lifeisinforashock
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 42,594
- Reaction score
- 5,332
Instead of govt workin for pple, now tombalek pple prayin for goodies.
Their work is straight forward.Instead of govt workin for pple, now tombalek pple prayin for goodies.
Wow so called chicken wings Budget?Give cheekon wing den later take back cheekon farm ish call good news?![]()
![]()
Everytime i see you describe their promises as "weasel words"国务资政李显龙说,政府将继续从多方面为人们提供帮助,下个月的财政预算案应该会带来好消息。 https://zb.sg/f3zM
![]()
Analyzing the article, several rhetorical devices and potential biases can be identified.
# Inconsistencies and Contradictions
The article lacks specific details about the government's plans to provide help, creating inconsistency between the promise of assistance and the lack of concrete information.
# Ambiguities and Flaws
The phrase "从多方面为人们提供帮助" (providing help from multiple aspects) is ambiguous, as it doesn't clearly define what aspects or areas the government will focus on ¹.
# Weasel Words and Loaded Language
Using phrases like "应该会带来好消息" (should bring good news) might be seen as weasel words, as they create vague expectations. Loaded language is used when emphasizing the government's efforts to provide help, which may evoke positive emotions.
# Data Discrepancy
There is no data provided to support the effectiveness of the government's plans or the expected positive outcomes.
# Propaganda and Fallacy
The article uses the appeal to emotion fallacy by highlighting the government's efforts to provide help, which may create a positive impression. The bandwagon fallacy is also present, as the article implies that the government's plans are effective because they are promised to bring good news.
# Motherhood Statement
The statement "政府将继续从多方面为人们提供帮助" (the government will continue to provide help from multiple aspects) is a motherhood statement, as it is a vague and feel-good phrase that lacks specific details.
# Roundabout Answer
The article avoids providing direct answers to potential questions about the government's plans, instead focusing on the promise of good news.
# Bias
The article may be seen as biased towards the government, as it presents their efforts in a positive light without providing balanced criticism.
# Hedging Statement
The phrase "应该会带来好消息" (should bring good news) is a hedging statement, as it creates a vague expectation and avoids making specific commitments.
# Dark Psychology Techniques
The article uses the foot-in-the-door technique by presenting the government's efforts as a reasonable and effective solution, making readers more likely to accept their views. The scarcity principle is also used, as the article implies that the government's plans are limited and exclusive, making them more valuable.
Here is the hedging statement from the article:
"下个月的财政预算案应该会带来好消息。"
Translated to English:
"The financial budget next month should bring good news."
This statement is an example of a hedging statement because it:
- Uses the word "应该" (should), which creates a vague expectation
- Avoids making a specific commitment or promise
- Leaves room for interpretation or wiggle room in case the outcome is not as expected.
Later btc become SingTelHope lawless announce 1 bitcoin for every Sinkapore citizen
moi consperm vote him
![]()
Then is obvious vote buying.I would set a target to make it more enticing. Rewards for voters. Overall 65% of vote share each get $300 cash. 70% $500, 80% $700...100% $1200.
Sibei jialat this one. Stepped down already still so visible attend this attend that make so many announcements. Worse than 冤魂不散
![]()