are more likely going to work with PAP than the smaller ones. This is just plain common sense

:s12::s12::s12::s12::s12:
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top