Justifications

[PaulLevesque]

Hi mods. Why is labelling an entire country as nuisance not considered discrimination/stereotyping?

Also asking for armpit pictures not considered lewd? I've gotten infraction for merely asking for IG leh.

And outright encouraging gambling is not promoting vice?


I want the mod who rejected my reports to come and justify it Thank you

PS : Please allow me time to reply before closing the thread.

 

[ragnarok95]

1) Depending on the context, not ALL pictures showing armpits are lewd.

2) There was no strong evidence that betting/gambling was taking place in that report.

Hence, both reports were rejected.

Thanks

 

[Shutterbox]

1) Depending on the context, not ALL pictures showing armpits are lewd.

2) There was no strong evidence that betting/gambling was taking place in that report.

Hence, both reports were rejected.

Thanks

By your 2nd point reasoning , until and unless a thread as got undesirable postings, the thread should not have been deleted or removed.

But the moderation is not as such.

Every mod will explain his/her way, to his/her level of reasons to moderate.

Its just not consistent

 

[PaulLevesque]

1) Depending on the context, not ALL pictures showing armpits are lewd.

2) There was no strong evidence that betting/gambling was taking place in that report.

Hence, both reports were rejected.

Thanks

1 : How you all define lewd? Meaning next time it's okay to ask for such pictures? I got 3 points for asking for IG, should've asked for armpits instead?

2 : Encouraging gambling is allowed? Telling people use gambling as a mean to get rich is a very irresponsible thing to do. Gambling is definitely not the way to solve financial issues. If that's the case why not bring back the SGpools thread? Everybody can huat together?

3 : What about the one labelling an entire country as nuisance? Anything bad about ****, even when intention and wording is not even proven = straight close thread and infract

But people can label other country as nuisance and nothing happen?

 

[PaulLevesque]

By your 2nd point reasoning , until and unless a thread as got undesirable postings, the thread should not have been deleted or removed.

But the moderation is not as such.

Every mod will explain his/her way, to his/her level of reasons to moderate.

Its just not consistent

Precisely! Shouldn't there be a clear guideline as to what is what and not just based on personal moderation?


There are users who were infracted due to thread spamming and my reports on certain users treating the forum as a blogspot, everyday spam many nonsensical threads was rejected.

I got 6 points for calling out double standard and biasness. I feel this is unfair to me as obviously the mods here are selectively infracting users and i hereby stand by my words. FYI I'm not the only one who believes the moderators here are being biased towards certain users.

 

[hctawsgs]

1 : How you all define lewd? Meaning next time it's okay to ask for such pictures? I got 3 points for asking for IG, should've asked for armpits instead?

2 : Encouraging gambling is allowed? Telling people use gambling as a mean to get rich is a very irresponsible thing to do. Gambling is definitely not the way to solve financial issues. If that's the case why not bring back the SGpools thread? Everybody can huat together?

3 : What about the one labelling an entire country as nuisance? Anything bad about ****, even when intention and wording is not even proven = straight close thread and infract

But people can label other country as nuisance and nothing happen?

Totally agree on pt 3.

 

[ragnarok95]

By your 2nd point reasoning , until and unless a thread as got undesirable postings, the thread should not have been deleted or removed.

But the moderation is not as such.

Every mod will explain his/her way, to his/her level of reasons to moderate.

Its just not consistent

It’s a single report for a single thread reply. It was rejected by 3 mods.

 

[ragnarok95]

Precisely! Shouldn't there be a clear guideline as to what is what and not just based on personal moderation?


There are users who were infracted due to thread spamming and my reports on certain users treating the forum as a blogspot, everyday spam many nonsensical threads was rejected.

I got 6 points for calling out double standard and biasness. I feel this is unfair to me as obviously the mods here are selectively infracting users and i hereby stand by my words. FYI I'm not the only one who believes the moderators here are being biased towards certain users.

For your points, we will look thru again and if it doesn’t fit the infraction, we will remove it. Let me look thru them again. Thanks!