fox1
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2001
- Messages
- 28,008
- Reaction score
- 561
I understand discussions/threads in EDMW generally degenerate to mudslinging and name calling.
I am equally guilty as anyone.
However, to have a mod attack a person based on his position, this is unacceptable.
Would there be anyone who would review Kiwi8's suitability for a moderator role?
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/86374772-post26.html
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/e...claims-made-writer-catherine-lim-4710065.html
Terms of forum use; the very terms he is supposed to be adhering to.
Flaming/Slandering/Personal Attacks
Don't attack others. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack.
Repeated offence by any member will be deemed as an act of purpose violation of our Terms of Use and www.hardwarezone.com® reserves the right to ban offenders from using this forums without prior notice.
Refuse to be responsible and admit his misjudgement.
I am equally guilty as anyone.
However, to have a mod attack a person based on his position, this is unacceptable.
Would there be anyone who would review Kiwi8's suitability for a moderator role?
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/86374772-post26.html
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/e...claims-made-writer-catherine-lim-4710065.html
That Mr Jacky Foo really bhb.![]()
Terms of forum use; the very terms he is supposed to be adhering to.
Flaming/Slandering/Personal Attacks
Don't attack others. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack.
Repeated offence by any member will be deemed as an act of purpose violation of our Terms of Use and www.hardwarezone.com® reserves the right to ban offenders from using this forums without prior notice.
So a mod is allowed to attack a person?
You did not post opinion on his statement, you posted opinion on his person.
![]()
Fine. So in my opinion his statement is a bhb statement. Happy?![]()
Refuse to be responsible and admit his misjudgement.
U can treat my previous post as a clarification. Or a "shift". Or a "flip-flop" for detractors.
I believe I have answered adequately to your queries and your further queries on my statement may not be entertained.
Last edited:
