Jacky Wu's 综艺玩很大 - Episodes

yylow30

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
69,501
Reaction score
17
The earlier released, the better :D

Cheers for the update! :s12:

anyway i do realised they change thumbnail liao...
initally it was totally blocking the important part...

they totally did the right thing.

:s13:
 

Toonsy92

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
37,933
Reaction score
2,663
All the Youtube comment say this episode very eye nourishing especially got 梁以辰!:s13::s12::s12:
 

yylow30

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
69,501
Reaction score
17
here we go!!



River Kwai, Kanchanaburi, Part 2...

EDIT: just finished watching... you guys will like this episode...
they film this episode dunno change clothes how many times...
:s22::s22:
 
Last edited:

BHills

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
1,021
all the digs about this show not nominated !

Search and find my post in this thread many months ago about how, just like Running Man in S. Korea, this show is heavily rigged by the producer and players.

This show may be fun to watch for some but seriously lacks depth in contents and ideas. Running Man in Korea had very innovative and intriguing plots etc. in its initial years but the increasing rigging of the show made many watchers became bored unknowingly.

In my opinion, it is well justified that this show has not been nominated for the Golden Bell award.
 

hybridz

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Search and find my post in this thread many months ago about how, just like Running Man in S. Korea, this show is heavily rigged by the producer and players.

This show may be fun to watch for some but seriously lacks depth in contents and ideas. Running Man in Korea had very innovative and intriguing plots etc. in its initial years but the increasing rigging of the show made many watchers became bored unknowingly.

In my opinion, it is well justified that this show has not been nominated for the Golden Bell award.

I disagree. Rigged or not, all variety shows are inevitably have some elements of it to garner more interests and entertainment value. As long as its not so obvious that it insults the viewers' intelligence.

玩很大 has been around for 2 years, and I have been following since the beginning. It caught my attention from the start, got bored in the middle, then refreshed with some new ideas in the second year. This most recent episode was actually one of the better episodes I have watched, both in terms of celebrities and game segments. No single show can run so long (2 years!) being innovative all the time. Its what I learnt from the show - being spirited in what you do, just go for it, and never give up. The last part was especially poignant, just catch the last few minutes to hear what Jacky said. It touched my heart.

I believe there is more to the reason on why the show is not nominated, and most likely to do with Jacky. '真善美'. Really? You must be joking!

Regardless of whether the show is nominated or not (although it would be great if it was to give recognition to the hard work put in by so many people!), I will still support this show. It gave me so much laughter in some of my most painful moments. Let's move on.

Open to hearing any other positives that this show has made in your lives!
 

yylow30

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
69,501
Reaction score
17
This show...
My point is...
I've watched, I've laughed, I'm relaxed, I'm entertained, and I like it...
so I support it...

i had unknowingly followed this show since the beginning too, although i had skipped a number of episodes at the front.

The show is rigged, lack of content, lack of innovation, messy, ugly, SO WHAT?!

while there are reasons why this show is not nominated, there are also many reasons why there are so many people who supports it too...

this show is definitely still in the positives. as long as it remains so, as long as i am still liking it, as long as i still find it a good variety show, i will support. after all, it has did a good job entertaining us.
 
Last edited:

mdax23

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2013
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
58
Nominated or not, ratings is still the more important of the 2.

U can pleased a few judge and get nominated but the show will still be cut if no audience.

Audience = ratings
 

BHills

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
1,021
Many ignorant people have the misconception that awards is about audience viewership.

If it is, then no need judges liao and it would be named as "Most Popular award" instead of what "Golden Horse", "Gold Bell" or what have you and then just have audience cast their votes or through viewership......Most popular Actor, Most popular Actress, Most Popular Newscaster, Most Popular Variety Show, Most Popular Comedy ...... etc. Don't need judges who are either professionals in that area or with 高文化修养 to assess the shows liao.

For e.g. if you ask which of the shows is best, you would get different answers from an uneducated ah Beng and a high professional in show business and educated cultured man. Ah Beng would probably say the show he enjoys the most is the best show while the highly cultured man would look at it from various angles to assess the shows. As far as an Ah Beng is concerned, entertainment as indicated by viewership is the only criteria.

This main difference is "有修养" and "无修养" 的 assessment. Most layman in the street like most of you here simply don't have the necessary professionalism and 文化修养 to judge for those awards and what matters to them is just entertainment because feeling entertained is the most important to them and they don't care about other aspects of what they watch.

The "Best" show or book is not necessarily the best selling simply because the judges are not the uncultured or layman in the street.
 
Last edited:

mdax23

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2013
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
58
In the highly commercialized reality of this world especially the tw media industry, sponsor, tv station care only about rating cos rating = $

Those ppl who try to act like a saint will tell u things like making good tv, socially etiquette programs but unfortunately no viewer = no sponsor = no $ to produce
 

yylow30

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
69,501
Reaction score
17
Many ignorant people have the misconception that awards is about audience viewership.

If it is, then no need judges liao and it would be named as "Most Popular award" instead of what "Golden Horse", "Gold Bell" or what have you and then just have audience cast their votes or through viewership......Most popular Actor, Most popular Actress, Most Popular Newscaster, Most Popular Variety Show, Most Popular Comedy ...... etc. Don't need judges who are either professionals in that area or with 高文化修养 to assess the shows liao.

For e.g. if you ask which of the shows is best, you would get different answers from an uneducated ah Beng and a high professional in show business and educated cultured man. Ah Beng would probably say the show he enjoys the most is the best show while the highly cultured man would look at it from various angles to assess the shows. As far as an Ah Beng is concerned, entertainment as indicated by viewership is the only criteria.

This main difference is "有修养" and "无修养" 的 assessment. Most layman in the street like most of you here simply don't have the necessary professionalism and 文化修养 to judge for those awards and what matters to them is just entertainment because feeling entertained is the most important to them and they don't care about other aspects of what they watch.

The "Best" show or book is not necessarily the best selling simply because the judges are not the uncultured or layman in the street.

the show wasn't done pretty... even as a fan i agree...
if that is the reason why it is not nominated, then well, i got nothing to say... after all, the judges are looking at professionalism... the very precise point you are making here...

but in my opinion, these kind of variety shows are like that. this is what makes them unique, makes them what they are. Can't deny this is not a successful thing you know... if this show is strictly following the book done in a professional way, entertainment value would have dropped way down, then this would not be 综艺玩很大 liao... In fact it is hard to find variety shows that meets both criterias... although both sides do have their preferred audience.

Its either you like it or you hate it. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I'm proud to say i'm the former, then judging from what you said, i can say you are the latter. I don't deny your opinions on the show, but liking a less professionally done show does not make us unprofessional or ignorant, preferring otherwise does not make you professional or cultured enough to judge those awards too.

You would be better off watching talk varieties or competitions like 最强大脑 or The Voice of China...
but those for me, not so much...
 
Last edited:

hybridz

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Many ignorant people have the misconception that awards is about audience viewership.

If it is, then no need judges liao and it would be named as "Most Popular award" instead of what "Golden Horse", "Gold Bell" or what have you and then just have audience cast their votes or through viewership......Most popular Actor, Most popular Actress, Most Popular Newscaster, Most Popular Variety Show, Most Popular Comedy ...... etc. Don't need judges who are either professionals in that area or with 高文化修养 to assess the shows liao.

For e.g. if you ask which of the shows is best, you would get different answers from an uneducated ah Beng and a high professional in show business and educated cultured man. Ah Beng would probably say the show he enjoys the most is the best show while the highly cultured man would look at it from various angles to assess the shows. As far as an Ah Beng is concerned, entertainment as indicated by viewership is the only criteria.

This main difference is "有修养" and "无修养" 的 assessment. Most layman in the street like most of you here simply don't have the necessary professionalism and 文化修养 to judge for those awards and what matters to them is just entertainment because feeling entertained is the most important to them and they don't care about other aspects of what they watch.

The "Best" show or book is not necessarily the best selling simply because the judges are not the uncultured or layman in the street.

Agree to disagree.

I certainly believe there is no checklist to say a show must meet certain criteria in order to win an award, e.g. high ratings, professionalism. Judges are humans too. If they like what they see, then they can give many reasons on why they like them. Same if they don't like what they see. Which is why I thought that the reason why 玩很大 failed to get nominated, let alone win, was because the show lacked 真善美 is lame. Judges are humans and can be biased as well.

I do agree that if a show wins because of high ratings, then it can be a popularity contest. But take a step back, variety show is simply to provide entertainment. If not entertaining, because of high artistic value, what is the point of doing a variety show?

I also don't follow and support the show blindly. There were times when some episodes were poorly done, and a celebrity showing terrible showmanship when losing games. These are rare. At least for me, this show continues to generate more positives than negatives. That's good enough for me, and many other fans here in this forum.
 

yylow30

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
69,501
Reaction score
17


fhfl, uploaded less than a minute!

:s12::s12:

Saitama Prefecture, Japan
 
Last edited:

Toonsy92

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
37,933
Reaction score
2,663


An episode catering for the female fans?:s13::o

Still got quality certified girl guest!:s12:
 

BHills

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
1,021
In life, everything can be judged by more than 1 criteria.

For e.g. Best Student Award in school is judged based on many factors including academic results which most people think is the most important in school.

The Golden Bell is one of those which judge based on many factors. Viewership or popularity is just one of the many factors taken into account.

To say that 综艺玩很大 deserves to be at least nominated or even win the Golden Bell award because it tops the viewership is just like a person saying that this particular student should at least be nominated or even win the "Best Student" award just because he/she has the best academic results in school. :s13::s13::s13::s13:

A knowledgeable person should be able to see that 综艺玩很大 falls short in many areas.
 

Toonsy92

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
37,933
Reaction score
2,663



My parents actually got addicted to this show after my recommendation. :s13::s13:
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top